Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by aedens » Mon Sep 01, 2025 9:36 pm

Good luck with a desensitized public contributing to increased radicalization. Just fools labeled pols.
From Godwins Law to SSRI Child Killers. Erev is known as Hamas from actual documentation from 835 BC.
The current batch of useful idiots as open border has not relented in our case since 1977.
The last few months is a outlier as the remnant of actual Democrats who fathom the Constitutional Republic
deal with security facets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFCGOCalqkE

As we discussed the period highs and lows FDR was a complusive luntatic infected with operatives as
known and debriefed from crytology files well known now. They ran cover only.

The dumb Americans will fall for it as they later offered. I was told one hand cannot save the corpse today at our
meeting. Meaning we witness events they always ignored. Israel was replanted exactly to the day as it was written
as events unfold. Anderson as we read way back was only three days off. Given the recheck we went back 3120 BC
lunar to back check His findings. Not a big deal and it will be simply missed.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by Higgenbotham » Mon Sep 01, 2025 5:30 pm

Higgenbotham wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:21 pm But the way I see it is the Indians are the Jews of the new dark age. They will play an appropriate role as we collapse versus the Jews played an appropriate role pre-collapse.
The Jews are so yesterday, so pre dark age.
EXCLUSIVE: Trump Acknowledges Israel Is Losing Control Of Congress
TRUMP: But when, if you go back 20 years. I mean, I will tell you, Israel had the strongest lobby in Congress of anything or body, or of any company or corporation or state that I’ve ever seen. Israel was the strongest. Today, it doesn’t have that strong a lobby. It’s amazing.

There was a time where you couldn’t speak bad, if you wanted to be a politician, you couldn’t speak badly. But today, you have, you know, AOC plus three, and you have all these lunatics, and they’ve really, they’ve changed it. You’re too young to know this, but if you go back 15 years, probably that’s when it started, right. Israel, you would understand this very much, Israel was the strongest lobby I’ve ever seen. They had total control over Congress, and now they don’t, you know, I’m a little surprised to see that.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/01/dona ... ess-lobby/

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by aedens » Sat Aug 30, 2025 12:40 pm

The ‘fairness agreement’ will end them in real time.
Simply runs cover to conclude the wasting as another class is financially deleted.
The correlation was 100 percent to the current model already posted.
First erase all knowledge to control the less than.
The algo will and has erased logical conclusions.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by Higgenbotham » Fri Aug 29, 2025 2:39 pm

Is a dark age defined as an extended period of significantly reduced integration, organisation and cohesion?

AI Overview

Yes, your description is accurate for how a "Dark Age" is generally characterized, though historians today use the term more cautiously or prefer more specific names like the "Early Middle Ages". It describes a period of societal decline characterized by a significant reduction in central power and the resulting fragmentation.
Is a dark age defined as the social and political breakdown of a regional or world hegemonic power which creates a power vacuum for which there is no clear and immediate successor?

AI Overview

A dark age is not formally defined by the collapse of a hegemonic power, and modern historians often reject the term entirely. The conventional understanding is that a "dark age" is a period with a scarcity of written historical records, making it seem "dark" or unknown to scholars.

However, the specific scenario you described—a power vacuum caused by the collapse of a hegemonic power—is a key characteristic of the historical periods most commonly labeled as "dark ages," such as the Early Middle Ages in Europe.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by Higgenbotham » Fri Aug 29, 2025 12:57 pm

Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 12:00 pm Not much new here. Thought I'd just summarize one of the basics that's been mentioned before.

Societal Collapse: What's Past Is Prologue | Luke Kemp
When a state begins to fail today, we
29:43
can very easily send resources, aid, peacekeepers, etc. to prop it back up.
29:49
And when you look at the best studies on state failure, they suggest that most states don't fail for anything longer
29:55
than roughly 6 months. Within that period, you usually have some kind of new rough and ready government which can
30:01
at least kind of try to impose rules, develop legislation, take taxes and extract resources and have something
30:08
like a monopoly on violence.
https://youtu.be/7aFS0smroeg?t=1796
tim wrote: Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:16 am
Austria by the end of 1922
was in the hands of the receivers, having regained a stable currency only
under the absolute direction of a foreigner. Hungary, too, had passed any
chance of self-redemption, and later on was to undergo an equal degree of
hardship and suffering, especially for her public servants. Stability returned
to Germany under a military dictatorship when much of the constitution had
been suspended - although the State of Emergency was only indirectly
necessitated by the destruction of the nation’s finances. To all three countries
stability and then recovery came. All had to be bailed out by others.
Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:47 am
vincecate wrote:
Higgenbotham wrote:A dark age is an extended period of significantly reduced integration, organisation and cohesion. (From an individual’s perspective, social bonds may become more intense in a dark age. However, overall cohesion is reduced because the social network extends much less far.
Does the fall of the USSR fit this definition?
By my definition no because the US and Western Europe. as the dominant hegemonic powers were able to lift the former USSR up and get it back on its feet. The dark age will occur when the West declines and collapses similarly to the USSR and there is no greater power to lift it back up.
The definition of a dark age that Vince quoted is Marc Widdowson's definition. My definition is: A dark age is defined as the social and political breakdown of a regional or world hegemonic power which creates a power vacuum for which there is no clear and immediate successor.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by aedens » Thu Aug 28, 2025 6:18 pm

Name actually is Karen protesting a LNG pipeline and don't you heat your house with LNG?
She 'No, we use natural gas'.
Nothing will stop the collapse already underway.
Take a good hard look who is pushing for the "multiculturism".
Collapse is well underway. The middle class is done here.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by Higgenbotham » Thu Aug 28, 2025 12:00 pm

Not much new here. Thought I'd just summarize one of the basics that's been mentioned before.

Societal Collapse: What's Past Is Prologue | Luke Kemp
The modern world in so far as our interconnectedness, our complexity is in
29:38
many ways a buffer against small shocks. When a state begins to fail today, we
29:43
can very easily send resources, aid, peacekeepers, etc. to prop it back up.
29:49
And when you look at the best studies on state failure, they suggest that most states don't fail for anything longer
29:55
than roughly 6 months. Within that period, you usually have some kind of new rough and ready government which can
30:01
at least kind of try to impose rules, develop legislation, take taxes and extract resources and have something
30:08
like a monopoly on violence. And that's a good thing obviously in
30:13
many regards. But the problem of having this big interconnected complex system is that once the shock is big enough or
30:19
it hits the right location, suddenly it it's amplified throughout the entire system. And a good example of this of
30:26
course is the global financial crisis in 2008 where a housing bubble in the US
30:32
suddenly becomes a financial crisis on a global scale. Similarly, Covid 19 what
30:38
previous would have been potentially more of a local or regional pandemic that would have spread at the speed of a
30:43
horse became a global pandemic in the space of months if not weeks. We see the
30:50
same thing with things like ransomware attacks. They can travel at the speed of an internet connection. In short, our
30:57
interconnected complex globalized systems are fantastic in some ways, but when they become too interdependent,
31:02
they become transmitters and amplifiers of different shocks and risks. And that means that collapse
31:10
going to the future is probably more likely to be global rather than local or regional. And it's probably likely be
31:16
much worse than it was in the past.
https://youtu.be/7aFS0smroeg?t=1796

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by tim » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:16 am

Money is no more than a medium of exchange. Only when it has a value
acknowledged by more than one person can it be so used. The more general
the acknowledgement, the more useful it is. Once no one acknowledged it,
the Germans learnt, their paper money had no value or use - save for papering
walls or making darts. The discovery which shattered their society was that
the traditional repository of purchasing power had disappeared, and that there
was no means left of measuring the worth of anything. For many, life became
an obsessional search for Sachverte, things of ‘real’, constant value: Stinnes
bought his factories, mines, newspapers. The meanest railway worker bought
gewgaws. For most, degree of necessity became the sole criterion of value,
the basis of everything from barter to behaviour. Man’s values became
animal values. Contrary to any philosophic assumption, it was not a salutary
experience.

What is precious is that which sustains life. When life is secure, society
acknowledges the value of luxuries, those objects, materials, services or
enjoyments, civilised or merely extravagant, without which life can proceed
perfectly well but which make it much pleasanter notwithstanding. When life
is insecure, or conditions are harsh, values change. Without warmth, without
a roof, without adequate clothes, it may be difficult to sustain life for more
than a few weeks. Without food, life can be shorter still. At the top of the
scale, the most valuable commodities are perhaps water and, most precious of
all, air, in whose absence life will last only a matter of minutes. For the
destitute in Germany and Austria whose money had no exchange value left
existence came very near these metaphysical conceptions. It had been so in
the war. In All Quiet on the Western Front, Müller died ‘and bequeathed me
his boots - the same that he once inherited from Kemmerick. I wear them, for
they fit me quite well. After me Tjaden will get them: I have promised them
to him.’

In war, boots; in flight, a place in a boat or a seat on a lorry may be the
most vital thing in the world, more desirable than untold millions. In
hyperinflation, a kilo of potatoes was worth, to some, more than the family
silver; a side of pork more than the grand piano. A prostitute in the family
was better than an infant corpse; theft was preferable to starvation; warmth
was finer than honour, clothing more essential than democracy, food more
needed than freedom.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by tim » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:16 am

Much as it may have been recognised that stability would have to be
arranged some day, and that the greater the delay the harder it would be, there
never seemed to be a good time to invite trouble of that order. Day by day
through 1920, 1921 and 1922 the reckoning was postponed, the more (not the
less) readily as the prospective consequences of inflation became more
frightening. The conflicting objectives of avoiding unemployment and
avoiding insolvency ceased at last to conflict when Germany had both.
The longer the delay, the more savage the cure. Austria by the end of 1922
was in the hands of the receivers, having regained a stable currency only
under the absolute direction of a foreigner. Hungary, too, had passed any
chance of self-redemption, and later on was to undergo an equal degree of
hardship and suffering, especially for her public servants. Stability returned
to Germany under a military dictatorship when much of the constitution had
been suspended - although the State of Emergency was only indirectly
necessitated by the destruction of the nation’s finances. To all three countries
stability and then recovery came. All had to be bailed out by others. Each was
obliged to accept a greater degree of economic disruption and unemployment
than need ever have been feared at the time when the excessive printing of
banknotes might still have been stopped. In all three cases, after inflation
reached a certain advanced stage, financial and economic disaster seems to
have been a prerequisite of recovery.
What really broke Germany was the constant taking of the soft political
option in respect of money. The take-off point therefore was not a financial
but a moral one; and the political excuse was despicable, for no imaginable
political circumstances could have been more unsuited to the imposition of a
new financial order than those pertaining in November 1923, when inflation
was no longer an option. The Rentenmark was itself hardly more than an
expedient then, and could scarcely have been introduced successfully had not
the mark lost its entire meaning. Stability came only when the abyss had been
plumbed, when the credible mark could fall no more, when everything that
four years of financial cowardice, wrong-headedness and mismanagement
had been fashioned to avoid had in fact taken place, when the inconceivable
had ineluctably arrived.

Re: Higgenbotham's Dark Age Hovel

by tim » Tue Aug 26, 2025 11:15 am

When war came back, so did inflation. With inflation alone, noted Günter
Schmölders,55 can a government extinguish debt without repayment, or wage
war and engage in other non-productive activities on a large scale: it is still
not recognised as a tax by the tax-payer. Thus did Hitler resume deficit
spending to finance armaments in 1938, and the experience begin again. As
in the first case, the second inflation was a ten-year affair, although huge
price inflation did not start in earnest until the eighth and ninth years, when
cigarettes took over as the medium of exchange.

In terms of public perception, however, the second inflation travelled much
faster. By 1948 the Reichsmark was abandoned, and ten Reichsmarks were
traded in in cash against the new Deutschmark, while bank accounts were
credited with only 6.50 Deutschmarks for every 100 Reichsmarks. Disaster
had struck the holders of money values once again, but the agony was
contained very much more quickly. The pass to which the Reichsmark had
come in 1947-1948, the loss of nine-tenths of its value, had been achieved by
its predecessor, the mark, as early as 1919.

Her new war indemnities apart, Germany was once again an almost debtfree
country; and once again, with stability regained, great foreign loans were
available to haul her out of her economic difficulties. Once again the
repudiation of debt, conscious or unconscious, had been shown to be no more
than a stage on the hyper-inflationary road. In the Toronto Star Weekly in
December 1923, Ernest Hemingway described a street auction of inflation
banknotes - German marks, Austrian kronen, Russian roubles - which the
citizens of Toronto were being urged to buy in the hope, of which Germans,
Austrians and Russians had long since been brutally robbed, that when sanity
returned the banknotes, too, would retrieve their old values:

No one explained to the listening men that the cheap-looking Russian money
had been printed in million-rouble denominations as fast as the presses could
work in order to wipe out the value of the old imperial money and in
consequence the money-holding class. Now the Soviet has issued roubles
backed by gold.
How great does inflation have to be before a government can no longer
control it? Most economists accept that mild inflation has certain therapeutic
advantages for a nation which must deal with the social and economic
problems to which industrial democracies are usually subject. Most
electorates still accept the statements of their politicians’ pious intentions in
regard to controlling ever rising prices: and yet the Deutschmark, the
currency of the country which had most reason to fear inflation, lost twothirds
of its purchasing power between 1948 and 1975. The pound lost almost
half its purchasing power between 1970 and 1975. In neither instance,
however, did such depreciation represent a deliberate, cynical policy; which,
no doubt, would also have been claimed by the German bankers and
governments of the early 1920s, who looked for causes of their monetary
difficulties beyond their own printing press and tax system - and found them,
without difficulty and to their complete intellectual satisfaction. It remains so
that once an inflation is well under way (as Schmölders has it) ‘it develops a
powerful lobby that has no interest in rational arguments’. This was as true
for Austria and Hungary as for Germany.

Top