by gerald » Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:56 pm
Jagdish Shukla’s #RICO20 blunder may have opened the ‘largest science scandal in US history’
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/02/j ... s-history/
At issue is at least 63.5 million dollars from the National Science Foundation, and where it went, whether it was used for the purpose intended, and who benefited from that money. The problem at hand seems to be that there may have been more than a little “double dipping” going on with that grant money as Steve McIntyre pointed out in Shukla’s Gold:
Andrew Dessler, who, like most climate academics, has consistently denied that research funding has any impact on alarmism,
Jagdish Shukla’s #RICO20 blunder may have opened the ‘largest science scandal in US history’
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/02/jagadish-shuklas-rico20-blunder-may-have-opened-the-largest-science-scandal-in-us-history/
At issue is at least 63.5 million dollars from the National Science Foundation, and where it went, whether it was used for the purpose intended, and who benefited from that money. The problem at hand seems to be that there may have been more than a little “double dipping” going on with that grant money as Steve McIntyre pointed out in Shukla’s Gold:
Andrew Dessler, who, like most climate academics, has consistently denied that research funding has any impact on alarmism,