Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

BREAKING: FDA Approves New Covid Vaccines

Actually, they sort of destroyed the whole program. I just stole that headline—verbatim—from USA Today.

The truth is, what actually happened is almost the exact opposite. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s FDA just revoked the Covid shots’ Emergency Use Authorization—the very magic wand that greenlit mandates, job losses, military purges, school expulsions, and the whole dystopian circus of the last four years. Finally, mercifully, the golden ticket for coercion has been run through the shredder.

Instead of sweeping recommendations that essentially include anyone with a pulse, now you must be over 65 or have at least one health condition to qualify for endless jabs. In other words, if you’re not frail or high-risk, the government is officially done forcing you to take one for the team.

I know. They’re still allowing poisonous cocktails to be given to the most fragile groups on earth. Tell me you’re keen on depopulating the planet without telling me you’re keen on depopulating the planet. But at least someone is trying to protect some of us.

Naturally, mainstream media rushed to spin this as great news for vaxaholics. “FDA APPROVES UPDATED COVID-19 SHOTS,” PBS bellowed, followed by a sheepish whisper in microscopic type: “…with some restrictions for kids and adults.” The same outlets that once hawked the jab as a granny-saving miracle are now straining to slap a smiley-face sticker on what is, in reality, a massive retreat.

“Parents will still be able to seek out shots from rival drugmaker Moderna, the other maker of mRNA vaccines, which has full FDA approval for children as young as 6 months,” PBS attempted to soothe, after having to break the tragic news to its readers that Pfizer’s vaccine will no longer be available for any child under five. “But the company’s Spikevax vaccine is only approved for children with at least one serious health problem.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics—who just two weeks ago issued their own vaccine guidance (in summary: every arm, every season, quit questioning) that differs from federal policy—moaned that the new limits “may block vaccine access for families who want to protect their children.” Imagine the horror: parents panicking because their healthy toddlers won’t be injected with an experimental gene therapy.

An epidemiologist at Brown even lamented that the changes might “make it harder for people to get vaccines.” Harder? It means you now have to talk to your doctor before you roll up your sleeve. Oh, the humanity.

Pfizer and Moderna, of course, rushed out press releases reminding us that yes, the juice is still flowing if grandma wants her Spikevax fix—because nothing says “science” like a quarterly earnings call.

Weaponizing "Misinformation" to Bury Safety Concerns: A Response on RSV Monoclonal Antibodies
Yaffa Shir-Raz

The recent critique raises a number of claims regarding my article. This response addresses the substantive points directly, focusing solely on the evidence.

When evaluating new interventions for healthy newborns, presenting the full safety record – including every death – is not optional, it is a fundamental obligation. This is always true, but in the case of Merck’s clesrovimab it was especially critical: the FDA skipped presenting the product to its advisory committee on the grounds that it was "not first in class." This left ACIP as the only public forum charged with reviewing the product. Instead of two independent layers of oversight, there was only one. In such circumstances, withholding or downplaying deaths meant that ACIP – the sole safeguard – was not given the complete picture it needed to protect infants and families.

Before turning to the substantive issues, two clarifications are in order:

A large portion of the critique is devoted to personal ad hominem remarks. Such rhetoric does not honor the principles of scientific debate and is contrary to what science should represent. I will therefore not address these attacks further.

Some of the first claims in the critique actually concern an article by Dr. Maryanne Demasi, which I cited. Since I included them, I will clarify them briefly:

"The CDC split the age groups (0-37 days vs. 38 days-8 months) for sound epidemiological reasons, not to conceal a signal."
My article highlighted that the split erased statistical significance. A unified calculation shows a nearly four-fold increase in seizure risk, a signal that was never presented to ACIP. The split was not explained during the meeting, and it occurred exactly at the point when routine vaccinations begin. Even if additional vaccines are a confounder, that does not absolve the CDC of its obligation to present the combined analysis. An advisory committee deserves to see both the stratified and the pooled results.

"Pooling the two age groups is not epidemiologically valid."
I wrote explicitly that the problem lies in presenting only a single stratified analysis that removed the signal. Good pharmacovigilance practice requires sensitivity analyses, including pooled windows and alternative models. A pooled analysis is standard in post-marketing surveillance, and the CDC should have shown it as well.

Beyond the factual dispute, this argument demonstrates a methodological fallacy: it invokes epidemiological rigor selectively. The critic dismisses pooled safety analysis as "inappropriate" while ignoring that pooling is exactly the standard practice for rare adverse events. This selective deployment of rigor is itself unscientific. The same inconsistency appears in the treatment of confidence intervals: wide intervals do not make results meaningless; they mean large risks cannot be ruled out, which is precisely why transparency is required.

Higgenbotham wrote: Mon Aug 25, 2025 7:22 pm

Newsweek

RFK Jr. may roll back major achievement Donald Trump called "monumental"
Story by Nick Mordowanec

President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are allegedly planning to ban the COVID vaccine "within months," years after Trump labeled the vaccine's development during the pandemic as a "monumental achievement," according to an associate of Kennedy's.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/ ... 32f2&ei=10

Newsweek

RFK Jr. may roll back major achievement Donald Trump called "monumental"
Story by Nick Mordowanec

President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are allegedly planning to ban the COVID vaccine "within months," years after Trump labeled the vaccine's development during the pandemic as a "monumental achievement," according to an associate of Kennedy's.

Revamped CDC Panel Taps Covid Vaccine Critic to Lead Task Force
Story by Jessica Nix

(Bloomberg) -- An influential vaccine panel’s task force will be led by a member who has previously expressed distrust in the Covid vaccine, weeks after a shooting on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was fueled by Covid misinformation.

Retsef Levi, an operations professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, will lead the Covid-19 immunization task force, a spokesperson for Health and Human Services confirmed without offering additional comment. Levi has previously said the Covid shots should be removed from the market and has called the safety of mRNA shots into question.

“The evidence is mounting and indisputable that MRNA vaccines cause serious harm including death, especially among young people. We have to stop giving them immediately!” Levi posted on X in January 2023.

Levi was appointed to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, in June during an overhaul of the panel. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all 17 members, citing high levels of conflicts of interest, and replaced them with seven members, many of which are vaccine critics.

Yale’s Censored Vaccine Injury Research and the Urgent Need for Scientific Reform

Unveiling Jay's Bhattacharya's extraordinary initiative to rebuild American Science

Story at a Glance:

•One premier research group has bravely studied the vaccine-injured and provided many critical details about their multi-year illnesses.

•Unfortunately, despite their excellent research, medical journals have refused to publish their results, including the most recent study which showed clear differences exist between long COVID and COVID-19 vaccine injuries.

•Science is ultimately predicated upon the methods we use discern what is actually true (epistemology). As this subject has been neglected, our epistemological standards frequently result in existing dogmas and vested interests being reaffirmed while critically important data never reaches the public awareness (e.g., due to widespread medical journal censorship).

•During COVID-19, the severe abuses of the scientific community (which ultimately resulted from it having no accountability for failing to uphold its social responsibilities) broke the public trust in science, and allowed something previously inconceivable—MAHA to gain control of our corrupt scientific apparatus and have a mandate to reform it.

•NIH director Jay Bhattacharya has announced his commitment to fixing the scientific apparatus and has engaged in a variety of NIH initiatives and public discussions which are vital to allowing science to serve the people rather than vested-interests.

Flu Shot Revolt: Troops Say They’re Being Crushed for Refusing ‘Unlawful Orders’

“President Trump and Defense Secretary Hegseth are giving the illusion that they are trying to make it right—but soldiers say their careers are being destroyed.”

INSANITY: American Academy of Pediatrics Demands All Infants Be Vaccinated for COVID— Even Against Parents’ Will!

Pediatricians push mRNA jabs for babies as young as 6 months, fueling outrage over parental rights and Big Pharma influence.

BREAKING: Russian Researchers Tie mRNA Rollout to Alarming Rise in Cancer Cases

Groundbreaking Russian research links mass vaccination to unexpected surge in cases and deaths.

Houston, We Have Another Problem: Unvaccinated Children Born of Past-Vaccination Mothers, Despite Never Contracting Covid...Are Dying Now at 77% Excess - a 24 Sigma Event

Before we get to the horrifying data that once again proves that these Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccines” are genetically modifying future generations, even if they are not directly injected with these EUA poisons, let us briefly review a grim statistic for those demographics that did get these democide shots:



As predicted by this Substack years ago, this disability trend, directly in line with VAIDS symptoms that are increasingly expressing themselves across all age groups, even ones that historically never came down with diseases such as (turbo) cancer, will only get worse.

And now let us review the gene altering implications of these murderous “vaccines” in the newly born and unborn alike…

So what did really happen to Tiffany Dover?

The story of the nurse who collapsed on live TV after being given one of the first Covid Pfizer shots

New Bill Gates-Funded Chimeric Polio Vaccine for Children Sheds 100% in Recipients, Spread Documented: 'The Lancet' Journal

Frankenstein pathogen cobbled from multiple viruses gained genetic stability, meaning scientists rewired its genome with an unnatural trait no wild poliovirus has.

The American "Academy" of Pediatrics has published its own recommendations for a childhood vax schedule.

Doctors who follow it will be surprised to learn they may not be shielded from liability, and parents may get hefty bills in the mail.

The death cult continues hunting pregnant women and newborns. Moderna's CMV vaccine will be approved soon.


The strategy of eugenics and population control by “public health”, aka, poisoning by “vaccines” is not new, and mothers and children have always been its target. The “death care” drive to poison babies before they are born or on the first day of their life at the latest continues unabated, and yes, it is a critical agenda item that spans every administration, regardless of political party in charge. To recap just the most recent iterations, starting with Trump’s Operation Warp Speed:

Early 2020: OWS mRNA vaccine development contracts specifically mentioned 4 million pregnant women in the US as a target, ahem, “for protection”, obviously. This was months before any non-evidence that SARS-Cov2 poses risk to pregnancy was compiled by the poisoners at CDC. I covered this non-evidence here. SARS-Cov2 (whatever that was) never posed any special risk to pregnant women, but the CDC still insists that it does, and insists that ALL pregnant women be shot with mRNA, per current FDA and CDC MAHA policy.

The mRNA injections were never “officially” tested for safety in pregnancy. The strategy was to officially exclude pregnant women from clinical trials (which is the norm in drug development), but then “accidentally” get thousands of them injected anyway, collect the data and study the carnage, then lie about it to the public, coercing and manipulating pregnant women into injections at every turn. Examples of this include the infamous Shimabukuro et al study using fraudulent math. Applying the correct math showed 80%+ miscarriage rate and 300% increase in stillbirths in that dataset.

Note that JikkyLeaks, Arkmedic, Saidi, horse gambler OpenVAET + the assorted mouse crew (all of them have multiple online personas) try to misrepresent this finding and manipulate the public opinion away from it, by piling on other extraneous data. That’s bullshit. A published study is a dataset on its own, and it’s proper re-analysis is the way to demonstrate fraud on the public. Jikky crew are liars on behalf of the criminal cartel, don’t fall for their tactics.

As I published in my review of Moderna’s animal studies submitted to the FDA and FOIAed in 2022, reproductive toxicity study in pregnant rats showed extreme maternal toxicity and fetal malformations. Moderna admitted to statistically significant increase in fetal skeletal malformations:


The skeletal malformations were temporally associated to the days when highest toxicity was observed in the mothers: “Maternal toxicity in the form of clinical observations was observed for 5 days following the last dose (GD 13), correlating with the most sensitive period for rib development in rats (GDs 14 to 17)”.

The FDA included the following statement in the Basis for Regulatory Action Summary document (Section 4: Non-clinical Reproductive Toxicology, p.14):

“No vaccine-related fetal malformations or variations and no adverse effect on postnatal development were observed in the study. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the pre-fusion stabilized spike protein antigen following immunization were observed in maternal samples and F1 generation rats indicating transfer of antibodies from mother to fetus and from mother to nursing pups.”

I discussed this fact with RFK Jr on his podcast in 2022. The lie from the FDA is still there, they have not retracted it even though he is in charge of the agency now!

The CDC schedule today includes RSV shots for ALL pregnant women. Three vaxxes are approved for RSV, one of them - Moderna - is mRNA, discussed here. The others are just as poisonous. Robert Malone and Martin Kuldorff, new, MAHA co-chairs of ACIP just voted in the monoclonal antibody for RSV for ALL newborns whose mothers were not shot with RSV, which is “belt and suspenders” strategy, I guess. The RSV mAb for babies is an atrocity that killed more babies in clinical trials vs. whatever other poison was used as a “control”. Discussed in this post.

Let’s not forget that MAHA-FDA approved the new Moderna shot mNexspike based on no placebo controlled trials and no long term safety. This is discussed in this post. In the same post I discussed the soon-to-be-approved Arcturus self-amplifying RNA shot (without placebo controlled trial, naturally), and quoted report from Conspiracy Sarah on the $500M going to Jeffrey Taubenberger’s gold standard universal poison using BPL, and I separately discussed it here. All of these will be pushed on pregnant women per Makary-Prasad “new” mRNA policy.

You probably know this already - Prasad is back at the FDA as head of CBER, after a week of “spending more time with his family”. Does it mean he hates his family and wants to spend more time with the FDA?