Financial topics

[aeden]

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=hassan+nasral ... =hb&ia=web

We can assume two routes of currency direction about now.

The price of eggs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKfVxoPO_Qc

Iran cannot revitalize and the locals know it.
Tick tock and a bird disease catalyst.
As we seen organization collapse since Chavez.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/images6/da ... efense.jpg

Excess reserves is an obsolete term. Remember that "excess reserves" is an accounting concept, not a physical item. The physical item (asset) is deposits at Fed Res Banks. These deposits may be used to satisfy statutory reserve requirements; any "excess" deposits are labeled as "excess reserves." This terminology dates from the 1920s, and I find it obsolete. - Dr. Richard G. Anderson, the world's leading guru on IBDDs.
There are 6 seasonal, endogenous, economic inflection points each year. These seasonal factors are pre-determined by the FRB-NY’s "trading desk" operations, executing the FOMC's monetary policy directives (in the present case just reserve "smoothing" and “draining” operations, the oscillating inflows and outflows, the making and or receiving of interbank and correspondent bank payments by and large using their “free" excess reserve balances).
Every year, the seasonal factor's map (economic time series’ cyclical trend), or scientific proof, is demonstrated by the product of money flows, our means-of-payment money X’s its transaction’s velocity of circulation (the scientific method).
Monetary flows (volume X’s velocity) measures money flow’s impact on production, prices, and the economy (as flows are driven by payments: “bank debits”). It is an economic indicator (not necessarily an equity barometer). Rates-of-change Δ, in M*Vt = RoC’s Δ in AD, aggregate monetary purchasing power. Thus M*Vt serves as a “guide post” for N-gDp trajectories.
N-gDp is determined by the volume of goods & services coming on the market relative to the actual, transactions, flow of money. RoC's in R-gDp serves as a close proxy to RoC's in total physical transactions, T, that finance both goods and services. Then RoC's in P, represents the price level, or various RoC's in a group of prices and indices.
Monetary flows’ propagation, are a mathematically robust sequence of numbers (sigma Σ), neither neutral nor opaque, which pre-determine macro-economic momentum (the → “arrow of time” or "directionally sensitive time-frequency de-compositions").
For short-term money flows, the proxy for real-output, R-gDp, it's the rate of accumulation, a posteriori, that adds incrementally and immediately to its running total.
Its economic impact is defined by its rate-of-change, Δ "change in". The RoC, is the pace at which a variable changes, Δ, over that specific lag's established periodicity.
And Alfred Marshall's cash-balances approach (viz., a schedule of the amounts of money that will be offered at given levels of "P"), viz., where at times "K" is the reciprocal of Vt, or “K” has the dimension of a “storage period” and "bridges the gaps of transition periods" in Yale Professor Irving Fisher’s model.
As Nobel Laureate Dr. Ken Arrow says: “all analysis is a model”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4rZE_J1beA

Regards,

A. Taxpayer

[aeden]

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default ... k=0XB3dJDR

That is the stock trader’s most productive mantra. Here’s what it means, in case the economy of language common to this
vocation leaves you scratching your head:

http://www.saginawscholarships.com/a-u- ... g-in-iraq/

Guess who in the cognitive map of the unsaid in the collective delusion.

[aeden]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek wakey wakey cheerful idiots

[aeden]

Where Are They Now?

Also, there is no reason to worry about the influence of the Rothschilds. That money is long gone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhTMy9ma2mQ

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

bain mirror

[Higgenbotham]

Where Are They Now?

Also, there is no reason to worry about the influence of the Rothschilds. That money is long gone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhTMy9ma2mQ

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

bain mirror

The Rothschilds are fading away. This guy on youtube is talking about Genie Oil. With Genie, there is an 82 year old Rothschild on the advisory board of a microcap company. The Rothschilds may own a small percentage of the company which would amount to a few million, probably. If the Rothschilds owned a significant amount of a major oil company (or any company) it would be subject to public disclosure, the same way Buffett's investments or anybody else's are. There are no blocks of stock ownership of any significance to be found under the British branch of the Rothschilds so far as I know. The way people talk about the Rothschilds you would think they own a big block of Exxon or Apple or something like that.

Along the same lines, I saw a piece on CNBC a couple days ago that talked about David Rockefeller's personal effects going up for auction. With the death of David, the Rockefeller money is diffused over such a large number of heirs that my best guess is none of them would be worth more than a few tens of millions.

I'm sure with hundreds of family members in these clans there are a few who would like to resurrect their past glory and some who may be moderately successful because they are money people. If they're lucky there may be one that hits the mother lode and puts the family name back near the top of the Forbes list.

[thomasglee]

Also, there is no reason to worry about the influence of the Rothschilds. That money is long gone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhTMy9ma2mQ

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

bain mirror

The Rothschilds are fading away. This guy on youtube is talking about Genie Oil. With Genie, there is an 82 year old Rothschild on the advisory board of a microcap company. The Rothschilds may own a small percentage of the company which would amount to a few million, probably. If the Rothschilds owned a significant amount of a major oil company (or any company) it would be subject to public disclosure, the same way Buffett's investments or anybody else's are. There are no blocks of stock ownership of any significance to be found under the British branch of the Rothschilds so far as I know. The way people talk about the Rothschilds you would think they own a big block of Exxon or Apple or something like that.

Along the same lines, I saw a piece on CNBC a couple days ago that talked about David Rockefeller's personal effects going up for auction. With the death of David, the Rockefeller money is diffused over such a large number of heirs that my best guess is none of them would be worth more than a few tens of millions.

I'm sure with hundreds of family members in these clans there are a few who would like to resurrect their past glory and some who may be moderately successful because they are money people. If they're lucky there may be one that hits the mother lode and puts the family name back near the top of the Forbes list.

If I were a cynical man, I would argue the Rothschilds don't need to own stock when they own the banks that print the money that backs the stocks.

[Higgenbotham]

If I were a cynical man, I would argue the Rothschilds don't need to own stock when they own the banks that print the money that backs the stocks.

There's no evidence the Rothschilds own the Federal Reserve either (or any part of it). And the banks they own are as minor as the rest of their holdings. People who've put in incredible effort to find a current trail to the Rothschilds and who would like to can't find one. Something like Genie Oil is the best they can do.

What I find so interesting about this subject is that the Cargill family, whose company controls at least some of the food that almost every American eats on a given day, barely ever gets mentioned. And it's right out there front and center. Cargill is private, family owned and massive. They are in the grain markets daily.

[Higgenbotham]

Cargill family

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Cargill family is one of the wealthiest families in the world and as of 2016 was ranked as the fourth wealthiest family in America.[1] The family owns 90% of Cargill, the largest privately owned corporation in the United States.[2][3] The family members are the descendants of William W. Cargill,[3] who founded the company in Minnesota after the Civil War.

The exact wealth of the family is unknown, as the Cargill company is a privately owned business entity with no obligation to disclose exact ownership. At 14 in total according to Forbes estimates, the Cargill family has more billionaires among its members than any other family, which also makes them the family with the most wealthy members in history.[4] At least 14 members of the family are billionaires.[5]

[John]

The difference: Rothschild is Jewish, Cargill is not.

[Higgenbotham]

The difference: Rothschild is Jewish, Cargill is not.

I would guess less than 5% of Americans have ever heard of Cargill. You would think people would want to know more. I have no explanation any better than yours. Even in this forum, Cargill has barely been mentioned.