Re: Cool Breeze's Topic
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 10:24 am
It dipped to 26.5 about 7 hours ago.
Generational theory, international history and current events
http://www.gdxforum.com/forum/
That's not 26. Prove that you bought 26.5, windbag.
You might *think* Armstrong is wrong about a lot of things, but you and him agree on one point.
He says,thomasglee wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 9:23 pmYou might *think* Armstrong is wrong about a lot of things, but you and him agree on one point.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/worl ... cy-crisis/
The problem with this, though technically accurate, is that the point is based on the fact that the business cycle isn't as extreme if you have a solid asset that is the backer of the monetary system. So Martin is right but he is a bit deceptive here.As I have said, cryptocurrencies are an asset – not money. They are by no means a safe harbor against “fiat currency” and will NEVER be a store of value because NOTHING ever is. Gold rises and falls. Even during the 19th century, there was inflation and deflation. Guess what? When you are on a gold standard, the value of gold rises and falls just as the dollar does right now.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/worl ... ive-wwiii/If we were to get into a direct war with Russia or China, they will attack those three key sectors — power, communication, and water. How are cryptocurrencies going to survive such an event?
Call me old fashion, old-school, or just old. But the most PRACTICAL thing you can do is have pre-1965 silver coins that the average person can recognize and see the date knowing that it is valuable. We have all seen those videos where a person is offered a silver bar or a chocolate bar, and they take the chocolate. DO NOT judge everyone by yourself. Just because you understand something does not mean everyone does.
Cryptocurrencies are TRADING VEHICLES but not a long-term asset class. Our computer called the top in the cryptos, and it has been the ONLY unbiased forecaster out there. This is why so many major institutions and central banks look at our system — it has NO conflict of interest and NO HUMAN EMOTIONS (like Spock of Star Trek). Someone neck-deep in crypto will never see a decline because they are influenced by their own position.
But wait, you call MA a nut case as well as anyone who listens to ANYTHING he says....Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 1:17 pmMartin Armstrong nails it again! He called the top in crypto, the only person in the world to call it.
Yes, sir, someone neck-deep in crypto (i.e. Cool Breeze) will never see the decline because they are influenced by their own position. This is just a fact.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/worl ... ive-wwiii/If we were to get into a direct war with Russia or China, they will attack those three key sectors — power, communication, and water. How are cryptocurrencies going to survive such an event?
Call me old fashion, old-school, or just old. But the most PRACTICAL thing you can do is have pre-1965 silver coins that the average person can recognize and see the date knowing that it is valuable. We have all seen those videos where a person is offered a silver bar or a chocolate bar, and they take the chocolate. DO NOT judge everyone by yourself. Just because you understand something does not mean everyone does.
Cryptocurrencies are TRADING VEHICLES but not a long-term asset class. Our computer called the top in the cryptos, and it has been the ONLY unbiased forecaster out there. This is why so many major institutions and central banks look at our system — it has NO conflict of interest and NO HUMAN EMOTIONS (like Spock of Star Trek). Someone neck-deep in crypto will never see a decline because they are influenced by their own position.
There's too much really serious stuff going on in the world to have to
> "may"? lol, another thing I've been right about