Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 21, 2025 9:01 am

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/f ... say-theyre
Flu Shot Revolt: Troops Say They’re Being Crushed for Refusing ‘Unlawful Orders’

“President Trump and Defense Secretary Hegseth are giving the illusion that they are trying to make it right—but soldiers say their careers are being destroyed.”
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/i ... pediatrics
INSANITY: American Academy of Pediatrics Demands All Infants Be Vaccinated for COVID— Even Against Parents’ Will!

Pediatricians push mRNA jabs for babies as young as 6 months, fueling outrage over parental rights and Big Pharma influence.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/b ... rchers-tie
BREAKING: Russian Researchers Tie mRNA Rollout to Alarming Rise in Cancer Cases

Groundbreaking Russian research links mass vaccination to unexpected surge in cases and deaths.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 21, 2025 8:59 am

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.co ... vaccinated
Houston, We Have Another Problem: Unvaccinated Children Born of Past-Vaccination Mothers, Despite Never Contracting Covid...Are Dying Now at 77% Excess - a 24 Sigma Event

Before we get to the horrifying data that once again proves that these Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccines” are genetically modifying future generations, even if they are not directly injected with these EUA poisons, let us briefly review a grim statistic for those demographics that did get these democide shots:

Image

As predicted by this Substack years ago, this disability trend, directly in line with VAIDS symptoms that are increasingly expressing themselves across all age groups, even ones that historically never came down with diseases such as (turbo) cancer, will only get worse.

And now let us review the gene altering implications of these murderous “vaccines” in the newly born and unborn alike…

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 21, 2025 8:58 am

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com ... to-tiffany
So what did really happen to Tiffany Dover?

The story of the nurse who collapsed on live TV after being given one of the first Covid Pfizer shots
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/new ... eric-polio
New Bill Gates-Funded Chimeric Polio Vaccine for Children Sheds 100% in Recipients, Spread Documented: 'The Lancet' Journal

Frankenstein pathogen cobbled from multiple viruses gained genetic stability, meaning scientists rewired its genome with an unnatural trait no wild poliovirus has.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-am ... atrics-ed2
The American "Academy" of Pediatrics has published its own recommendations for a childhood vax schedule.

Doctors who follow it will be surprised to learn they may not be shielded from liability, and parents may get hefty bills in the mail.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 21, 2025 8:55 am

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/th ... -continues
The death cult continues hunting pregnant women and newborns. Moderna's CMV vaccine will be approved soon.


The strategy of eugenics and population control by “public health”, aka, poisoning by “vaccines” is not new, and mothers and children have always been its target. The “death care” drive to poison babies before they are born or on the first day of their life at the latest continues unabated, and yes, it is a critical agenda item that spans every administration, regardless of political party in charge. To recap just the most recent iterations, starting with Trump’s Operation Warp Speed:

Early 2020: OWS mRNA vaccine development contracts specifically mentioned 4 million pregnant women in the US as a target, ahem, “for protection”, obviously. This was months before any non-evidence that SARS-Cov2 poses risk to pregnancy was compiled by the poisoners at CDC. I covered this non-evidence here. SARS-Cov2 (whatever that was) never posed any special risk to pregnant women, but the CDC still insists that it does, and insists that ALL pregnant women be shot with mRNA, per current FDA and CDC MAHA policy.

The mRNA injections were never “officially” tested for safety in pregnancy. The strategy was to officially exclude pregnant women from clinical trials (which is the norm in drug development), but then “accidentally” get thousands of them injected anyway, collect the data and study the carnage, then lie about it to the public, coercing and manipulating pregnant women into injections at every turn. Examples of this include the infamous Shimabukuro et al study using fraudulent math. Applying the correct math showed 80%+ miscarriage rate and 300% increase in stillbirths in that dataset.

Note that JikkyLeaks, Arkmedic, Saidi, horse gambler OpenVAET + the assorted mouse crew (all of them have multiple online personas) try to misrepresent this finding and manipulate the public opinion away from it, by piling on other extraneous data. That’s bullshit. A published study is a dataset on its own, and it’s proper re-analysis is the way to demonstrate fraud on the public. Jikky crew are liars on behalf of the criminal cartel, don’t fall for their tactics.

As I published in my review of Moderna’s animal studies submitted to the FDA and FOIAed in 2022, reproductive toxicity study in pregnant rats showed extreme maternal toxicity and fetal malformations. Moderna admitted to statistically significant increase in fetal skeletal malformations:


The skeletal malformations were temporally associated to the days when highest toxicity was observed in the mothers: “Maternal toxicity in the form of clinical observations was observed for 5 days following the last dose (GD 13), correlating with the most sensitive period for rib development in rats (GDs 14 to 17)”.

The FDA included the following statement in the Basis for Regulatory Action Summary document (Section 4: Non-clinical Reproductive Toxicology, p.14):

“No vaccine-related fetal malformations or variations and no adverse effect on postnatal development were observed in the study. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the pre-fusion stabilized spike protein antigen following immunization were observed in maternal samples and F1 generation rats indicating transfer of antibodies from mother to fetus and from mother to nursing pups.”

I discussed this fact with RFK Jr on his podcast in 2022. The lie from the FDA is still there, they have not retracted it even though he is in charge of the agency now!

The CDC schedule today includes RSV shots for ALL pregnant women. Three vaxxes are approved for RSV, one of them - Moderna - is mRNA, discussed here. The others are just as poisonous. Robert Malone and Martin Kuldorff, new, MAHA co-chairs of ACIP just voted in the monoclonal antibody for RSV for ALL newborns whose mothers were not shot with RSV, which is “belt and suspenders” strategy, I guess. The RSV mAb for babies is an atrocity that killed more babies in clinical trials vs. whatever other poison was used as a “control”. Discussed in this post.

Let’s not forget that MAHA-FDA approved the new Moderna shot mNexspike based on no placebo controlled trials and no long term safety. This is discussed in this post. In the same post I discussed the soon-to-be-approved Arcturus self-amplifying RNA shot (without placebo controlled trial, naturally), and quoted report from Conspiracy Sarah on the $500M going to Jeffrey Taubenberger’s gold standard universal poison using BPL, and I separately discussed it here. All of these will be pushed on pregnant women per Makary-Prasad “new” mRNA policy.

You probably know this already - Prasad is back at the FDA as head of CBER, after a week of “spending more time with his family”. Does it mean he hates his family and wants to spend more time with the FDA?

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 21, 2025 8:52 am

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/ ... a-cure-for
The Red Cross Suppressed A Cure For Malaria in 2012, Causing Over Half A Million People To Die Every Year Since

More evidence that international health care organizations (and all governmental health care and regulatory agencies) are fully captured by Big Pharma.
The Red Cross Malaria Trial

“The Water Reference Center (WRC)” is a research center within the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). In 2012, their CEO at the time, Klaas Proesmans, conducted a study testing the efficacy of a common water purification agent called chlorine dioxide to treat malaria. The treatment consisted of increasing the concentration in cups of drinking water to levels above those typically used solely for water purification. Note that this effective treatment was first accidentally discovered by an applied scientist working in Nigeria in 1982, as I reported in this prior post.

In that study, the WRC and the Ugandan Red Cross identified 154 patients from the community around Iganga, Uganda, using skin pricks to gather drops of blood from patients suspected of being ill with malaria. They then placed the blood on slides and examined them under a microscope to look for the malaria parasite. Then they treated the patients who were positive for malaria by giving them cups of water to drink that had been treated with chlorine dioxide in the form of what Jim Humble called “Master Mineral Solution” (a mixture of sodium chlorite and hydrochloric acid). They then had the patients return to the testing/study center daily for re-testing and clinical follow-up.

They rapidly cured 154 malaria patients within two days. Sounds historic, right? A cure for malaria had been found! But no, it was not to be. Not even close.

As word of the trial and its success began to circulate, the “authorities” sprang into action, culminating in the Ugandan Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) issuing statements denying any official involvement in the study. They then went even further, stating that no formal clinical trial or endorsement of MMS took place under their auspices. The IFRC also added that “chlorine dioxide is not approved for the treatment of malaria and that any suggestion of Red Cross involvement was misleading.” They even got the CEO of the Water Reference Center who had planned and conducted the trial… to deny it ever happened.

Interestingly, none of the statements above were published in an official Press Release or statement; they were instead communicated solely via quotes in an interview with an investigative journalist in a blatantly obvious “debunking article” published by Business Insider.

First, I will review the extensive evidence verifying both the conduct and results of that trial. Then I will cover the above “Disinformation Response” from the media and the Red Cross in more detail. However, to understand the importance of the documented evidence that I will provide below, you need to know that the Business Insider article tried to “debunk” the claim that the trial was done by: 1) claiming it never took place, and 2) that Red Cross officials were “duped” into taking part. Yes, I know, the argument contradicts itself - either the trial never took place or Red Cross officials were “duped” into taking part, you can’t have both. Later, you will see how they later reconciled those two statements.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 14, 2025 12:46 pm

As far as I know China still has not used any mRNA vaccines on their people.

Despite Chinese presence all over pharmaceutical companies and manufacturing, its curious that China never used mRNA on the Chinese people.

Do they know something we don't? The Chinese are able to reverse engineer almost everything made by the U.S. but was unable to come up with the mRNA technology?

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/18/busi ... cines.html
But two years into the pandemic, China’s 1.4 billion people still don’t have access to one of the most effective coronavirus vaccines the world has to offer. Those vaccines use the breakthrough mRNA technology that was developed and approved in the West, and they have been embraced by dozens of countries.

The effectiveness of Chinese vaccines has been in doubt — partly because they use a century-old method for inoculation. Last spring, the country said it would approve BioNTech, the German mRNA shot made in partnership with Pfizer. Months later, China said that it was also close to producing its own mRNA vaccine. Neither are available today.

https://www.reuters.com/business/health ... 024-04-19/
Robert Langer, an MIT engineer who was a co-founder of Moderna, told Reuters he expected Moderna and "possibly" BioNTech (22UAy.DE), opens new tab to dominate mRNA medicines for the next five to 10 years.

Langer cited Moderna's "huge technological and IP (intellectual property) advantages" and its headstart on the long timeframes needed to conduct clinical trials for new products.

A former Stemirna executive, Frank Zhang, said China's pharmaceutical industry cannot compete with innovative companies abroad because of gaps in technology, talent and ideas.

"A company able to gain market share in the U.S. is the only company with actual strength," Zhang, who led part of Stemirna's COVID vaccine R&D efforts, told Reuters.

Walvax has gained knowledge about large-scale production technology, and funding was not likely to be a problem for it or CSPC, given that both are listed companies selling other products, said Abogen's CEO Ying Bo, a former Moderna scientist.

But Ying said the long timeframes for researching, developing and winning approvals for mRNA vaccines pose a big challenge for China’s developers.
"Time is always the biggest enemy to biotech," Ying said.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 14, 2025 12:39 pm

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... -4-11-2025
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, August 4-11, 2025

Actors Kelley Mack (33, C), Lina Bina (24), Jeffrey Louis Starr, Jon Miyahara; film designer Derrick Kardos; rockers Bobby Whitlock, Jill Lisson, Alon Cohen; NAACP leader Joseph Darby (74, C); & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID "vaccination," based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Thu Aug 14, 2025 12:34 pm

https://supersally.substack.com/p/singa ... -as-deaths
Singapore Births in Freefall as Deaths Remain at Post-Covid-19 Vaccine "New Normal" High. Natural Monthly Population Growth (Births - Deaths) Drops from 424 in January to only 87 by June 2025.

Chinese Singaporeans have negative and rapidly worsening population loss. C-19 vaccine recommendation restricted to elderly and medically vulnerable. Others may still take a vaccine "if they wish".
2nd Quarter Vital Statistics data on births and deaths just released out of Singapore show that the Island State is in trouble with their population. The gap between births and deaths has dropped from 1,388 in January 2019 to 578 in January 2023, to 424 in January 2025, and to 87 in June 2025!
Image
This loss of natural population growth is driven partially by deaths which have maintained a new high level which started rising noticeably by May 2021 and jumped from October 2021. June 2025 deaths are the highest June deaths on record.
Population loss is accelerated by births which are falling off the chart, with the drop increasing monthly. January 2025 births were 1.2% below January 2024 births (14.7% below 2019 levels); by June 2025 births had dropped to 12.8% below 2024 levels (26% below 2019 levels). The first notable deflection in births came in April 2022, 16 months after the start of Covid-19 vaccine rollouts. While births continued to drop over time, 2025 represents a new and highly abnormal decline in briths.
Meanwhile, the Singapore government seems to have quietly changed their recommendations for Covid-19 vaccines to include persons aged 60 and above, residents of aged care facilities, and medically vulnerable persons aged 6 months and above. Wouldn’t a medically vulnerable person be more at risk of vaccine harm? However, persons 6 months and older who wish to receive a vaccine are still able to. The recommendation for vaccination of pregnant women (as a specific recommendation) has been removed.
Is this quiet change in recommendations a reflection that the Government is aware of the failings of its covid-19 vaccination policies? They must be sweating bullets in their hallowed halls of government as they contemplate their collapsing population.

The Singaporean government does its population a grave disservice if it fails to officially recognize that the Covid-19 vaccination program it imposed on its population since the end of 2020 has had dire consequences. There is already abundant literature referring to fertility / fecundity and mortality impacts of the Covid-19 vaccines, which is increasing daily. Deaths will remain elevated while births will continue to decline!

Population-wide Covid-19 Vaccination is a extinction level event!

What next, Singapore?

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by Higgenbotham » Mon Aug 11, 2025 11:11 am

CDC shooter blamed COVID vaccine for depression; union demands statement against misinformation

By SUSAN HAIGH
Updated 11:29 AM CDT, August 10, 2025

A Georgia man who had blamed the COVID-19 vaccine for making him depressed and suicidal has been identified as the shooter who opened fire late Friday on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention headquarters, killing a police officer.

The 30-year-old suspect, who died during the incident, had also tried to get into the CDC’s headquarters in Atlanta but was stopped by guards before driving to a pharmacy across the street and opening fire, a law enforcement official told The Associated Press on Saturday.

The man, identified as Patrick Joseph White, was armed with five guns, including at least one long gun, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the investigation.

A union representing workers at the CDC said the incident was not random and “compounds months of mistreatment, neglect, and vilification that CDC staff have endured.” It demanded federal officials condemn vaccine misinformation, saying it was putting scientists at risk.
A neighbor of White told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that White “seemed like a good guy” but spoke with her multiple times about his distrust of COVID-19 vaccines in unrelated conversations.

“He was very unsettled, and he very deeply believed that vaccines hurt him and were hurting other people,” Nancy Hoalst, told the Atlanta newspaper. “He emphatically believed that.”

But Hoalst said she never believed White would be violent: “I had no idea he thought he would take it out on the CDC.”
https://apnews.com/article/cdc-suspect- ... 9f9f3568ba


Did the CDC acknowledge that Patrick Joseph White was suffering?
AI Mode

Did the CDC acknowledge that Patrick Joseph White was suffering?

Information indicates that Patrick Joseph White, who was identified as the shooter in the CDC headquarters shooting, had been reported by his father as being suicidal and fixated on the idea that the COVID-19 vaccine made him depressed. A neighbor also described him as "unsettled" and that he "very deeply believed that vaccines hurt him and were hurting other people".

The CDC acknowledged that Mr. White was "very disturbed" and had sought mental health assistance in the weeks before the shooting, according to a recording of an all-hands call reviewed by The Times. However, officials stated that there were no prior threats made to the CDC that could have foreseen the attack.
Short answer: No, they did not.

Calling somebody "very disturbed" is the typical response that The 97th Percentile defaults to. It's called the Centers for Disease Control. If it wasn't the COVID shot that caused his disease, then the Centers for Disease Control ought to be able to tell us what did cause his disease. If they can't know what causes disease so that they can control disease, which obviously they can't, they should be shut down.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Mon Aug 11, 2025 10:49 am

https://drkalcker.substack.com/p/autism ... al-is-real
Autism reversal is real

Autism can be reversed. It is a fact, not fiction...but it is suppressed.
A Personal Discovery and Breakthrough

In 2011, my nephew’s diagnosis of severe, nonverbal autism introduced me to this condition. His mother attributed his gluten intolerance to celiac disease, but my investigation revealed otherwise. Examining a fresh stool sample under a microscope, I identified numerous parasites, prompting me to recommend enemas with Miracle Mineral Solution (MMS), as Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) was unavailable at the time. Within weeks, my nephew—previously nonverbal, aggressive, self-injurious, exhibiting ataxia, flapping, and sleep difficulties—demonstrated rapid improvement. His Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) score, initially exceeding 80 (indicating severe autism), dropped significantly.

This success led me to develop Protocol P, detailed in my book Forbidden Health. Jim Humble, an MMS advocate, connected me with Kerri Rivera, who operated an autism clinic in Mexico. Rivera adopted Protocol P, later incorporating additional variables, and achieved remarkable outcomes. Through global conferences, I shared how Protocol P and chlorine dioxide facilitated hundreds of children achieving full recovery, with ATEC scores below 10, indicating no autism symptoms. These were severe, nonverbal cases, not high-functioning autism or Asperger’s, challenging the notion that autism is untreatable.

Top