ColoradoPlainsman wrote:
> They refused to post your article?!?!?! I was trying to find it
> on the BB website but gave up after awhile; I like to add my 2
> cents worth in the comment section. And then they hit you with an
> Bitcoin ad, which, considering, they have had a host of articles
> that were very pro bitcoin. My own research left me a bit
> bewildered and that makes me real cautious. Thanks for the info
> and the research, as always.
You're welcome.
Well, as you know, that's the way the world works these days. When
you told your boss that the subprime mortgages your firm was writing
were fraudulent, you got fired. In 2006, anyone who suggested a
housing bubble was sidelined. I remember in 2007, watching a Ben
Bernanke press conference live on CNBC, when someone asked Bernanke
whether he feared another 1929-type crash, CNBC immediately cut away
to commercial, because it was against CNBC policy to mention the 1929
crash. It was really a farce. The whole Cassandra-Jeremiah-Churchill
syndrome that I've described means that most of the things that I
write about are shunned and hated by 99% of the people. They don't
hate it because they know it's false. They hate it because a part of
their brains know it's true, and they're shutting it out.
So Breitbart has bitcoin advertisers and so the editorial policy
follows the advertisers. That's the way the world works. What else
is new?