by Higgenbotham » Sun Jun 07, 2026 4:13 pm
Higgenbotham wrote: Mon Sep 02, 2024 7:58 pm
Last weekend, I had a wide ranging 2 hour conversation with a young woman (age 18) who is the daughter of immigrants to the US. I've noticed many immigrants don't think this is the land of milk and honey once they've been here for awhile, but some of the things this young woman said were quite surprising to me.
I don't use the words "dark age" when talking to people in real life, but several topics that have been discussed in this virtual dark age hovel came up.
She asked me what I thought of AI. I said the first thing that comes to mind with regard to any new technology is whether you believe the civilization is on the ascent or the decline. If you believe the civilization is on the ascent, and you are right about that, then AI will probably on net be a positive and force for good. However, if you believe that the civilization is on the decline...at which point she interjected, "Oh, definitely!"...and then I finished my thought.
Which of course the thought I finished was that if you think the civilization is on the decline then any new technology such as AI in particular will be a net negative and a force for evil.
What is Mo Gawdat referring to when he says children are being molested on camera and nothing is being done?
When Mo Gawdat discusses the horrors of children being molested on camera, he is referring to the global crisis of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) and live-streamed child exploitation rings. He frequently points to this grim reality to emphasize the moral and ethical failures of humanity, expressing deep frustration that despite having advanced surveillance and digital tracking technologies, the networks that produce, buy, and trade this material continue to thrive.
Specifically, his critique focuses on a few compounding issues:
Digital Scale: Global authorities (such as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children) receive tens of millions of cyber tips and track hundreds of millions of files containing child exploitation, but law enforcement agencies are constantly overwhelmed and unable to keep pace with the volume of abuse.
Live-Streamed Abuse: He frequently references the dark commercialization of this crime, such as international, on-demand webcam operations that allow predators to pay for the live-streamed abuse of children.
Technology and Ethics: Gawdat argues that humanity's flawed value system allows these "unspeakable" crimes to continue. He points out that while technology is highly capable of identifying and stopping this content, the monetization of human attention on social platforms and an overall lack of societal awareness allow the dark web and exploitative networks to flourish in plain sight.
The above was generated by Google AI. I had seen a clip of this in an introduction to a video on Diary of a CEO, which is what prompted my question.
[quote=Higgenbotham post_id=88715 time=1725321496 user_id=100]
Last weekend, I had a wide ranging 2 hour conversation with a young woman (age 18) who is the daughter of immigrants to the US. I've noticed many immigrants don't think this is the land of milk and honey once they've been here for awhile, but some of the things this young woman said were quite surprising to me.
I don't use the words "dark age" when talking to people in real life, but several topics that have been discussed in this virtual dark age hovel came up. [u]She asked me what I thought of AI. I said the first thing that comes to mind with regard to any new technology is whether you believe the civilization is on the ascent or the decline. If you believe the civilization is on the ascent, and you are right about that, then AI will probably on net be a positive and force for good. However, if you believe that the civilization is on the decline...at which point she interjected, "Oh, definitely!"...and then I finished my thought.[/u][/quote]
Which of course the thought I finished was that if you think the civilization is on the decline then any new technology such as AI in particular will be a net negative and a force for evil.
[quote]
What is Mo Gawdat referring to when he says children are being molested on camera and nothing is being done?
When Mo Gawdat discusses the horrors of children being molested on camera, he is referring to the global crisis of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) and live-streamed child exploitation rings. He frequently points to this grim reality to emphasize the moral and ethical failures of humanity, expressing deep frustration that despite having advanced surveillance and digital tracking technologies, the networks that produce, buy, and trade this material continue to thrive.
Specifically, his critique focuses on a few compounding issues:
Digital Scale: Global authorities (such as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children) receive tens of millions of cyber tips and track hundreds of millions of files containing child exploitation, but law enforcement agencies are constantly overwhelmed and unable to keep pace with the volume of abuse.
Live-Streamed Abuse: He frequently references the dark commercialization of this crime, such as international, on-demand webcam operations that allow predators to pay for the live-streamed abuse of children.
Technology and Ethics: Gawdat argues that humanity's flawed value system allows these "unspeakable" crimes to continue. He points out that while technology is highly capable of identifying and stopping this content, the monetization of human attention on social platforms and an overall lack of societal awareness allow the dark web and exploitative networks to flourish in plain sight.[/quote]
The above was generated by Google AI. I had seen a clip of this in an introduction to a video on Diary of a CEO, which is what prompted my question.