Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

BREAKING STUDY: Pfizer mRNA Found in Over 88% of Human Placentas, Sperm, and Blood — and in 50% of Unvaccinated Pregnant Women
Human biodistribution study shows Pfizer mRNA penetrates fetal and reproductive tissues, persists long-term in the body, and presents clear evidence of shedding.

For years, the public was told a simple story: the mRNA “stays in the arm,” degrades within hours, never enters the bloodstream, never crosses the placenta, never reaches the reproductive system, and certainly cannot be shed or transferred to others. These claims were repeated endlessly by agencies, fact-checkers, news outlets, and medical institutions, despite the fact that no long-term human biodistribution studies had ever been performed.

A new peer-reviewed study published in Annals of Case Reports titled, Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen, ends that narrative.

Researchers from Bar-Ilan University and several Israeli medical centers used nested PCR combined with Sanger sequencing—a far more sensitive and specific method than the standard qPCR used in earlier studies—to test for Pfizer mRNA in human tissues from 34 participants, including 22 pregnant women, 4 male sperm donors (8 samples), and 8 additional adults.

Their findings are deeply worrisome: 88% of pregnant women vaccinated within the last 100 days showed detectable Pfizer mRNA in both blood and placental tissue. Among male sperm donors, 100% of those who produced sperm had vaccine mRNA in their sperm cells, and 50% had it detectable in seminal fluid—long after vaccination.

Even more concerning, Pfizer mRNA was detected in 50% of the unvaccinated women tested —two in both placenta and blood, and one in blood alone; a result that forces the scientific community to confront the reality of shedding, something officials categorically deny.

Most striking of all, mRNA was still present in 50% of individuals more than 200 days after injection.

This is the clearest evidence to date that the injection does not degrade “within hours”—but instead persists, circulates, and deposits into human reproductive and fetal tissues.

The implications are enormous.

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get A Hepatitis B Vaccine?

Tomorrow, we have a once in a lifetime chance to end this disastrous policy

Story at a Glance:

•The hepatitis B vaccine has been marred by controversy since its inception, particularly since it is now given to every newborn child despite less than one in a million children benefitting from this policy.

•Remarkably, much of that controversy (e.g., Congressional hearings, mainstream news programs, and HIV vaccine contamination concerns) has been largely forgotten.

•The hepatitis B vaccine has long been associated with autoimmune disorders, particularly demyelinating ones. While the medical community has insisted for over 50 years that this link remains unproven and requires “further research”, evidence demonstrates this process indeed occurs.

•While the hepatitis B vaccine has reduced acute cases in high-risk demographics (e.g., intravenous drug users), there is no evidence it has done the same in newborns (as applicable circumstances are incredibly rare) or reduced chronic hepatitis cases.

•Tomorrow, on Thursday, the blanket policy to give it to every newborn will at last be re-evaluated. It is critical we understand what is at stake and why we actually vaccinate every newborn so we can support this policy being changed.

Tenpenny Monday Minute

Lies, and more lies, about flu shots in the elderly.

It’s not okay for journals to omit data, but that is exactly what the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) just did.

NEJM never published the data showing that Pfizer’s mRNA flu shot failed in the over-65 age group.

The shot offers almost no clinical benefit in adults 18-64, but that is not all. NEJM failed to publish data from older adults, and these data were from the SAME trial.

The over-65 age group is the group that supposedly benefits the most from these vaccines. You could even say that this age group is the entire reason these vaccines exist.

Where’s the accountability?

Instead, researchers buried the data in ClinicalTrials.gov, more than likely to give them an “out” that they really did “publish” the data. The real reason was that the data were out of sight, out of mind, far from the scrutiny of a pesky journal.

Diligent researchers began digging into the data and were stunned by what they found.

The bottom line? A supposedly upstanding, flagship journal has selectively reported findings…the very findings that often directly shape public health decisions.

There’s no accountability, and certainly no integrity.

Prasad FDA Memo: Regulatory Implications

Yes, the investigation of VAERS childhood deaths is important. But Media is overlooking the big picture.

I spent my early Monday hours today doomscrolling through “X”, monitoring the outrage and consternation concerning FDA/CBER director Dr. Vinay Prasad’s “official” (actually unofficial “leaked”) acknowledgment that there have been COVID mRNA-induced vaccine deaths of children. Yes, I guess that is an important event, but I first became aware of these specific findings last summer in the context of my service at ACIP. So, it's pretty much yesterday’s news for me.

Because of how I first encountered the data and investigation findings, I am embargoed by FACA federal law from disclosing what I know of them. However, I can assure you that the findings of Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg (FDA Office of the Commissioner, ACIP FDA liaison) are much more shocking than just the number and age of the vaccine-related deaths.

In reviewing the social media posts and chatter, what seems to be almost completely overlooked are the Regulatory policy components of this “leaked” internal memo from Director Prasad to his bureaucracy. When I wrote my initial essay last Saturday posting the letter with a brief introduction (titled “A Revolution in Vaccine Regulation and Approval”), it was the public policy changes being announced that struck me as revolutionary. I have been alerting parents to the risks of harm to children from the genetic COVID vaccines for many years now. Not surprisingly, I experienced a wave of concerted attacks for this from corporate media, internet trolls/bots, and even the Israeli and Spanish governments! But I stand by every word, and have been vindicated and validated since (including by this recent memo from CBER Director Dr. Prasad). The fact that pediatric deaths have occurred post coerced and mandated inoculation with these products is not news to me.

BREAKING/URGENT: mRNA COVID VACCINES KILLED AT LEAST 10 KIDS, THE FDA REPORTS

An FDA review found the shots to blame for the deaths, FDA's new vaccine chief - Dr. Vinay Prasad - told staffers in an email. The agency will tighten standards on new vaccine approval, Prasad wrote.

BREAKING: Food and Drug Administration scientists have found Covid mRNA jabs killed at least 10 children, the FDA’s chief vaccine regulator told staffers Friday.

The real number of children and teenagers killed by mRNA vaccines is likely much higher, Dr. Vinay Prasad - wrote in a six-page note to staffers. After looking at 96 deaths of kids aged 7-16, FDA reviewers found 10 “died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination,” Prasad wrote.

The death toll of 10 depends on voluntary reporting and is almost certainly a significant underestimate, Prasad wrote. In addition, the FDA reviewers excluded cases where records were ambiguous.

The FDA’s age range was also narrow — and did not include older teens or young adults, like Simone Scott, a Northwestern University student who died of myocarditis-induced heart failure weeks after receiving the Moderna shot.1

Prasad acknowledged the possibility Covid shots killed more children than they saved.

“Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death,” he wrote.

Prasad did not disclose details of the mRNA-caused deaths, such as the exact age and sex of victims, which shots they had received, or the exact cause of death or timing after the shots.

He also did not disclose whether the FDA or Centers for Disease Control, which runs the federal vaccine safety database, had contacted parents to tell them their children’s deaths were Covid vaccine-caused.

BREAKING STUDY: COVID-19 “Vaccines” Linked to Multiple Sclerosis, Lupus, Type 1 Diabetes, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Graves’ Disease, and Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis

A scoping review of 109 studies finds 56% of papers suggest a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and six major autoimmune diseases.

Study Finds Nattokinase Dissolves 84% of Amyloid Microclots Within 2 Hours In Vitro

A natural enzyme potently degrades the same amyloid microclots recently found in 100% of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals tested.

Bombshell Rasmussen Survey Released

Millions Experienced COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

According to a bombshell Rasmussen survey, 36% of Americans who received the COVID-19 jab experienced side effects.

Additionally, nearly half of them believe the vaccines have caused the death of many patients.

Twenty-six percent of the people surveyed reported minor side effects, 10% reported significant side effects, and 60% of vaccinated adults reported no side effects.

According to Rasmussen, the U.S. adult population is now 258 million, which “would mean 63 million had at least some side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine, including more than 17 million who experienced major side effects.”

Forty-six percent of all American Adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 shots caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, down from 55% in September 2024 - including 25% who say it’s Very Likely.

Forty-four percent (44%) now don’t think a significant number of deaths have been caused by vaccine side effects, including 20% who believe it’s Not At All Likely. Another 12% are not sure.

Although polling has statistical errors and biases, the trend is clear: a significant minority of people believe that the Nobel Prize-winning modified RNA COVID-19 inoculation harmed them. And the discrepancy between what the public is reporting via side effects, including severe outcomes, and what the scientific literature and CDC reports are is stark. We must get to the reason why there is a massive disconnect between the public, who believe these shots have harmed them, and the scientific establishment.

Asian Population Collapse Summary. Deaths remains a step higher than Pre-pandemic levels with increases since 2018 ranging from 11.0% to 24.3%. Birth declines since 2018 range from 18.6% to 51.2%.

Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan Vital Statistics provide evidence of accelerating birth losses in 2025 and no recovery in deaths. Hong Kong and Taiwan have population loss.

Hong Kong. 2018 to 2025(p): 41% decline in births, 11% rise in deaths. Overt population decline since 2020 with losses accelerating.

Macau. 2018 - 2025(p): 51.9% decline in births, 17.7% rise in deaths. Nearing population decline.

Malaysia. 2018 - 2025(p): 25% decline in births, 11% rise in deaths. Population growth slowing.

Philippines. 2018 - 2024(p): 18.9% decline in births, 18.8% rise in deaths. Population growth slowing.

Singapore. 2018 - 2025(p): 23.2% decline in births, 24.3% rise in deaths. Population growth dropped by 80%, approaching population decline.

Taiwan. 2018 - 2025 (p): 40% decline in births, 16.7% rise in deaths. Decline in natural population growth since 2020, with losses accelerating.

Autism and Vaccines
QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS | PAGE 2 OF 9 | ALL PAGES
For Everyone
NOV. 19, 2025
KEY POINTS
The claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.
Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.
HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links.

BREAKING: CDC quietly rewrites its vaccine–autism guidance

In a stunning shift, the CDC now says its own “vaccines don’t cause autism” claim was not evidence-based.

For the first time in a generation, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has rewritten its official position on whether vaccines can cause autism.

This is a change that could reshape one of the most politically charged and emotionally fraught debates in modern medicine.

In a website update published on 19 November 2025, the agency now states that the long-standing claim “vaccines do not cause autism” is “not an evidence-based claim” because scientific studies “have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”

The page also acknowledges that “studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities.”

It’s difficult to overstate the significance of these statements. For nearly two decades, they would have been unthinkable for a federal public health agency.

The timing is equally striking.

The change arrives at a moment when the political and scientific landscape around vaccine safety is undergoing a marked shift inside the Trump–Kennedy administration.

For months, critics have accused Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and several of the administration’s appointees of holding unconventional views on vaccine safety.

The CDC’s revised language now places the agency closer to Kennedy’s long-standing argument that federal agencies had ignored crucial evidence.

The CDC explains the shift by pointing to the Data Quality Act, which requires federal communications to accurately reflect the evidence.

Because studies have not excluded the possibility that infant vaccines could contribute to autism, the agency concedes that its long-standing categorical statement was not scientifically justified.

The update states plainly that scientific uncertainty remains, particularly for vaccines administered in the first year of life.