Dakardii's topic

[DaKardii]

Once again you fall back on anti semitism. You are the one that keeps mentioning The Protocols, not others. You make other women look bad.

I "fell back on anti-semitism" because that's EXACTLY why Burner Prime called me a woman. In his world, if you don't believe the Jews are out to destroy the world, you don't deserve to be called a man. And you seem to agree with him.

Let me tell you something. Your ilk are a minority in America and they always will be. In the best of times you'll be a nuisance, and in the worst of times you'll be a national security threat. And during wartime, you'll always root for the enemy because in your world an enemy of the "Zionist Occupied Government" is a friend of yours. You've done it before and you'll do it again when we fight the CCP, even though you often claim to be opposed to Communism. Some of you will even try to serve as collaborators, aka traitors.

Bottom line is, when shit hits the fan, you'd better be on your best behavior. If you try anything stupid, you can share one giant cell with both your own ilk AND the leftist groups who also wish to Balkanize our country. My country will remain in one piece, so help me God.

[Cool Breeze]

I find that people who deny clear evidence to be part of the propaganda effort, unfortunately. At best, they are idealists who don't want to believe that certain objective and verifiable things are going on (regardless of the reason).

It is provable, clear and demonstrable on every turn that certain minorities have institutional control magnitudes beyond what is normal, or in relation to their constitution in the society. Why blame others for pointing this out? Especially when most of these institutions are corrupted to a sickening degree.

[DaKardii]

I find that people who deny clear evidence to be part of the propaganda effort, unfortunately. At best, they are idealists who don't want to believe that certain objective and verifiable things are going on (regardless of the reason).

It is provable, clear and demonstrable on every turn that certain minorities have institutional control magnitudes beyond what is normal, or in relation to their constitution in the society. Why blame others for pointing this out? Especially when most of these institutions are corrupted to a sickening degree.

Evidence of what? Institutional bias or an international conspiracy?

If you're talking about institutional bias, then the constitution of the institution is not enough evidence to conclude that bias exists. What also must be taken into account is how pluralistic the society is. Pluralism and institutional bias are inversely proportional to each other. The less pluralistic the society, the more likely it is that institutional bias does indeed exist.

But if you're talking about an international conspiracy where most if not all Jews are secretly working to take over the world and destroy everything that's non-Jewish, then no. Just no.

[Cool Breeze]

Actually, there is an existential threat coming out of the Middle East. It's called the petrodollar agreement. That goes, and our economy instantly collapses like a house of cards.

False. Just like your BTC fear porn. I'm not against precious metals and have some, but you can't eat them or do anything with them, and if the situation is dire, they are pretty much just as useless as anything else that you claim will be "gone". And silver at that point is even more practical than gold on many levels. The issue is that metals won't increase in value very much, although they will increase, but relative to BTC they'll be orphans - and there are many reasons why.

Conspiracy theorists talking about the Petrodollar system have been deluding people for years. Martin Armstrong discusses the silly topic in many places, but here is a morsel for your edification:

I have explained that there is no PETRODOLLAR. This is completely bogus. I really do not understand how they can keep saying this factually incorrect information to get people to hand them their life-savings. The oil and gas drilling sector make up between 4.6% and 6.5% of the global economy. That is it. How can you call this a “PETRODOLLAR” by any rational means?

As usual, fear porn reigns and I have to set people straight. The issue is never that any of you are totally wrong, it's that you talk out of your ass and without reason, exaggerate, etc which is what emotional people do (also scared people, or hucksters) ... no wonder Burner calls you names like "woman."

[Cool Breeze]

Again, that's not my position. Read what I have said and accurately characterize, or draw the right conclusions. That's what I do and what right minded thinkers should do.

[DaKardii]

Again, that's not my position. Read what I have said and accurately characterize, or draw the right conclusions. That's what I do and what right minded thinkers should do.

Which one is not your position? Or is neither guess correct?

[Cool Breeze]

The conversations are hard to follow because I think the responses and jumping from thread to thread.

[John]

** 20-Jan-2021 World View: Jumping posts

> The conversations are hard to follow because I think the responses
> and jumping from thread to thread.

Sorry. I moved the wrong post, but moved it back again.

Still, it would be very helpful if you didn't call someone a woman
just because he disagrees with you. If you didn't do things like
that, then I would have to move posts.

[DaKardii]

** 20-Jan-2021 World View: Jumping posts

> The conversations are hard to follow because I think the responses
> and jumping from thread to thread.

Sorry. I moved the wrong post, but moved it back again.

Still, it would be very helpful if you didn't call someone a woman
just because he disagrees with you. If you didn't do things like
that, then I would have to move posts.

The post you moved is still here.

[Cool Breeze]

I said Burner did, which was true.

BTW John, I think it is important for others to see that Kardii's petrodollar nonsense is rebutted, and well, by others whom I have referenced.