Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:42 pm

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/haw ... vaccinated
Hawaii Measles Case in Vaccinated Person

State Department of Health confirms.
The MMR vaccine contains a live measles virus, according to the manufacturer.

The live measles virus in the MMR vaccine is the product of gain-of-function (GOF) laboratory experiments, meaning it is deliberately engineered to enhance its ability to infect more human cells than the wild-type measles virus is able to, and may retain characteristics that enable transmission and replication in the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.

The live virus in the vaccine can be shed for weeks from the vaccinated, potentially infecting the unvaccinated. A 1995 CDC study found that 83% of vaccinated children had measles virus shed in their urine. An April 2012 publication in the peer-reviewed journal Paediatrics & Child Health reported a child was being investigated after developing a new-onset measles-type rash after receiving a measles vaccine, meaning the shot can cause disease in the vaccinated. Nucleic acid testing confirmed that a “vaccine-type measles virus was being shed in the [child’s] urine.” A 2014 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases confirms that vaccinated individuals can transmit measles to multiple contacts.

There are no peer-reviewed studies that confirm the virus in the measles vaccine is less infectious or replicates less in humans than the wild-type virus found in nature, meaning health officials have no scientific basis for claiming the vaccine strain poses a lower transmission risk to the unvaccinated.

The claim that many of these measles cases are from wild-type measles viruses and not the live virus in the vaccine is undermined by the fact that the PCR test used as evidence of wild-type infection is only reliable less than 3% of the time. Research in Access Microbiology highlights that standard PCR assays might not effectively distinguish between vaccine and wild-type strains. The CDC has confirmed that PCR tests often misinterpret measles vaccine virus infection as wild-type measles infection: “Inability of these testing panels to differentiate between measles virus causing illness and incidental detection of measles vaccine virus RNA can have significant public health reporting and response ramifications, potentially leading to misdiagnosis of measles virus infection,” writes CDC. BLAST analysis shows that the CDC’s measles RT-PCR forward primer, reverse primer, and fluorescent probe all have numerous perfect or near-perfect contiguous matches to the human genome (15–20 bases, up to 100% identity), meaning the assay can generate a positive PCR signal based on human genetic material rather than the measles virus itself.

95% of infants develop fever after measles vaccination, 16% develop more serious measles-like symptoms; and in 70% of vaccinated children with measles-like illness, health officials can not tell if the vaccine pathogen or a wild measles virus caused the illness, according (here) to the journal BMC Infectious Diseases.

CDC data show that 95% of U.S. measles cases are “unvaccinated or unknown,” but because the agency merges confirmed unvaccinated individuals with cases where vaccination status is simply unknown, the dataset obscures how many infections actually occurred in vaccinated versus unvaccinated people.

Measles outbreaks have followed government-led vaccination campaigns in Texas, Canada, and Hawaii, raising concerns of vaccine-caused infections.

Texas administered 15,000 more measles vaccinations in 2025 compared to 2024. The state subsequently suffered a growing measles outbreak that surpassed the total number of cases reported across the entire United States the previous year.

A 12-month-old girl in Michigan who was infected with measles had received an MMR vaccine.

Southern New Mexico’s most populous and vaccinated county, Doña Ana, reported its first measles infection after the state nearly doubled its measles vaccination rate compared to 2024.

Virginia’s first confirmed measles case in 2025 occurred in a child following state and local health officials issuing multiple public health announcements urging residents to get the MMR shot.

Just weeks after the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) rolled out a “measles simulator dashboard” meant to pressure students and residents into receiving MMR vaccines, Illinois reported its first confirmed measles case of 2025.

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment recently confirmed a fifth case of measles in Colorado in 2025 in a Denver County adult resident with verified measles (MMR) vaccination records.

In May 2025, Texas and New Mexico had the sharpest increase in measles vaccination—they also had the most measles cases.

The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reported a confirmed case of measles in central Iowa in an adult following a state-led MMR vaccination campaign, raising questions as to whether the efforts to boost vaccination rates led to the infection.

Dallas’ first measles case was found in a “fully vaccinated” woman.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:40 pm

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.co ... iochemical
DECLASSIFIED CIA REPORT: BIOCHEMICAL RESEMBLANCE BETWEEN ENDOPARASITES AND MALIGNANT TUMORS
In 2011 the CIA nonchalantly declassified their “sanitized copy approved for release” report on 1940s Soviet research establishing that cancers and parasites, “resemble each other in many respects by reason of similar conditions under which they grow and exist. This suggested long ago the idea in regard to the parasitic nature of tumors.”

For many years now this Substack has been exposing that cancer is akin to parasitic disease, concurrent with some form of metabolic dysfunction, not limited to VAIDS-induced cancers, and that the most effective way to cure all cancers involves a multi-pronged approach of repurposed antiparasitic compounds and diet; for example:
What is particularly fascinating is that Soviet researchers were positing over three quarters of a century ago that antiparasitic compounds like atebrin would cure cancer.

They were also already aware of the metabolic shift in tumor cells to meet increased requirements for DNA and RNA synthesis, energy production (via ATP and GTP), and signaling (via cAMP and cGMP); in other words, they were describing a kind of cancer mutation that allowed these deadly cells to adapt the “Warburg effect;” thus, allowing the cancer cells to feed on glucose, versus healthy cells which require oxygen.

Basically, the Soviets (and Americans) were well aware of these properties of cancer, and more than likely could have cured all cancers long ago if they so wanted to.

Of course, BigPharma and their Intelligence-Industrial Complex handlers had other plans, and by the 1960s they were only interested in foisting cancer-causing vaccines, carcinogenic chemicals, GMO, and other poisons on humanity, rather than actually curing cancer.

Even way back in 1896 Dr. Charles F. Craig wrote a brief scientific paper titled, THE PARASITIC ORIGIN OF CARCINOMA, where he postulated:

It is the purpose of this paper to briefly review the most important investigations upon the parasitic origin of this disease…

…these [parasitic] bodies are present in fresh cancer cells, so that they cannot be produced by changes occurring in the cells during the process of hardening. Plimmer found them present in every case of cancer which he examined (four hundred consecutive cases) and never found them in any other variety of tumor.

It is especially ironic that Dr. Craig’s historic research is currently being hosted on the NIH website.

Even BigPharma-owned sites like Cancer Research Institute (CRI) were publishing in 2014 articles titled, Do Bacteria Cause Cancer?, admitting that cancer is caused by parasites and bacteria that in turn induce chronic inflammation:

William Coley, MD, the 19th century New York surgeon known as the “Father of Cancer Immunology,” had an interesting theory about what causes cancer: he thought cancer was caused by a microbe. Some tiny organism originating outside the body had invaded and caused the cancer—much like bacteria invading the lungs cause tuberculosis (TB). This “parasitic theory of cancer” became popular at the end of the 19th century, when many common diseases such as tuberculosis, cholera, anthrax, and smallpox were shown to be caused by identifiable “germs.” Cancer too, many believed, was likely microbial in origin.

“The evidence in favor of the microparasitic origin of cancer has been steadily and rapidly accumulating until at the present moment it rests little short of absolute demonstration,” Coley wrote confidently in 1893.

The parasitic origin of cancer had many things going for it. For one, it helped to make sense of Coley’s clinical experience with bacterial toxins (“Coley’s toxins”) as a treatment for cancer. If bacterial toxins were able to kill cancer, that must be because cancer itself was caused by a microbe.

[…[

So strong was the opposition to the parasitic theory that even when The Rockefeller Institute biologist Peyton Rous, in 1911, provided clear evidence that a microscopic parasite—a virus—was able to cause cancer in farm animals, no one believed him. It was not until 1966 that Rous’s discovery of chicken sarcoma virus was vindicated, by a Nobel Prize, when Rous was 86 years old.

[…]

Today, scientists realize that Virchow was largely correct. Chronic inflammation, triggered by bacteria, can lead to the production of DNA-damaging molecules that cause mutations; this, combined with signals to produce new cells and grow new blood vessels—hallmarks of wound healing—can create a fertile ground for the emergence and growth of cancer.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:25 pm

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ddenly-0f4
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, March 2-9, 2026

Actors Jennifer Corman (C), Corey Parker (C, Will & Grace), Stephen Hibbert, Annabel Schofield (C), Maria O’Brien; TV producers Bob Rosenfarb; blues singer John Hammond; rocker Tommy DeCarlo; & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:24 pm

This book was published in 1988 and foreshadows much of whats coming out today.

https://archive.org/stream/murder-by-in ... s_djvu.txt
MURDER BY INJECTION

The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America

By EUSTACE MULLINS

1988
Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee,
of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, "My honest opinion is that
vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I
could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold
sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of
vaccination.
From London comes an alarming observation from a
practitioner of excellent reputation and long experience. Dr. Herbert
Snow, senior surgeon at the Cancer Hospital of London, voiced his
concern, "In recent years many men and women in the prime of life
have dropped dead suddenly, often after attending a feast or a
banquet. I am convinced that some eighty per cent of these deaths
are caused by the inoculation or vaccination they have undergone.
They are well known to cause grave and permanent disease to the
heart. The coroner always hushes it up as 'natural causes.' "
Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana, finds that
"Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with
cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a
least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer
in an unvaccinated person."

At last, we have the breakthrough for which the American
Cancer Society has been searching, at such great expense, and for so
many years. Dr. Clarke has never seen a case of cancer in an
unvaccinated person. Is not this a lead which should be explored?
With such an impetus, the ACS could once again get the telephone
banks ringing in the fund-raising drives, to initiate positive research
as to the possible connection between vaccination and the incidence
of cancer. Somehow, we suspect that ACS will not follow this lead.
It would also look well etched in stone above the imposing entrance
to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, "I never saw a case
of cancer in an unvaccinated person." However, it is unlikely that
the High Priests of Modern Medicine will be able to give up one of
the Four Commandments. It will be necessary for an outraged public
to bring pressure to bear to abandon the modern ritual of sacrificing
our children to Baal in a five thousand year old ritual called, in its
modem version, "compulsory immunization."
Edward Jenner (1796-1839) "discovered" that cowpox vaccine
would supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth century
scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and
some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the
century, due to a number of contributing factors. After the use of
cowpox vaccine became widespread in England, a smallpox
epidemic broke out which killed 22,081 people. The smallpox
epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In
1872, 44,480 people were killed by it. England finally banned the
vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely
heralded "contributions" which that country had made to modem
medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory
vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its
dangers were hurried off to jail.

Japan initiated compulsory vaccine in 1872. In 1892, there were
165,774 cases of smallpox there, which resulted in 29,979 deaths.
Japan still enforces compulsory vaccination; however, since it is a
militarily occupied nation, its present government can hardly be
blamed for submitting to the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly.
Germany also instituted compulsory vaccination. In 1939 (this
during the Nazi regime), the diptheria rate increased astronomically
to 150,000 cases. Norway, which never instituted compulsory
vaccination, had only fifty cases during the same period.
Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant
conclusion that the great flu "epidemic" of 1918 was solely
attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in
which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston
Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by
vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were
filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of
the vaccine. The epidemic was called "the Spanish Influenza," a
deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal
its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those
who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In
recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called "the
Russian Flu." For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps
because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down
the party line.

The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk
magazine notes that "during the Franco-Prussian War, every
German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288
otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was
high."
At the annual ACS Science Writers Seminar, Dr. Robert W.
Simpson, of Rutgers University, warned that "immunization
programs against flu, measles, mumps and polio may actually be
seeding humans with RNA to form proviruses which will then
become latent cells throughout the body . . . they can then become
activated as a variety of diseases including lupus, cancer,
rheumatism and arthritis."

This was a remarkable verification of the earlier warning
delivered by Dr. Herbert Snow of London more than fifty years
earlier. He had observed that the long-term effects of the vaccine,
lodging in the heart or other parts of the body, would eventually
result in fatal damage to the heart. The vaccine becomes a time
bomb in the system, festering as what are known as "slow viruses,"
which may take ten to thirty years to become virulent. When that
time arrives, the victim is felled by a fatal onslaught, often with no
prior warning, whether it is a heart attack or some other disease.
Health Freedom News, in its July/August 1986 issue, noted that
"Vaccine is linked to brain damage. 150 lawsuits pending against
DPT vaccine manufacturers, seeking $1.5 billion damages."

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:09 pm

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/we-are-th ... -americans
WE ARE THE MAJORITY: 56% of Americans Believe COVID Shots Caused Mass Deaths

The public is waking up—and it cannot be stopped.
Image

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Fri Mar 13, 2026 12:05 pm

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/massiv ... ine-injury
MASSIVE EPIDEMIC OF VACCINE INJURY: Overwhelming Evidence Reaches Washington, D.C.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher presents evidence at the MAHA Institute Round Table on mass casualties linked to childhood vaccines and COVID-19 mRNA injections.
All 13 Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Studies Found the Same Pattern

To determine whether vaccines improve health outcomes, the proper comparison is vaccinated children vs. completely unvaccinated children. There are now 13 studies making this comparison.

All show the same pattern: vaccinated children are significantly sicker across all health outcomes.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by Guest » Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:09 am

https://curioushumanproductions.substac ... a-molecule
The Kory Scale: A Brilliant Analytical Framework

One of the most original contributions of this book is what Dr. Kory calls the “Kory Scale,” a proposed metric to judge the safety and efficacy of therapies based on the intensity of suppression they receive from the medical establishment. The concept is elegantly simple: the more viciously a cheap, unpatentable therapy is attacked by the FDA, NIH, AMA, media, and government agencies, the more likely it actually works. He calculates the Kory Scale score for ivermectin at roughly 100 to 150 points, while chlorine dioxide scores over 500 points, a staggering indictment of the coordinated persecution this compound and its advocates have endured.
A Spy Novel Hidden Inside a Medical Book

What sets this book apart from most alternative medicine literature is that it genuinely reads like a geopolitical thriller. Dr. Kory’s anonymous source, referred to only as “Count Mondragon,” is an 85-year-old retired applied scientist with high-level security clearances who provides a jaw-dropping account of how chlorine dioxide was known to bioweapons researchers decades before Jim Humble ever set foot in Guyana. The Soviet defector and bioweapons expert Vladimir Pasechnik reportedly described chlorine dioxide in 1985 as “the ultimate antidote to all bioweapons” and was later found dead under deeply suspicious circumstances. His colleague David Kelly, one of the UN’s chief weapons inspectors, was similarly “suicided” after working on chlorine dioxide research. These are not conspiracy theories. Dr. Kory presents them as documented, sourced accounts with sobering implications.

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by Oh wee oh » Sun Mar 01, 2026 10:24 am

Oh wee oh poooooooolio

Yes, it was already gone by the time the eugenics Dr. (Salk - go read his eugenics books Survival of the Wisest) came up with the "vaccine".

The whole thing is a joke. We figured out hygiene/sewage. Vax due very little to nothing.

Now they majorly harm. But $$$ yearly is good (for pharma)

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Tue Feb 24, 2026 9:28 am

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/the-forg ... ne-history
Polio didn’t disappear the way you think it did.

Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.


But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.

First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.

What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”

Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”

Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.

But it gets worse.

The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”

So what about the virus?

Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”

When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”

Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”

Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.

And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about?

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

by tim » Sun Feb 08, 2026 11:00 am

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/ep ... rength-the
The FDA greenlit a human trial of an "immortality elixir" containing SV40!

I wish I were making this up, but I am not that creative.
Yes, cancer cells are technically immortal. Also, for this elixir to “work”, a continuous regimen of antibiotics and steroids needs to be taken indefinitely!

On January 27, the press brought this great news for the immortality seekers: “In major test for longevity field, FDA greenlights study on a ‘near total reset’ of cells”.

Life Biosciences, a biotech startup co-founded by Harvard biologist David Sinclair, got the FDA’s permission to begin a clinical study of its gene therapy designed to rewind the clock on dying cells.

Life Bio calls its approach partial epigenetic reprogramming, and its clinical trial will be the first to test the concept in humans. It falls under the broader umbrella of experimental therapies known as cellular rejuvenation, which is a major focus of several well-funded startups backed by tech executives.

Ok, right away, we see the usual made-up meaningless jargon: epigenetics (a narrative rescue device for failure of 97% of genome to “code” for anything) and calling the toxic gene therapy class “cellular rejuvenation”. Of course it is…

Top