Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

BOMBSHELL: Former Pussycat Dolls Member Gravely Injured by COVID Jab Says “Deadly Lot” Also Killed Her Mom

Jessica Sutta says she lost her health, her mother, and her Hollywood career after speaking out and warns that “too many people are dying” while society normalizes it.

Why Did the FDA Try to Discredit Ivermectin During COVID in 2021?

Just as a reminder as to what an amazing medicine ivermectin is: Ivermectin was discovered in the late 1970s through a collaborative effort between the Kitasato Institute in Japan and Merck & Co. Satoshi Ōmura, a microbiologist at Kitasato, isolated a novel Streptomyces bacterium (S. avermitilis) from a soil sample collected near a golf course in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, and cultured it for analysis. William Campbell, a parasitologist at Merck, then tested Ōmura's bacterial cultures and identified the potent antiparasitic activity of the fermentation products, which were named avermectins. A chemically modified derivative — 22,23-dihydroavermectin B₁, branded as ivermectin — proved to be both more potent and better tolerated. It was first approved for veterinary use in 1981 and rapidly became one of the most widely used antiparasitic agents in livestock and companion animals. Its transition to human medicine came in 1987, when Merck made the landmark decision to donate the drug indefinitely for the treatment of onchocerciasis (river blindness) in endemic regions of Africa and Latin America — one of the most celebrated acts of pharmaceutical philanthropy in history. It was subsequently approved for human use against strongyloidiasis and other helminthic infections, and its impact on global neglected tropical diseases was so profound that Ōmura and Campbell were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015. In subsequent decades, ivermectin attracted research interest well beyond parasitology, including studies on its antiviral properties and, more recently, its potential anticancer mechanisms — areas that remain active fields of investigation.

Ivermectin is one of the safest medicines in the world, on par with fenbendazole and other antiparasitics like albendazole that are given to billions of people every year as part of public health mass drug administration initiatives to control parasitic infections (Kory, 2021; WHO, 2023).

As discovered and detailed in the book, Cancer is a Parasite, nations around the world that use antiparasitics like fenbendazole as part of public health mass drug administration initiatives have at least one-half the cancer incidence rate of nations like the US that do not have any such programs (despite undiagnosed, asymptomatic, untreated epidemic-scale parasitic infections that are themselves chronic inflammation-based cancer risk factors in the US population according to the CDC). For example the US has a cancer incidence rate of over 300/100k while India has under a 100/100k rate. Virtually every one of the 123 nations of the world that use antiparasitics have at least half the cancer incidence rate of the 62 mostly Western, definitely wealthy, nations that don’t!

So the answer to today’s question: Why did the FDA try to discourage people from trying ivermectin as a treatment for COVID? Because antiparasitics like ivermectin and fenbendazole, with their proven anticancer actions, would have inadvertently dramatically lowered the cancer incidence rate in the US and other nations that used ivermectin as a COVID treatment and would have destroyed the lucrative cancer treatment business. That’s why. If there is a better explanation, please, let’s hear it.

The fiasco of the 1976 ‘swine flu affair’

It was around 10:30 in the morning on 12 October 1976, and Imperato was at the Chelsea Health Clinic, an Art Deco building in the lower west side of Manhattan. The clinic was one of around 60 locations dotted around New York, preparing to vaccinate almost everyone in the city.

That year, fears of a swine flu pandemic had loomed large, so President Gerald Ford had ordered an unprecedented mass vaccination of everyone in the United States. As Imperato rolled up his sleeve, it was the first day of the effort in New York.

Imperato was deputy health commissioner and the chair of the task force charged with rolling out the programme in the city, so had volunteered to be photographed for the newspapers as he got his shot. The mayor of New York City, when asked, had refused, so Imperato had stepped up. Turnout was strong across the city that morning.

But what was meant to be a ceremonial opening and positive public relations effort would turn sour. That week, the papers had begun reporting troubling news from vaccine clinics in Pittsburgh: three apparently unexplained deaths due to heart attacks.

“I remember that day. I remember it vividly,” recalls Imperato. “I saw those headlines on the subway. And I said, ‘Good God. All hell is breaking loose here.’”

In what is now known as "the Great Swine Flu Massacre," the
President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade
the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving
force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the
major drug manufacturers. They had a "swine flu" vaccine which
suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out
their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from
the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other
market, humans. The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine
came directly from the Disease Control Center in Atlanta, Georgia.
Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral
Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in
Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the
advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election
campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter
offered no serious threat in the election. Suddenly, out of Atlanta,
came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national
immunization campaign against "swine flu." The fact that there was
not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter
the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had
been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs,
which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious
conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one
bright young man remarked, "Well, if the swine breeders won't
inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into
people."


85



The Ford sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early
death, when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris,
formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at
the Food and Drug Administration, declared that there could be no
authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases
of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public
with his statement that "at no point were the swine flu vaccines
effective." He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done.
The damage control consisted of that great humanitarian, Walter
Cronkite, and the President of the United States, combining their
forces to come to the rescue of the Medical Monopoly. Walter
Cronkite had President Ford appear on his news program to urge the
American people to submit to the inoculation with the swine flu
vaccine. CBS then or later could never find any reason to air any
analysis or scientific critique of the swine flu vaccine, which was
identified as containing many toxic poisons, including alien viral
protein particles, formaldehyde, residues of chicken and egg embryo
substances, sucrose, theimorosal (a derivative of poisonous
mercury), polysorbate and some eighty other substances.

Meanwhile, back at the virus laboratories, after Dr. Anthony
Morris has been summarily fired, a special team of workers was
rushed in to clean out the four rooms in which he had conducted his
scientific tests. The laboratory was filled with animals whose
records verified his claims, representing some three years of
constant research. All of the animals were immediately destroyed,
and Morris' records were burned. They did not go so far as to sow
salt throughout the area, because they believed their job was done.

On April 15, 1976, Congress passed Public Faw 94-266, which
provided $135 million of taxpayers’ funds to pay for a national
swine flu inoculation campaign. HEW was to distribute the vaccine
to state and local health agencies on a national basis for inoculation,
at no charge. Insurance agencies then went public with their warning
that they would not insure drug firms against possible suits from the
results of swine flu inoculation, because no studies had been carried
out which could predict its effects. It was to foil the insurance
companies that CBS had Gerald Ford make his impassioned appeal
to 215,000,000 Americans to save themselves while there was still
time, and to rush down to the friendly local health department and
get the swine flu vaccination, at absolutely no charge. This may
have been CBS' finest hour in its distinguished career of "public
service."

Hardly had the swine flu campaign been completed than the
reports of the casualties began to pour in. Within a few months,
claims totalling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had
suffered paralysis from the swine flu vaccine. The medical
authorities proved equal to the challenge; they leaped to the defense
of the Medical Monopoly by labeling the new epidemic, "Guillain-
Barre Syndrome." There have since been increasing speculations
that the ensuing epidemic of AIDS which began shortly after Gerald
Ford's public assurances, was merely a viral variation of the swine


86



flu vaccine. And what of the perpetrator of the Great Swine Flu
Massacre, President Gerald Ford? As the logical person to blame for
the catastrophe, Ford had to endure a torrent of public criticism,
which quite naturally resulted in his defeat for election (he had
previously been appointed when the agents of the international drug
operations had ushered Richard Nixon out of office). The unknown
Jimmy Carter, familiar only to the supersecret fellow members in
the Trilateral Commission, was swept into office by the outpouring
of rage against Gerald Ford. Carter proved to be almost as serious a
national disaster as the swine flu epidemic, while Gerald Ford was
retired from politics to life. Not only did he lose the election; he was
also sentenced to spend his remaining years trudging wearily up and
down the hot sandy stretches of the Palm Springs Golf course.

In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, March 16-March 23, 2026

Ex-FBI chief Robert Mueller; billionaire Leonid Radvinsky (43, C); actors Nicholas Brendon, Seth Peterson (28); TV producer Eric Overmyer; cohost Kiki Shepard (Showtime at the Apollo); & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Amanda Peet has breast cancer; GMA's Sam Champion has "sudden heart scare"; Perez Hilton in hospital with sepsis; Phillies' Daniel Robert has "cardiac event" in bullpen; IS: journo Oren Nahari has ALS

UK: TV's Jordan Brook has meningitis; sportscaster Danny Kelly has throat cancer; rugby star Abi Burton has encephalitis; AU: footie Jonathan Brown has "shock brain tumor diagnosis"; & more

CDC Jeopardized Health of ‘Millions of Americans’ by Failing to Warn of Stroke Risk After Pfizer Vaccine

New documents obtained by Sen. Ron Johnson reveal that health officials under the Biden administration downplayed COVID-19 vaccine safety risks and delayed warning the public.

COVID-19 “Vaccines”: One of the Most Catastrophic Medical Experiments in History
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher joins Navy SEAL David Rutherford to expose the origins and catastrophic consequences of the COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign.

They Retracted the 2025 Paper That Proved Fenbendazole Cures Cancer

Here’s Why That Tells You Everything.

Big Cancer tipped its hand — and showed its true colors.

A medical journal just retracted one of the most significant papers ever published on fenbendazole as a cancer treatment. Three patients. Three different solid tumor metastatic cancers. All three in complete or near-complete remission. No adverse effects. Sustained over years.

That paper is now gone from the literature (it is available for download as a PDF but its content are not indexed or searchable on PubMed). And the reason given for pulling it is one of the most cynical acts of institutional overreach on record.

I want to tell you exactly what happened — and why it matters far more than the retraction itself. I took this retraction personally, not because I was an author, but because I supplied all the case report data that comprised the paper. One case is my mother-in-law, one has become a good friend and another is a stellar individual always ready to help others. They submitted their information faithfully to help others and that effort was stolen from them.

The Paper

Published in Case Reports in Oncology in May 2025, Makis et al. documented three patients with Stage IV cancers — breast, prostate, and melanoma — who achieved dramatic and durable remissions after incorporating fenbendazole into their treatment regimens. Two achieved complete remission. One near-complete remission. All three tolerated fenbendazole without any reported adverse effects. All three remained in remission through the entire follow-up period, ranging from 11 months to nearly three years (Makis et al., 2025).

The lead author was Dr. William Makis, an oncologist who has treated cancer patients with fenbendazole and other repurposed antiparasitic drugs. His paper passed peer review. It was accepted and published. It entered the medical literature.

And then it was retracted.

The “Reason” — and Why It Is Fabricated

The retraction was ordered by the journal’s Editor, Dr. Maurie Markman, on the grounds that Dr. Makis had an undeclared financial interest — specifically, that at the time of submission he offered services related to the topic of the study, i.e., he treats cancer patients with fenbendazole. The retraction statement noted that “the author’s response when contacted were found to be unsatisfactory” and concluded that “these concerns would have affected the interpretation of the work” (Case Reports in Oncology, 2026).

Read that again and let it sink in.

Fenbendazole is an off-patent, over-the-counter veterinary antiparasitic. It costs pennies per dose. No pharmaceutical company owns exclusive rights to it. No one profits handsomely from its use. As reviewed by Nguyen et al. (2024), fenbendazole’s patent expired in the early 1990s, making it available as a generic drug accessible through animal supply stores and online platforms. The “financial interest” claimed against Dr. Makis — a physician helping patients with a drug that generates essentially no revenue — is not just weak. It is nonsensical.

THE ULTIMATE CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY: Study Involving Over 1 Million Children Finds Myocarditis Only Occurred in Covid-Vaccinated Children

There were ZERO myocarditis cases in unvaccinated kids. Let that sink in.

CDC Buried COVID Vaccine Death Data in Lancet Study, Internal Documents Reveal

CDC researchers altered their own study on COVID-19 vaccine adverse events to downplay deaths linked to the shots, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense.

WHO Convenes Global Session to Dictate How the Coming Influenza Pandemic Will Be Run

Foreign pandemic governance cartel is "[p]reparing for and responding to an influenza pandemic."

The World Health Organization will convene an online international pandemic control session on Wednesday, March 18, centered on the unelected globalist group’s Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP) Framework, according to a WHO press release.

PIP is the international structure through which the WHO, a foreign syndicate, dictates how influenza virus samples are transferred worldwide, and how pandemic vaccines, antivirals, and diagnostics are allocated once an influenza pandemic response is activated.

The new pandemic control session, organized through the WHO’s Epidemics and Pandemics Information Network (EPI-WIN), will decree how governments, laboratories participating in the WHO influenza surveillance network, and pharmaceutical manufacturers operate under the framework during an influenza pandemic response.

The United States is still participating in WHO pandemic surveillance networks (here)—including the organization’s CoViNet sentinel surveillance system, which now spans 45 reference laboratories worldwide—through institutions such as Emory University, Ohio State University, and the CDC, despite President Donald Trump’s executive order publicly withdrawing the country from the organization earlier this year.

Excess deaths in Australia cannot be explained by any other mechanism other than the COVID shots

Lataster paper, published in peer-reviewed literature, shows a pattern of excess deaths that authorities don't even attempt to explain other than by hand-waving assertions that do not fit the data