Generational Dynamics World View News

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Generational Dynamics World View News

Re: Tucker Carlson: Trump has become an imperialist because he believes a major war is coming

by Navigator » Sun Jan 11, 2026 1:43 pm

FullMoon wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 8:25 pm
DaKardii wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 5:21 pm Link to the monologue below. Keep in mind that it is over 40 minutes long.

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-mono-jan-7

During the monologue, Carlson implies that China will be our main adversary in this war. He also says Russia is the key to determining who will win. Which is why Trump abandoning NATO/Ukraine and making nice with Russia should take top priority. If Trump fails to break Russia away from China, we will lose. Only if he succeeds will we have a chance.
John's analysis as to the Russian side was correct. It depends on how much they and Europe can make amends. At current levels that will take a long time and certainly be in China's favor. The European/Russian rivalry would be best wound down. There is no existential conflict between Russia and Europe. Europe got themselves into a hole by doing similar but much worse than we did. We have lots of options but what have they. We cut their pipeline and they don't even have cheap energy now.
I think that Tucker Carlson is completely in the tank for Russia. The idea of making Russia into a US ally against China is ludicrous. Russia is an aggressor and a full on partner with China.

I have always disagreed with John's take on Russia, and after Putin's invasion of Ukraine I believe that John changed his mind.

European/Russian rivalry is not going to wind down. It is only going to get worse. After the Ukraine, Russia wants the Baltics. Then they want their influence in Eastern Europe back. Russian ambitions are all aimed westward. Russia may actually cede territory in the far east to China in return for assistance in getting more European lands. I believe we will see this when WW3 starts.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Sun Jan 11, 2026 1:38 pm

tim wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 11:06 am
‘Greenland belongs to its people’: European leaders unite over Trump’s threats to annex territory
European leaders urge Trump to respect Greenland’s borders
Stephen Miller Asserts U.S. Has Right to Take Greenland
While I certainly am fully in agreement (and then some) regarding Trumps actions vis a vis Iran and Venezuela, I am deeply worried about his rhetoric concerning Greenland, and NATO, as well as his significant reduction in the US backing of Ukraine.

Yes, Greenland is strategic. We have a base there (Thun). We could offer to greatly bolster our presence, and pay Greenland/Denmark for the privilege. We could even buy Greenland (btw, Truman tried to do this shortly after WW2). Hopefully Trump's rhetoric is meant to have one of these things happen.

Actually invading Greenland would activate NATO against the US, which would be a disaster of monumental proportions. NATO is still extremely important, especially in the face of Russian aggression. I think we should tone down the anti-NATO rhetoric a notch or two. Trump has been successful in getting the Europeans to increase defense spending somewhat, and the fear of Russia, especially for Poland and northern Europe is motivating them as well.

Trump Executive Control

by Navigator » Sun Jan 11, 2026 1:28 pm

tim wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 12:30 pm https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/e ... -a-wartime
Edward Dowd: Trump is Building a Wartime Command Economy Without Declaring War

"This is a test run. He is setting precedent to apply this model across sectors..."
Trump is building a wartime command economy without declaring war.

He’s not trying to reform the defense sector. He’s preparing to subsume it. Strip the optics. What he’s doing is establishing direct state control over strategic capital flow using loyalty pressure, populist framing, and fiscal levers.

He’s not negotiating with defense executives. He’s declaring them subordinate.

This is a test run. He is setting precedent to apply this model across sectors:

•Energy will be next.
•AI after that.
•Healthcare eventually.

The pattern is simple. Any industry touching sovereignty, logistics, or frontier technology will be absorbed under mission-state logic. Private firms will still hold the equity, but the state will dictate the capital structure, production cadence, and narrative frame.

Buybacks are forbidden. Dividends are conditional. Salaries are capped. Output is mandatory. Time is compressed.

It’s a shift from incentive alignment to compliance enforcement. From persuasion to control. From “make defense great again” to “you now work for me.”


No modern president has dared cross this line because it exposes how thin the veil of corporate independence actually is when national purpose is invoked.

Trump just crossed it.

And the deeper layer: this only works if he’s confident the military, capital markets, and the public will comply. That’s the real signal. He knows they will. Or he knows enough of them will that the others won’t matter.

This is how American Caesarism starts.

Not with tanks in the streets.

With cash flow commands.
I applaud Trump going after the defense contractors and putting them on notice. But I don't think he is going to put all of industry/commerce under executive control.

Unless there is a real shooting war, in which case EVERYTHING will have to be put under some kind of governmental control (and this would be the care regardless of who is president)

Re: Tucker Carlson: Trump has become an imperialist because he believes a major war is coming

by FullMoon » Sat Jan 10, 2026 8:25 pm

DaKardii wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 5:21 pm Link to the monologue below. Keep in mind that it is over 40 minutes long.

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-mono-jan-7

During the monologue, Carlson implies that China will be our main adversary in this war. He also says Russia is the key to determining who will win. Which is why Trump abandoning NATO/Ukraine and making nice with Russia should take top priority. If Trump fails to break Russia away from China, we will lose. Only if he succeeds will we have a chance.
John's analysis as to the Russian side was correct. It depends on how much they and Europe can make amends. At current levels that will take a long time and certainly be in China's favor. The European/Russian rivalry would be best wound down. There is no existential conflict between Russia and Europe. Europe got themselves into a hole by doing similar but much worse than we did. We have lots of options but what have they. We cut their pipeline and they don't even have cheap energy now.

Tucker Carlson: Trump has become an imperialist because he believes a major war is coming

by DaKardii » Sat Jan 10, 2026 5:21 pm

Link to the monologue below. Keep in mind that it is over 40 minutes long.

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-mono-jan-7

During the monologue, Carlson implies that China will be our main adversary in this war. He also says Russia is the key to determining who will win. Which is why Trump abandoning NATO/Ukraine and making nice with Russia should take top priority. If Trump fails to break Russia away from China, we will lose. Only if he succeeds will we have a chance.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by tim » Sat Jan 10, 2026 12:30 pm

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/e ... -a-wartime
Edward Dowd: Trump is Building a Wartime Command Economy Without Declaring War

"This is a test run. He is setting precedent to apply this model across sectors..."
Trump is building a wartime command economy without declaring war.

He’s not trying to reform the defense sector. He’s preparing to subsume it. Strip the optics. What he’s doing is establishing direct state control over strategic capital flow using loyalty pressure, populist framing, and fiscal levers.

He’s not negotiating with defense executives. He’s declaring them subordinate.

This is a test run. He is setting precedent to apply this model across sectors:

•Energy will be next.
•AI after that.
•Healthcare eventually.

The pattern is simple. Any industry touching sovereignty, logistics, or frontier technology will be absorbed under mission-state logic. Private firms will still hold the equity, but the state will dictate the capital structure, production cadence, and narrative frame.

Buybacks are forbidden. Dividends are conditional. Salaries are capped. Output is mandatory. Time is compressed.

It’s a shift from incentive alignment to compliance enforcement. From persuasion to control. From “make defense great again” to “you now work for me.”

No modern president has dared cross this line because it exposes how thin the veil of corporate independence actually is when national purpose is invoked.

Trump just crossed it.

And the deeper layer: this only works if he’s confident the military, capital markets, and the public will comply. That’s the real signal. He knows they will. Or he knows enough of them will that the others won’t matter.

This is how American Caesarism starts.

Not with tanks in the streets.

With cash flow commands.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Trevor » Fri Jan 09, 2026 4:50 pm

NATO's finally hit the 2% mark for their own defense. We've been griping and muttering for a long time that they weren't willing to contribute enough. Harsh as I know this sounds, I don't think they ever would have unless we cut them off from aid entirely. Which is what Trump's done, save for having them purchase weapons to give to Ukraine, a far cry from taking the lead.

Problem is: Europe faces enormous political and economic obstacles to standing on their own. They haven't done so for at least 35 years (arguably 80, although Western Europe invested a lot more during the Cold War) Defense industries are hollowed out and that's not something you can quickly rebuild. Poland's done more than anyone else, spending 4.6% of GDP on defense, but even for them, it's proving a difficult process. They've got aging populations, the highest tax burden in the world, and NATO is not by any means united. Not everyone sees Russia as an imminent threat, sometimes not even a distant one.
XXXXXXXXXX

Trump's operation in Venezuela has gone smoother than I ever expected. I don't doubt some of Maduro's underlings sold him out, either for power or merely to save their own hides; possibly both. Latin America has a lot of corruption, but they don't possess the religious fanaticism of the Middle East. Admittedly, he could still bungle it, so I'm not setting up the fireworks yet.

I've noticed the protests have been rather muted. Yes, there are some, but they're the ones who complain about anything we do. Even in Latin America and Venezuela itself, people are cheering. Few are going to shed any tears for the likes of Maduro, given everyone knows he's a dictator who seized power. He even dared us to do something about it. Cuba gets a lot of its oil and supplies from Venezuela, so that's gone. China gets some of their oil there, and Maduro was Russia's ally.

I don't expect it'll transition to a democracy, but if we're lucky, it'll be in our orbit. As Cold War logic went: "He's a bastard, but he's our bastard."

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Fri Jan 09, 2026 2:39 pm

tim wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 11:10 am Iran is in an awakening era, where the younger generation is seeking to take power and install their own values in the country.
I'm afraid that it will take an armed revolt in any country currently (or just recently) rules by a dictator. The people in power (or, in the case of Mexico and similar places, wielding the power from the shadows), and their multitude of minions, are not going to just go away. All of their wealth (or for the minions, their handouts) comes from being in power . They are not going to "en masse" just go away. The regular people who are oppressed by these overlords are going to have to meet the violence that is/is going to be unleashed on them with similar violence.

This holds for Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Mexico, and so on. The most recent example was what it took to get rid of Assad in Syria.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by Navigator » Fri Jan 09, 2026 2:31 pm

Given that Ukraine is holding off Russia, I would have them way up on the list of lesser powers.

I would also give Poland as much or more power than current France and maybe even Germany.

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

by DaKardii » Thu Jan 08, 2026 5:23 pm

Well, it's that time of year again! Here are the top 20 most powerful countries going into 2026.

SUPERPOWERS
1. United States
2. China

GREAT POWERS
3. Japan
4. Germany
5. France
6. India
7. United Kingdom
8. Russia

LESSER POWERS
9. Brazil
10. Canada
11. Italy
12. South Korea
13. Australia
14. Saudi Arabia
15. Spain
16. Turkey
17. Netherlands
18. Indonesia
19. Mexico
20. Israel

Source: https://korbel.du.edu/pardee/download-ifs/

Top