Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

[Cool Breeze]

Burner, one more question, since they are calling me names on another thread now. Do you think that the Higgies and Johns of the world are truly clueless about what people or groups have major control in the world? Or do they just like ad hominem when they decide they don't like you?

To be fair, the Higster has been more open minded, but doesn't agree. His mind was opened by my arguments on the BTC level, so he does have some hope.

[FullMoon]

You both are arrogant but smart. Young and unattached. Liable to be susceptible to extreme ideas. Get a wife, kids and perspective. Ain't gonna find a good wife, you gotta make do

[Clarkmod]

I agree with you.

Why do you think some of the heavy hitters on this site don't understand this, though?

Let's talk about the Federal Reserve first. Tying this back to the previous post, I was talking to a woman who worked for the Wisconsin Pension Board or whatever it is called. This was around 2004 and I told her that the Federal Reserve should be abolished. She dropped me like a hot potato immediately after I said that. I can only guess that in her mind I was some right wing conspiracy nut who temporarily escaped from my bunker in Northern Idaho and was advocating the overthrow of the Federal government. I think the problem was and still is to a slightly lesser extent that the Federal Reserve is something that most people only vaguely understand, much less connect to anything meaningful beyond the fact that they print our currency and control the supply of money and short term interest rates. A few years ago, I linked to a survey given to members of the Triple Nine Society, which is a high IQ group that goes way beyond Mensa, only admitting people with IQs that occur at a frequency of 1 in 1000 or less. In the post, I pointed out that while Democrats consider themselves the more intelligent of the 2 parties, Triple Nine Society members lean Libertarian by a huge margin in many areas except in how they view the Federal Reserve. The point being that Triple Nine Society members are not fooled by anything except what the Federal Reserve is and what it should be doing, in my opinion, and if even those people can be fooled and I am right in what I am saying, not much can be done.

I was surprised to find a link with extensive data which supports this view.

It's from an organization called the Triple Nine Society, which only admits people with IQs proven to be above the 99.9th percentile, and they did an extensive survey of political views among members. It turned out that their members support neither a Democrat nor Republican agenda, but rather lean strongly Libertarian toward very limited government. For example, 94% are in favor of gun ownership at the same time 60% are in favor of minimal restrictions on prostitution.

http://milesresearch.com/tns/summary.htm

So while it may be true that The 97th Percentile tends to support socialism and consider themselves qualified to tell the rest of society what is good for them, those rare individuals with IQs more than one standard deviation above The 97th Percentile do not support those views.

It should be noted, though, that about 150,000 adults in the US would be qualified to join this organization, but it only has about 350 members, so there could be some bias in the results due to the type of person among the high IQ population who would tend to join such an organization.

The majority of survey participants support the status quo for the Federal Reserve, but the survey was done in the early 2000s (October 2000) before the Fed went off the rails or, alternatively, didn't have an extensive history of having gone off the rails. Greenspan was a bit off the rails at the time.

Intelligence has never been the issue, wisdom has been. Also, understanding who runs things, and it isn't the "hyperintelligent". These rarely matter, though they might matter on an individual basis over time (Newton, Tesla, etc). Notice they rarely make that much of a difference in their lifetimes, though. Who makes the difference and the decisions? The Anglo-Zionist banksters, of which the Fed is part. Yet so many on this forum can't even speak honestly about the in your face zionists that are in every meaningful institution in America. I get called names for pointing this obvious thing out. What's more, it's now being openly admitted by most due to the whole celebrity thing exposing it, regardless of what you think of him.

This also happens in generational crises, yet John has not mentioned the group almost always involved in them. He lacks a spiritual understanding of the world is the reason why.

[Clarkmod]

Intelligence has never been the issue, wisdom has been.

This industrial civilization goes to great lengths to assess and identify individuals who have intelligence according to the criteria that generally lead to career success and put those people in positions of decision-making (within limits of intelligence), but has no processes in place to assess and identify individuals who have wisdom or to place them in any position of decision-making. Also, in our everyday conversations both public and private, there are constant references to those who are “smart” but somewhere between zero and a very small number of references to people who are “wise”. Therefore, it’s not possible to point to a group of wise people who have been identified by some tried and true process and know what that group thinks about the Federal Reserve, or anything else. The problem if the wise were to somehow get control of decision making at this time is that the position industrial civilization currently finds itself in is not a good one for the wise to grapple with. People with wisdom are good at keeping a civilization on the correct path but not so good at knowing what to do with it once it has deviated from that path for a long time. An example of that might be the question of whether the world should have gone down the path of R&D and manufacturing of synthetic chemicals. The wise probably would have determined not go down that path, but in this industrial civilization they weren’t in any position of authority to determine whether that was going to be done; the intelligent (at the approximate level of the 97th Percentile, but not the highest level) were. Now that we have gone down that path, the wise probably can’t help us. Similarly, now that the Federal Reserve boondoggle has been going on for a long time, assuming abolishing the Fed is a wise choice, the wise can’t help much with that either. However, there are “primitive” civilizations that do have processes to assess and identify individuals who have wisdom and put them into positions of responsibility and authority. Those are the villages and their elders. If the large and highly centralized governments in this industrial civilization were to collapse, followed by important decision-making being made at the town level, I believe there would be improvement in the quality of decisions being made. Probably not uniformly, but at a minimum in isolated pockets, and those pockets of good decision-making will be the areas that will prosper and become models for other places to follow as they try to regain their footing.

Having said that, intelligence clearly is an issue. It's pretty clear to me that intelligence correlates with wisdom, probably not strongly or linearly (r = perhaps 0.4 or 0.5 on average). It correlates with individual success and societal success using a wide range of definitions as to what success means. Having The 97th Percentile make decisions rather than the 99.7th percentile is a huge problem. Somehow boosting the level of The 97th Percentile (in other words, those who are the decision-makers) to the current level of the 99.7th percentile would result in huge positive benefits.

Good post. I think you are right, but you still resist dealing with the real problem - groups are running things. And they are elite groups, and types of ethnic groups, or combinations thereof. They also are in league with dark spiritual forces. Ultimately, the real issue (even if you don't want to talk about that) is that there can't be a utopia here on earth, and we can have some decent runs for a while, but the mass man ends up being a pawn to the larger, abusive structure and tricksters who have used the alchemy of banking and the printing press to bait and switch them. Now they want them to vanish entirely from the earth. Interesting times we are in, indeed.

[Clarkmod]

Likewise, encouraging the diversity of subgroups in the US would be a good thing. It would increase resilience. It would provide test cases for what works and what doesn't. I recently read about some African Americans from Atlanta who decided to buy some land and form their own community which, I'm assuming, would exclude whites. This is not racism; it is what diversity is. Diversity is not cramming a bunch of different people into one space. It is a group of people making a determination of what would be in their best interests and exercising the freedom to do that. It may be a good idea or a bad idea. If it's a bad idea, it will fail or be less successful than some other idea. It may fail due to bad governance. I say let the market prove it out and for The 97th Percentile to stop telling people what's good or bad. The technology exists to do this and it should be encouraged. Of course, that would also include diverse groups that don't pertain to race.

These are good ideas and also why they won't happen, because certain groups I've talked about run the show and they are all about maintaining their group but sabotaging others for survival. You know who I'm talking about too, in fact they state this wherever they go after they get kicked out of yet another nation.

They foment division with reasons why certain groups don't do as well as others - all made up. Of course europeans are going to do better (materially) than other groups, we already know this from history. People have to be ok with the reality of the world, of which this is one.

[Clarkmod]

Likewise, encouraging the diversity of subgroups in the US would be a good thing. It would increase resilience. It would provide test cases for what works and what doesn't. I recently read about some African Americans from Atlanta who decided to buy some land and form their own community which, I'm assuming, would exclude whites. This is not racism; it is what diversity is. Diversity is not cramming a bunch of different people into one space. It is a group of people making a determination of what would be in their best interests and exercising the freedom to do that. It may be a good idea or a bad idea. If it's a bad idea, it will fail or be less successful than some other idea. It may fail due to bad governance. I say let the market prove it out and for The 97th Percentile to stop telling people what's good or bad. The technology exists to do this and it should be encouraged. Of course, that would also include diverse groups that don't pertain to race.

These are good ideas and also why they won't happen, because certain groups I've talked about run the show and they are all about maintaining their group but sabotaging others for survival. You know who I'm talking about too, in fact they state this wherever they go after they get kicked out of yet another nation.

They foment division with reasons why certain groups don't do as well as others - all made up. Of course europeans are going to do better (materially) than other groups, we already know this from history. People have to be ok with the reality of the world, of which this is one.

The Christian Identity talking points that you keep promoting have been around for a long time and have failed to gain traction in the marketplace of ideas. There was free reign on the Internet for a long time but even that didn't help much. That is probably because people judge these to be failed ideas, not that they have been brainwashed by some group, as Christian Identity philosophy claims. Even so, sites that were banished by the free marketplace of ideas to the far corners of the Internet are still around so far as I know. At this late date, I think the only relevance of the Christian Identity movement or maybe more properly its remnants is going to be in whatever disorganized havoc they can create in taking down infrastructure, as the FBI recently sort of implied. I think any potential well organized and successful anti-government insurrection is likely to come from someplace else. Maybe ex-police or ex-military, I don't know.

[Clarkmod]

These are good ideas and also why they won't happen, because certain groups I've talked about run the show and they are all about maintaining their group but sabotaging others for survival. You know who I'm talking about too, in fact they state this wherever they go after they get kicked out of yet another nation.

They foment division with reasons why certain groups don't do as well as others - all made up. Of course europeans are going to do better (materially) than other groups, we already know this from history. People have to be ok with the reality of the world, of which this is one.

The Christian Identity talking points that you keep promoting have been around for a long time and have failed to gain traction in the marketplace of ideas. There was free reign on the Internet for a long time but even that didn't help much. That is probably because people judge these to be failed ideas, not that they have been brainwashed by some group, as Christian Identity philosophy claims. Even so, sites that were banished by the free marketplace of ideas to the far corners of the Internet are still around so far as I know. At this late date, I think the only relevance of the Christian Identity movement or maybe more properly its remnants is going to be in whatever disorganized havoc they can create in taking down infrastructure, as the FBI recently sort of implied. I think any potential well organized and successful anti-government insurrection is likely to come from someplace else. Maybe ex-police or ex-military, I don't know.

Haha, the "free marketplace of ideas". That's funny. It's not "Christian Identity" to know how the world works, but of course it does help to be a Christian, since it is the Truth. In no way do I believe that there is, or should be, a "christian" anti-gov insurrection, by the way.

Look up all the institutions and who leads them, then come back with a straight face and sound mind and tell me anything I'm getting at is wrong. I'll let history speak for itself. No one just woke up and didn't like other people. It is, and always was, for a reason. The reasons are clear.

[Clarkmod]

The Christian Identity talking points that you keep promoting have been around for a long time and have failed to gain traction in the marketplace of ideas. There was free reign on the Internet for a long time but even that didn't help much. That is probably because people judge these to be failed ideas, not that they have been brainwashed by some group, as Christian Identity philosophy claims. Even so, sites that were banished by the free marketplace of ideas to the far corners of the Internet are still around so far as I know. At this late date, I think the only relevance of the Christian Identity movement or maybe more properly its remnants is going to be in whatever disorganized havoc they can create in taking down infrastructure, as the FBI recently sort of implied. I think any potential well organized and successful anti-government insurrection is likely to come from someplace else. Maybe ex-police or ex-military, I don't know.

Haha, the "free marketplace of ideas". That's funny. It's not "Christian Identity" to know how the world works, but of course it does help to be a Christian, since it is the Truth. In no way do I believe that there is, or should be, a "christian" anti-gov insurrection, by the way.

Look up all the institutions and who leads them, then come back with a straight face and sound mind and tell me anything I'm getting at is wrong. I'll let history speak for itself. No one just woke up and didn't like other people. It is, and always was, for a reason. The reasons are clear.

We're running a test of the free marketplace of ideas right here, as has been the case in other threads. Once you pop up with your Christian Identity verbiage, you don't see anybody asking you to tell them more and the thread gets vacated with the exception of a guest here and there, which you say you detest guest without handles. That will happen in this thread too - just watch the free marketplace of ideas operate and give you the feedback.

Um, I think this happened in your own thread where all your Christian Identity stuff was moved to. Though I see Burner posted something in there today - first post in months.

[Clarkmod]

Tuesday December 13th, 2022.

I don't know if you caught this, higgy, but when cool. said" look up all the institutions and who leads them ," he's referring to Jews. Cool is a fanatic Orthodox Christian and a fanatic anti-semite.
He's also a fanatic Russian troll.

[Clarkmod]

Tuesday December 13th, 2022.

I don't know if you caught this, higgy, but when cool. said" look up all the institutions and who leads them ," he's referring to Jews. Cool is a fanatic Orthodox Christian and a fanatic anti-semite.
He's also a fanatic Russian troll.

Basically, the Christian Identity talking points I'm referring to that Cool Breeze uses repeatedly are as follows:

1. The US government and US institutions have been taken over by Jews - hence, his frequent references to ZOG - the "Zionist Occupational Government".
2. Through this occupation by the Jews, the Jews are responsible for and have deliberately flooded the White ancestral homelands with inferior peoples for nefarious reasons.
3. Jewish controlled mass media and entertainment are brainwashing white people.

There is much more to it but those are the basic elements of Christian Identity and the same elements Cool Breeze hammers on over and over.