Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by Cool Breeze » Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:40 am

John wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:49 pm
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:39 pm
It's time to come clean, Johnny.
You are driving off a cliff.
I'll see you at 100k, then 500, then a million.

The dinosaur analog economy is being replaced.

To those who can cancel all the noise here, you're welcome.

"I told you so."

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by John » Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:49 pm

Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:39 pm
It's time to come clean, Johnny.
You are driving off a cliff.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by Cool Breeze » Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:39 pm

It's time to come clean, Johnny.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by Guest » Sun Mar 03, 2024 12:43 pm

Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Sep 20, 2023 11:38 am
Guest wrote:
Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:46 am
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:10 am
I am not pro vaccine, since for largely a non disease with effective treatments (HCQ, ivermectin) it was clearly a money grab and definitely has caused harm, but do you really think that people will just start dropping like flies in a year or so? I like predictions but this seems like more of a trial of mRNA therapy with guinea pigs than population control ... for now.
it seems your opinion on this has changed?
I've been consistent. I'm not sure what you are referring to.
Cool Breeze wrote:
Fri May 05, 2023 10:56 am
The data is already incontrovertible, but the degree to which everyone here will even personally know people getting massively ill and/or dying into late 2023 and 2024 will be very obvious.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by Guest » Sat Mar 02, 2024 2:24 am

Cool Breeze wrote:
Tue Mar 30, 2021 10:00 pm
At least you can theoretically suggest that the science makes sense for the mRNA therapy, which it does. That doesn't mean that not robustly testing and watching what it does (as is usual) regarding Adverse Effects is a smart thing to do.
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed May 04, 2022 5:45 pm
How else can people here who largely (not all people) accepted the experimental mRNA therapy and called me crazy (and yet I'm the physician), yet so many have been damaged by it, and it has not stopped the spread of infection, nor helped anyone (especially those with natural immunity) but to set up another dystopian authoritarian society in so many ways?
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Sep 20, 2023 11:38 am
Guest wrote:
Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:46 am
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:10 am
I am not pro vaccine, since for largely a non disease with effective treatments (HCQ, ivermectin) it was clearly a money grab and definitely has caused harm, but do you really think that people will just start dropping like flies in a year or so? I like predictions but this seems like more of a trial of mRNA therapy with guinea pigs than population control ... for now.
it seems your opinion on this has changed?
I've been consistent. I'm not sure what you are referring to.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by John » Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:07 pm

You said that Russia would not invade Ukraine, even after the invasion had begun.
Butler says that Hunter's laptop was fake Russian disinformation.
So you and Butler are very similar in that you both make up "facts."

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by Cool Breeze » Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:53 pm

FullMoon wrote:
Fri Mar 01, 2024 12:24 am
Cool Breeze wrote:
Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:55 pm
FullMoon wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2024 9:25 pm


Not informative, and par for the course.
I've been too accurate on too many things to explain them all over again here.
You've been accurate on things here because you explained them clearly. Like the Covid debacle. But other things you just spout out some grand conclusion without a whit of explanation and then suggest everyone drop everything and go research what you're saying. Which isn't going to happen. Just refrain from doing what Bob does, which is criticizing 'everyone' on this site because they're ____ insert reason.
I'm not anything like that person, which is just insane that anyone here would even draw any similarity. That guy is wrong about basically everything - at best he's somewhat in the ballpark of 3% of what he writes or thinks.

I can explain it all. I catch flak for things that I've explained in great detail, and predicted to a T - such as the inflation not being transitory and exactly where we were headed. And I got more hate. When that happened, it wasn't very much worth it to stick it out as the judgment was so far off, I found few were even level headed like you are, so hey, let them be.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by FullMoon » Fri Mar 01, 2024 12:24 am

Cool Breeze wrote:
Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:55 pm
FullMoon wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2024 9:25 pm
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:39 pm


No, the most important thing is what you are witnessing right as we speak. You're being left behind.
Not informative, and par for the course.
I've been too accurate on too many things to explain them all over again here.
You've been accurate on things here because you explained them clearly. Like the Covid debacle. But other things you just spout out some grand conclusion without a whit of explanation and then suggest everyone drop everything and go research what you're saying. Which isn't going to happen. Just refrain from doing what Bob does, which is criticizing 'everyone' on this site because they're ____ insert reason.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by Cool Breeze » Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:55 pm

FullMoon wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2024 9:25 pm
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:39 pm
FullMoon wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:46 pm

He's quoted in John's book in the war section. And he did have some good contributions. But name calling and petty squabbles made him get mad at 'everyone' here and leave. Kinda like you. You've had good contributions. And bad.
No, the most important thing is what you are witnessing right as we speak. You're being left behind.
Not informative, and par for the course.
I've been too accurate on too many things to explain them all over again here.

Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

by FullMoon » Wed Feb 28, 2024 9:25 pm

Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:39 pm
FullMoon wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:46 pm
Cool Breeze wrote:
Wed Feb 07, 2024 12:04 am


Burner was a visionary.
He's quoted in John's book in the war section. And he did have some good contributions. But name calling and petty squabbles made him get mad at 'everyone' here and leave. Kinda like you. You've had good contributions. And bad.
No, the most important thing is what you are witnessing right as we speak. You're being left behind.
Not informative, and par for the course.

Top