Search found 4182 matches
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:06 am
- Forum: International events
- Topic: Sino-American war
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9031
Re: Sino-American war
Stopping 90% of 3,000 nukes means 300 mushroom clouds on American soil.
- Mon May 09, 2011 4:33 pm
- Forum: Generational Theory
- Topic: 9/11 as it happened
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3861
9/11 as it happened
John: I don't know the best place for this thread...move it if you like. For those homelanders and younger millennials who don't remember the beginning of our current Crisis, the recent death of Osama Bin Laden and the upcoming decade anniversary have inspired me to post this, so you could see how i...
- Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:04 am
- Forum: Weblog News Comments and Discussion
- Topic: 20-Dec-10 News-All forces on high alert on Korean peninsula
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4737
Re: 20-Dec-10 News-All forces on high alert on Korean penins
Forgot to log in for my Xmas speculation.
- Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:43 am
- Forum: Science, Technology and the Singularity
- Topic: EMP novel
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3109
EMP novel
WILLIAM R. FORSTCHEN ONE SECOND AFTER
I always had a head knowledge that EMP would kill the vast majority of Americans in a matter of months, but it never hit home till I read this book.
Read it. Contact your Congresspeople to prepare for an EMP attack. Pray we have time.
I always had a head knowledge that EMP would kill the vast majority of Americans in a matter of months, but it never hit home till I read this book.
Read it. Contact your Congresspeople to prepare for an EMP attack. Pray we have time.
- Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:13 am
- Forum: Science, Technology and the Singularity
- Topic: Molecular Nanotechnology in the CoC World War
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5305
Molecular Nanotechnology in the CoC World War
It is plausible that Drexlerian molecular nanotechnology will be developed during the CoC World War. http://www.crnano.org/timeline.htm The war could even catalyze the development of nanotechnology as WWII catalyzed the development of nuclear technology. Which side is likely to develop it first? How...
- Sat Jun 19, 2010 12:34 pm
- Forum: Generational Theory
- Topic: Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18311
Re: Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time
http://counter-factual.net/upload/showthread.php?t=7104
is the thread of the sequel to my story.
http://www.counter-factual.net/upload/s ... php?t=7100
is the comments thread
Free registration is required.
I kept the established Point of Divergence date, btw.
is the thread of the sequel to my story.
http://www.counter-factual.net/upload/s ... php?t=7100
is the comments thread
Free registration is required.
I kept the established Point of Divergence date, btw.
- Sun Dec 20, 2009 2:00 pm
- Forum: Generational Theory
- Topic: Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18311
Re: Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time
I will lose my job soon, probably at the end of next month. I plan to make a project in my spare time of "Journal of a Repeater", which will be a diary of mine starting in 1986 in TL-5. Our timeline will have to be TL-0, as I "died" a couple months ago in TL-1 and I don't want to be faced with the C...
- Sun May 03, 2009 11:49 am
- Forum: International events
- Topic: Afghanistan, Pakistan and India
- Replies: 37
- Views: 36160
- Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:44 pm
- Forum: Finance and Investments
- Topic: Financial topics
- Replies: 29822
- Views: 16777215
Re: Financial topics
Forgive the OT, but this is how I best know how to reach most of you.
I posted a quick sequel to "Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time" on the generational history board. If you liked it, here is another taste. And if you haven't read it, now is your chance.
I posted a quick sequel to "Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time" on the generational history board. If you liked it, here is another taste. And if you haven't read it, now is your chance.
- Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:41 pm
- Forum: Generational Theory
- Topic: Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time
- Replies: 14
- Views: 18311
Re: Maybe We'll Get It Right This Time
It is ten years after Supernova 1987A. I gave them the date...heck, with neutrino astronomy I could give them the time (0735 UTC and some odd seconds). And the progenitor matched no models for pre-supernovae, not even close. So a couple days later, some nice gentlemen came to my home and politely as...