DNA

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: DNA

Re: DNA

by gerald » Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:14 pm

A DNA up date - movement toward a change in perspective, - regarding the "alien skull" - and a brief comment on the resistance to the information.

http://www.sandhedsseminar.dk/

Re: DNA

by hunterG7343 » Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:26 am

gerald wrote:There is an ancient Babylon story "the Epic of Gilgamesh " it is about a king and his exploits .http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/M ... fGilgamesh
In the epic, it is claimed he was 2/3 rds god and 1/3 rd mortal. Why would an ancient epic make such a unusual statement? wouldn't it be half, or a quarter?

Maybe this could explain the 2/3rds -1/3rd dilemma

This skull appears to be 1/3 human based upon DNA
watch the video

http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2010.htm
Interested thing you have noticed :) You really tickled my brain with it. There is a bunch of stuff that the ancient books have told but we haven't heard it.

Re: DNA

by gerald » Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:01 am

Update

A geneticist technical abstract

http://www.starchildproject.com/abstract.htm

"The probability that such a highly specific arrangement of changes in a small fragment could have occurred by accumulation of sequencing errors is extremely low, if not close to zero. Nor could this arrangement have occurred due to contamination with the DNA of any known species. From this evidence one may conclude that the underlying biochemistry of the entity’s life form must be either the same as, or highly similar to, humans or other species. Yet, the use of the genetic code, which still remains universal, is distinctively different, implying that this life form is very likely the result of a markedly variant and non-intersecting evolutionary process."

Re: DNA

by gerald » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:19 am

An up date on the skull, a good presentation of why the "Starchild" skull is most likely non-terrestrial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vz0-1xZ ... playnext=1

Re: DNA

by gerald » Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:13 pm

Attached is a link to an update on the genetic analysis of the "starchild" skull. Providing a more substantial indication that the skull is non terrestrial.
http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2012.htm

There is also an interesting article on that site regarding a meeting held in the Vatican in November of 2009
regarding the Vatican, UFO's and alien disclosure.

http://www.starchildproject.com/vaticanufo.htm

Re: DNA

by gerald » Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:53 am

Dear John:

Never thought of it that way, I look at human society and much/most of it appears wrong. Something is not right, but I am not sure what it is.

Re: DNA

by John » Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:15 am

Dear Gerald,
gerald wrote: > Have you ever been on land somewhere where there is NO sign of
> human habitation except the empty road on which you are driving?
> I have experienced this several times,it is an experience that is
> difficult to describe, but I love it. However this feeling is so
> because I know I CAN get back to civilization. For if I couldn't I
> would be looking at death. Interesting.
Is your love of desolate, uncivilized landscapes related to your
unique beliefs about extraterrestrials?

John

Re: DNA

by gerald » Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:42 am

John:
Thanks,
Have you ever been on land somewhere where there is NO sign of human habitation except the empty road on which you are driving? I have experienced this several times,it is an experience that is difficult to describe, but I love it. However this feeling is so because I know I CAN get back to civilization. For if I couldn't I would be looking at death. Interesting.

Re: DNA

by John » Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:26 am

Gerald - Glad to see that you've escaped the sand storms,
brush fires and flies.

John

Re: DNA

by gerald » Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:20 am

An updated analysis of the skull's genetics.

A quote from the report.

"Nonetheless, based on the preliminary results now in hand, our research team is very confident that when the Starchild’s entire genome is recovered and sequenced, the total number of confirmed differences will be so staggering that it can only lead to a conclusion that the Starchild represents an entirely new humanoid species, and that species is “alien."

The introduction to the summery report

https://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=en&shv ... 1bdbf2481f

The summery report

http://www.starchildproject.com/DNA2011March.htm#1

Top