Generational Dynamics World View News
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
John, did you notice that "CH86" revealingly mis-quoted your "faster than Jack Robinson" comment as "Jackie Robinson." Since the "Jack Robinson" slang is quite old, probably from 18th Century America (and has nothing to do with the famous baseball player), Mr CH86 reveals himself to be either (a) quite young, or (b) ignorant of American culture and slang and most likely a "furriner." I'd bet Asian or Russian, here to sow discord and doubt in your forum. Another example of Chinese infiltrators who despise your views?
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
** 25-Aug-2019 CH86 and Jack Robinson
was because my mother used to use it. As you say, the phrase dates
back to the 1700s, and possibly the 1600s:
https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/jack-robinson.html
As for CH86, I don't think the Chinese sent him. He was born in 1986,
so he's just a child. He's was in the Fourth Turning forum since the
mid-2000s, but after all these years, still has no grasp at all of
even the simplest concepts in the Fourth Turning book. As far as I
can tell, he had a very bad relationship with father, because he
vitriolically hates Boomers, and interprets everything through the
lens of "how did the evil Boomers cause this." He's a one-issue
fanatic, and he often writes incoherent gibberish.
Here's what he wrote yesterday:
be "Mixed race" is interesting. Since he hates immigrants and others
of "Mixed race," maybe this explains why he hates himself. Also,
maybe it tells us that his parents are of different races, and that's
influenced his fanaticism and insanity.
Actually, I didn't know all that stuff. The reason I used the phraseshoshin wrote: > John, did you notice that "CH86" revealingly mis-quoted your
> "faster than Jack Robinson" comment as "Jackie Robinson." Since
> the "Jack Robinson" slang is quite old, probably from 18th Century
> America (and has nothing to do with the famous baseball player),
> Mr CH86 reveals himself to be either (a) quite young, or (b)
> ignorant of American culture and slang and most likely a
> "furriner." I'd bet Asian or Russian, here to sow discord and
> doubt in your forum. Another example of Chinese infiltrators who
> despise your views?
was because my mother used to use it. As you say, the phrase dates
back to the 1700s, and possibly the 1600s:
https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/jack-robinson.html
As for CH86, I don't think the Chinese sent him. He was born in 1986,
so he's just a child. He's was in the Fourth Turning forum since the
mid-2000s, but after all these years, still has no grasp at all of
even the simplest concepts in the Fourth Turning book. As far as I
can tell, he had a very bad relationship with father, because he
vitriolically hates Boomers, and interprets everything through the
lens of "how did the evil Boomers cause this." He's a one-issue
fanatic, and he often writes incoherent gibberish.
Here's what he wrote yesterday:
This is a good example of his incoherent gibberish, but his claim toCH86 wrote: > I'm actually of Mixed race, but the Clintons and Desire they and
> other Silent/Boomer Gerontocrats personify to turn us all into
> metrosexual Fags IS the crisis. Now they want to Import Hordes of
> Foreigners from the third world in order to replace Actual
> Americans because they know actual Americans do not/no longer
> agree with them, increasingly even the non-white ones. The
> elimination of the Clintons and their Ilk is the necessary
> prerequisite in order get anything done. Only Known Globalist
> constituencies (Liberal aristocrats, Jews, Southern Black Women,
> Fat Girls, Fags and subservient Momma's boys) still believe and
> follow Clintonism and the Clintons.
be "Mixed race" is interesting. Since he hates immigrants and others
of "Mixed race," maybe this explains why he hates himself. Also,
maybe it tells us that his parents are of different races, and that's
influenced his fanaticism and insanity.
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
Most Millennials would like to take a giant wrecking ball to the statue of liberty and UN headquarters and would have a great big grin while doing it. You just choose to surround yourself with the subservient "teacher's pet" millies and SJWs because those are the only ones who could possibly align with you. The "kids" have NEVER been on board with your policies as far back as the Iranian Hostage crisis back in 1979. We hate you neocons and Neolibs and your centrist candidates. Just thinking of all the opportunities missed in the past 39 years if boomers when they saw the blindfolded embassy personnel, and then simply said "we're sorry that our humanitarian pacifism caused other nations to view us as weaklings we're sorry". If boomers simply done that instead of being globalist control freaks obsessed with childish ideals we would have most of our problems. Foreigners are being mass imported who want a free lunch but boomers REFUSE to turn them back because that would be "mean". Boomers give money to criminal foreigners while our veterans starve in the streets. WE NON-GLOBALISTS ARE PUTTING OUR FOOT DOWN, we will NOT be ruled by Losers, Retards, Globalist Jews, Neocons, Fags, Fat Girls and Southern black Aunt Jeminas. The genetically fit Americans of all types, are saying NO to this tyranny of Losers and Human Refuse.
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
Great article from November 2016 about the Current order in the west, its current stability levels and the Possiblity of a Nuclear World War III.
http://thesaker.is/trump-elected-as-pre ... rtunities/
http://thesaker.is/trump-elected-as-pre ... rtunities/
Last edited by CH86 on Sun Aug 25, 2019 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tom Mazanec
- Posts: 4180
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
Gee, CH86, I'm glad to know that Truman could not go into Korea, and Johnson could not go into Vietnam, without Congressional approval. Why if not for that there could be a wall in Washington DC with almost 60,000 names on it!CH86 wrote:No we won't, also congress and senate must approve so even if we do (intervene) , we literally "can't" under existing law do it "faster than saying jackie robinson". There is no way the president can send military forces even if he/she wants to without the legislative branch's approval. You know full well what the law on the books says on such matters. Even when Japan attacked pearl harbor, we gathered congress to authorize military action afterwards.John wrote:** 24-Aug-2019 World View: Defending Taiwan
John wrote:** 23-Aug-2019 China attacks Taiwan
At any rate, if China attacks Taiwan, then America will defend
Taiwan.Yes we will. If China attacks Taiwan, then American warplanesCH86 wrote: > No we won't. Taiwan is not a real treaty ally, especially if China
> blockades rather than lands ground forces.
will be in the air and American warships will be mobilized
before you can say Jack Robinson.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, Those Who Remain
― G. Michael Hopf, Those Who Remain
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
Citing the Vietnam war as an example, AND saying that it was the right thing to do. Have you globalists learned absolutely nothing since the 1950s? The Vietnam war, which wrecked our social fabric throughout the west with the damage still being visible to this day. An obvious example of government overreach. Establishment TYRANTS need to learn how to share, YOU guys need to take responsibility, and when things do go wrong, you definitely need to STOP blaming everybody else for not slavishly agreeing with you guys. These days it is blatantly obvious that the American People HATE their ruling class.Tom Mazanec wrote:
Gee, CH86, I'm glad to know that Truman could not go into Korea, and Johnson could not go into Vietnam, without Congressional approval. Why if not for that there could be a wall in Washington DC with almost 60,000 names on it!
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/illiter ... ssion=true
Why would China want to attack the US now? All they have to do is wait for is this low IQ, non white demographic timebomb to finish exploding and we're done.
Face it Boomers Civil War comes....
Why would China want to attack the US now? All they have to do is wait for is this low IQ, non white demographic timebomb to finish exploding and we're done.
Face it Boomers Civil War comes....
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
Agree. I don't want to live in Mexico. Mexicans don't want to live there either. Mexicans just want to live off of the American taxpayer in the US. Mexicans aren't taking over America, they are destroying it. It's over.Millenial83 wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/illiter ... ssion=true
Why would China want to attack the US now? All they have to do is wait for is this low IQ, non white demographic timebomb to finish exploding and we're done.
Face it Boomers Civil War comes....
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
It's not over. Talk to me in 10 years after the 2nd American Civil War succeeds in making America American (white) again.Guest wrote:Agree. I don't want to live in Mexico. Mexicans don't want to live there either. Mexicans just want to live off of the American taxpayer in the US. Mexicans aren't taking over America, they are destroying it. It's over.Millenial83 wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/illiter ... ssion=true
Why would China want to attack the US now? All they have to do is wait for is this low IQ, non white demographic timebomb to finish exploding and we're done.
Face it Boomers Civil War comes....
Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
https://amp.economist.com/special-repor ... ssion=true
But please John, the smart but stupid Boomer, please tell me how we're all equal and "racism" is evil. Hahahaha
But please John, the smart but stupid Boomer, please tell me how we're all equal and "racism" is evil. Hahahaha
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests