Generational theory, international history and current events
Skip to content
by FullMoon » Fri Jul 18, 2025 11:12 am
by Jack Edwards » Fri Jul 18, 2025 9:35 am
In this episode of Inconvenient Truths, Jennifer Jung analyzes a stunning statement by China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who publicly admitted that China “cannot afford” a Russian defeat in the Ukraine war. This admission broke with China’s claimed neutrality and revealed its deeper geopolitical motives. The comment, rather than being a diplomatic error, was likely a calculated message to reassure Vladimir Putin following a defection by a CCP official who leaked secret Chinese plans for what to do if the Putin regime collapses. The defector, fleeing to Russia after internal conflicts, handed over a CCP contingency plan detailing two responses: 1) supporting a communist-led Russian government to rebuild a pan-European communist alliance, or 2) backing the creation of an “Eastern Russian Federation” under Chinese influence east of the Urals, while using Siberia as a military and energy buffer in preparation for war over Taiwan. Russia responded by returning the defector and issuing a chilling diplomatic message emphasizing that it remains a “strong existence” protected by nuclear weapons capable of annihilating any enemy. This was a clear signal to both allies and adversaries that any interference in Russia’s sovereignty or regime stability would come with the threat of nuclear consequences. Additionally, part of China’s developing strategic agreement with Russia reportedly includes cooperation in the Arctic, where Russia would help China establish nuclear submarine launch positions—giving the CCP new reach to threaten Western targets and strengthen deterrence ahead of a potential Taiwan conflict. A key driver behind China’s continued support for Russia is fear that Putin, if abandoned, might pivot toward the United States—potentially even forging an alliance with a future Trump administration. This geopolitical shift would isolate China and undermine its strategic plans in both Europe and Asia. The overarching message is clear: all of China’s recent geopolitical maneuvers—including its support for Russia—are ultimately aimed at preparing for a potential invasion of Taiwan. Whether by drawing U.S. attention to Europe, securing Siberian territory, or coordinating nuclear deterrence strategy with Moscow, Beijing’s long-term strategy centers on dominating Taiwan and shifting global power in its favor. The fate of Taiwan, according to Jung, represents a pivotal struggle between democracy and authoritarianism that could define the future of the 21st century.
by FullMoon » Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:35 pm
Navigator wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:05 pm I am perfectly fine with us doing everything possible to help the Israelis and everything possible to hurt the Iranians. Israel exists because everyone hates the jews, the area is where they are from (pre-dating Arabs), and the US has always and should always be their friend and protector.
by Navigator » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:10 pm
by Navigator » Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:05 pm
by FullMoon » Sun Jul 06, 2025 1:58 pm
by FullMoon » Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:11 pm
Jack Edwards wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:21 am Fullmoon said: Didn't John say that Bannon was a student of GD or some form of generational theory? Looks like a good student who understands. Bannon did a film documentary on Generational Dynamics many years ago. I remember John apologizing for skipping one of his daily analysis posts because he was busy with "something". At a different time, somebody suggested in Trump's first term that John ought to get involved since he was so tight with Bannon, to which he said his usual "If I was in the whitehouse I would just tell people what I think and wouldn't shut up and they would fire me" (paraphrased). In John's opinion Bannon definitely understood GD, and had likely informed others in the Whitehouse about it. John once emailed Bannon as he was catching some flack to keep his chin up and not let the turkeys get him down and he posted Bannon's reply which was short and about what you'd expect. John once commented that Bannon was often on one of his windmill tilting crusades. My personal view is there is something shady about Bannon and he's all about self agrandizement. Regards, Jack
Didn't John say that Bannon was a student of GD or some form of generational theory? Looks like a good student who understands.
by Jack Edwards » Wed Jul 02, 2025 9:21 am
by Bob Butler » Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:29 am
by FullMoon » Tue Jul 01, 2025 4:59 pm
Top