Good strategic awareness! Things are in the late stages and this could be part of the trigger. Or maybe just the cumulative weight of all the stresses.tim wrote: ↑Wed Feb 01, 2023 7:47 amhttps://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... very-area/
I agree with Jeff Nyquist in that if the U.S. starts to understand what the mRNA injections actually are and Americans are able to see the Chinese involvement the Chinese attack will begin.China’s military is engaged in an alarming buildup of forces in “every warfare area,” the chief of Navy intelligence said in recent remarks.
“The military modernization in China in general, not just in the maritime area, is one of the fastest we’ve seen in human history, [and] it goes well beyond what China needs for its defense,” Rear Adm. Michael Studeman told the Intelligence and National Security Alliance, a private group on Jan. 11. “So, what you’ve seen is a buildup in every warfare area.”
JEFF NYQUIST says:
JANUARY 28, 2023 AT 2:02 PM
If you have just poisoned your partner at the dinner table, you watch him very carefully to see if he realizes what you have done and suddenly kills you before he keels over. China is watching us with this same vigilance. If we start to figure things out, they may have no choice but to strike.
Nuclear War
Re: Nuclear War
-
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm
Re: Nuclear War
Fauci et al and corporations teamed up with the Chinese (like the Biden family has done, Feinstein, McConnell, etc) to make the virus and the bioweapon. What on earth are you all talking about? The military even forced the bioweapon jabs on our own military! Nyquist thinks these have anything to do with whether we go to war with China or not? Our institutions/pols are controlled by China, or by those who control China, or all of the above.
This analysis is retard level.
This analysis is retard level.
Re: Nuclear War
So are will we be at war in 2023? I remember the peanut gallery here predicting war by October 2022 at the latest.Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 03, 2023 1:15 pmFauci et al and corporations teamed up with the Chinese (like the Biden family has done, Feinstein, McConnell, etc) to make the virus and the bioweapon. What on earth are you all talking about? The military even forced the bioweapon jabs on our own military! Nyquist thinks these have anything to do with whether we go to war with China or not? Our institutions/pols are controlled by China, or by those who control China, or all of the above.
This analysis is retard level.
Re: Nuclear War
The joint SK, Japan and US first strike plan on NK is scary.
In the first 12 hours the entire NK artillery positions will be pounded with bunker busting missiles over 240km long and 150km wide. This is to prevent any greater damage to Seoul. After that the intensity would shift to carpet bombing any army pockets within 50 km from the DM line. Within 24h around 200.000 SK troops would swap over the DM in to NK.
Within 48h all military bases, radars, launchers and everything else of stationary military assets would be bombed as well.
After 3 days the US and allied forces would land and invasion force North of Pjongyang on the Taerjong River and cut NK in two. This would be a fast tank attack force.
Probably 30000 SK paratroops would land on the NK chinese border and cut off the bridge heads to and from china.
Pjongyang would undergo huge bombardments on any government or regime building.
The NK troops would collapse in 3 days and for every additional day would endure 90% losses for each divisions soldiers engaging the invasion force.
In case of ballistic missile launches from the north, these sites would be met with the all B2 bombers, with the option of a nuclear strike if needed.
After 1 month all important places in NK would or could be occupied by paratroops being airdroped.
China would not be able to amass enough troops and has no invasion logistics ready to cross the Yalu River anywhere. The chinese army needed to counter attack would be stuck in a 200km trafficjam in Dangdong.
In the first 12 hours the entire NK artillery positions will be pounded with bunker busting missiles over 240km long and 150km wide. This is to prevent any greater damage to Seoul. After that the intensity would shift to carpet bombing any army pockets within 50 km from the DM line. Within 24h around 200.000 SK troops would swap over the DM in to NK.
Within 48h all military bases, radars, launchers and everything else of stationary military assets would be bombed as well.
After 3 days the US and allied forces would land and invasion force North of Pjongyang on the Taerjong River and cut NK in two. This would be a fast tank attack force.
Probably 30000 SK paratroops would land on the NK chinese border and cut off the bridge heads to and from china.
Pjongyang would undergo huge bombardments on any government or regime building.
The NK troops would collapse in 3 days and for every additional day would endure 90% losses for each divisions soldiers engaging the invasion force.
In case of ballistic missile launches from the north, these sites would be met with the all B2 bombers, with the option of a nuclear strike if needed.
After 1 month all important places in NK would or could be occupied by paratroops being airdroped.
China would not be able to amass enough troops and has no invasion logistics ready to cross the Yalu River anywhere. The chinese army needed to counter attack would be stuck in a 200km trafficjam in Dangdong.
Re: Nuclear War
![Image](https://media4.giphy.com/media/xT9IgmYU3ZVaCjGafm/giphy.gif)
Problem is that there's not enough bunker busting missiles, or even bombs, in the WORLD to accomplish that first task.
Second problem is that SK doesn't HAVE 30,000 paratroopers. And even IF they had them they would surely not drop them 800 miles behind enemy lines and on the border of a very big and not so friendly nation.
-
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm
Re: Nuclear War
They've been waiting a long time, but that time might come this year. We are already in WW3, just early stages.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:51 amSo are will we be at war in 2023? I remember the peanut gallery here predicting war by October 2022 at the latest.Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 03, 2023 1:15 pmFauci et al and corporations teamed up with the Chinese (like the Biden family has done, Feinstein, McConnell, etc) to make the virus and the bioweapon. What on earth are you all talking about? The military even forced the bioweapon jabs on our own military! Nyquist thinks these have anything to do with whether we go to war with China or not? Our institutions/pols are controlled by China, or by those who control China, or all of the above.
This analysis is retard level.
Re: Nuclear War
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-has- ... 1675779463
China Has More ICBM Launchers Than U.S., American Military Reports
While the U.S. leads in intercontinental missiles and warheads, China’s gains are fueling debate in Congress
The U.S. military has notified Congress that China now has more land-based intercontinental-range missile launchers than the U.S., fueling the debate about how Washington should respond to Beijing’s nuclear buildup.
“The number of land-based fixed and mobile ICBM launchers in China exceeds the number of ICBM launchers in the United States,” the commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, which oversees nuclear forces, wrote the Senate’s and House’s Armed Services Committees on Jan. 26.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Re: Nuclear War
I wonder if the timing of this report is related to the balloon which just flew over our ICBM complexes, both of which have been reported on widely by the MSN. I'm starting to get the feeling of 2020, when a flu-like virus got inflated into a death scare pandemic by the MSN for those with ulterior motives.tim wrote: ↑Wed Feb 08, 2023 7:59 amhttps://www.wsj.com/articles/china-has- ... 1675779463
China Has More ICBM Launchers Than U.S., American Military Reports
While the U.S. leads in intercontinental missiles and warheads, China’s gains are fueling debate in CongressThe U.S. military has notified Congress that China now has more land-based intercontinental-range missile launchers than the U.S., fueling the debate about how Washington should respond to Beijing’s nuclear buildup.
“The number of land-based fixed and mobile ICBM launchers in China exceeds the number of ICBM launchers in the United States,” the commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, which oversees nuclear forces, wrote the Senate’s and House’s Armed Services Committees on Jan. 26.
Re: Nuclear War
Could it begin in South Korea? Then spread to Taiwan?Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed Feb 08, 2023 12:38 amThey've been waiting a long time, but that time might come this year. We are already in WW3, just early stages.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:51 amSo are will we be at war in 2023? I remember the peanut gallery here predicting war by October 2022 at the latest.Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Fri Feb 03, 2023 1:15 pmFauci et al and corporations teamed up with the Chinese (like the Biden family has done, Feinstein, McConnell, etc) to make the virus and the bioweapon. What on earth are you all talking about? The military even forced the bioweapon jabs on our own military! Nyquist thinks these have anything to do with whether we go to war with China or not? Our institutions/pols are controlled by China, or by those who control China, or all of the above.
This analysis is retard level.
Re: Nuclear War
Looks like Korea will be first.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Feb 19, 2023 12:38 pmCould it begin in South Korea? Then spread to Taiwan?Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed Feb 08, 2023 12:38 amThey've been waiting a long time, but that time might come this year. We are already in WW3, just early stages.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 5:51 am
So are will we be at war in 2023? I remember the peanut gallery here predicting war by October 2022 at the latest.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests