John wrote:
> In the name of self-defense individuals would be allowed to shoot
> anyone who enters their home, even in the absence of a clear
> physical threat.
...
The sentence of mine that you quoted was copied word for word from the
AFP source I referenced in the article:
Yes, I am aware that it was verbatim from AFP; I should have been more clear that I am suggesting that AFP has poor wording. The AFP statement was not in quotes and was certainly a paraphrase. Most likely a poor one.
AFP is generally pretty reliable, and the article claims to be
summarizing the key proposals from the policy document published by Di
Maio and Salvini.
I was unable to find the actual policy document online. If you can
find it online, then please post a link to it, and let's take a look
at how the actual policy document describes the proposal.
I am basing my assumption on previous statements by Salvini and common sense. I don't think anyone (no, not even Italian politicians) would be hare-brained enough to think that attacking invited guests for entering your home was any kind of self-defence. The law favoured by Silvani's Northern League other minority parties back in May 2017 (see
AFP's article), would remove the requirement to prove "proportionality" for defence in cases like night-time break-ins. I am assuming it is the same law that is included it the joint proposal.
Although the article says the document is "published," I can't find it online either. If anyone can find this policy proposal please post a link.