by Cool Breeze » Sun Jul 11, 2021 4:19 pm
John wrote: ↑Wed Jul 07, 2021 6:54 pm
** 07-Jul-2021 World View: The Feminized Society
tim wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:12 pm
> Experience hardship and challenging environments now while you can
> expose yourself to them in artificial conditions and retreat to
> the comforts of modern living as needed. Sleep outside in the
> winter, live for a time without hot running water, experiment with
> fasting for days at a time, etc.
> Why we are the WEAKEST generation of all time
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBU_ujMLaSU
Guest wrote: ↑Sun Jul 04, 2021 6:46 am
> Most of the women in the Bay Area are soft and weak, cosseted and
> naive despite their claims of worldliness, and generally full of
> shit. They have their self-regarding entitlement feminism, and
> ceaselessly vaunt their independence, but the reality is, come the
> epidemic plague or foreign invasion, they’d become precisely the
> sort of useless baggage you’d trade for a box of shotgun shells or
> a jerry can of diesel.
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed Jul 07, 2021 5:52 pm
> The culture is a feminized one, so this largely is applicable to
> the average "mass man" of the USA. Given the empirical nature of
> humans, we are approaching carrying capacity, since it seems to
> much of that has absolutely nothing to do with food and physical
> environments, rather social and religious (lack thereof)
> ones.
I have a theory about this.
In the natural order of things, there are slightly more males born
than females. This makes sense, because males are more likely to
be killed in war than females, so it's better in the grand picture
to have the birth lottery slightly in favor of males.
So right after a generational crisis war, there are usually going to
be more females than males, since a lot of the males will have been
killed off during the war. Since the females have to compete for the
smaller number of males, this gives the males an advantage, and so
society is more masculine. This is also the time when polygamy
becomes acceptable, since having unattached women walking around is
bad for society and dangerous for the women.
But as the years go by, the number of males increases relative to the
number of females, so the males have to compete for the smaller number
of females. Even as early as the generational Awakening era, you have
girls running the show by burning their bras and such. By the time of
the Crisis era, women have a lot more power than men, and so the
society is, as you describe, "feminized."
Once the next crisis war kills off a bunch of males, the society
becomes masculine again.
I believe that in general, yes, John is accurate in this analysis. In the Fate of Empires by Sir John Glubb, however, he indicates that the eventual decline of societies is indicated by many things, but one thing they all share is ascendancy of women. Women by nature have no power, it is not a natural characteristic of theirs, so chaos ensues when this happens because the responsible (or ones that should be) power brokers are men. Typically what happens though is that with many men around, they sell out attention, resources and make "deals" with women to get access --- since most men can't actually physically and characteristic wise compare with the top men. This is what's been going on in America as well since the last 70 years has supported many people with bad upbringing, little to no family (the gov't became the dad, best abuse example being blacks), medical technology has kept many relatively weak people alive, etc. Oh yeah, and no wars, which is the main topic here, ha
[quote=John post_id=62415 time=1625698477 user_id=53]
[color=blue][size=120][b]** 07-Jul-2021 World View: The Feminized Society[/b][/size][/color]
[quote=tim post_id=62253 time=1625083968 user_id=2211]
> Experience hardship and challenging environments now while you can
> expose yourself to them in artificial conditions and retreat to
> the comforts of modern living as needed. Sleep outside in the
> winter, live for a time without hot running water, experiment with
> fasting for days at a time, etc.
> Why we are the WEAKEST generation of all time
> [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBU_ujMLaSU[/url]
[/quote]
[quote=Guest post_id=62338 time=1625395616]
> Most of the women in the Bay Area are soft and weak, cosseted and
> naive despite their claims of worldliness, and generally full of
> shit. They have their self-regarding entitlement feminism, and
> ceaselessly vaunt their independence, but the reality is, come the
> epidemic plague or foreign invasion, they’d become precisely the
> sort of useless baggage you’d trade for a box of shotgun shells or
> a jerry can of diesel.[/quote]
[quote="Cool Breeze" post_id=62411 time=1625694774 use_id=3066]
> The culture is a feminized one, so this largely is applicable to
> the average "mass man" of the USA. Given the empirical nature of
> humans, we are approaching carrying capacity, since it seems to
> much of that has absolutely nothing to do with food and physical
> environments, rather social and religious (lack thereof)
> ones.[/quote]
I have a theory about this.
In the natural order of things, there are slightly more males born
than females. This makes sense, because males are more likely to
be killed in war than females, so it's better in the grand picture
to have the birth lottery slightly in favor of males.
So right after a generational crisis war, there are usually going to
be more females than males, since a lot of the males will have been
killed off during the war. Since the females have to compete for the
smaller number of males, this gives the males an advantage, and so
society is more masculine. This is also the time when polygamy
becomes acceptable, since having unattached women walking around is
bad for society and dangerous for the women.
But as the years go by, the number of males increases relative to the
number of females, so the males have to compete for the smaller number
of females. Even as early as the generational Awakening era, you have
girls running the show by burning their bras and such. By the time of
the Crisis era, women have a lot more power than men, and so the
society is, as you describe, "feminized."
Once the next crisis war kills off a bunch of males, the society
becomes masculine again.
[/quote]
I believe that in general, yes, John is accurate in this analysis. In the Fate of Empires by Sir John Glubb, however, he indicates that the eventual decline of societies is indicated by many things, but one thing they all share is ascendancy of women. Women by nature have no power, it is not a natural characteristic of theirs, so chaos ensues when this happens because the responsible (or ones that should be) power brokers are men. Typically what happens though is that with many men around, they sell out attention, resources and make "deals" with women to get access --- since most men can't actually physically and characteristic wise compare with the top men. This is what's been going on in America as well since the last 70 years has supported many people with bad upbringing, little to no family (the gov't became the dad, best abuse example being blacks), medical technology has kept many relatively weak people alive, etc. Oh yeah, and no wars, which is the main topic here, ha