Suppress the truth?

[gerald]

Dave Talbott via bizmailtoday.com
9:00 PM (19 hours ago)

to me
THUNDERBOLTS PROJECT
Update
August 3, 2013



ELECTRIC COMET DOCUMENTARY NOW ON VIMEO

The recent YouTube takedown of the Thunderbolts Project "Electric Comet" documentary has provoked a remarkable response, suggesting that a large and growing community understands very well the issues at stake.

The takedown was due to a single complaint of copyright infringement by astronomer Travis Rector at the University of Alaska. Prompted by astronomer Sean Walker, Rector filed a complaint with YouTube, in disregard for both fair use and fair play. Unwittingly, he provoked an outpouring of criticism that caused him to hide the story he'd published on his own Facebook page as criticism continued to pour in.

On matters such as this, public consciousness has come a long way in recent years. Take away the fair use principle and the same people who manage taxpayer funding within the sciences will also control the flow of information and ideas. When foundational theory is thrown into question, a publicly supported jobs program will typically resort to science by news release. Its advocates will seek to maintain an illusion, to suggest that "all is well in our science." But what if facts discovered by their own scientists challenge the cover story from start to finish? That's when the program's Inquisitors will resort to "copyright infringement" claims, seeking to deny public access to data and images gathered at taxpayer expense.

YouTube is a huge enterprise, and it's understandable that copyright and fair use issues are left almost entirely to an automated system. To move beyond the automated process may require litigation. Our own intent is to go to court if necessary. The essential contribution of fact-based criticism in the sciences REQUIRES the fair use principle, and the documentary in question is the poster child for fair use—an ideal opportunity to test well-established but often-ignored provisions of the law. (See our forthcoming report within the next ten days.)

In the meantime, we've now placed the documentary on Vimeo, which is the leading alternative to YouTube, particularly for communities exploring challenges to institutionalized theory:
https://vimeo.com/71642784

If you have any doubt as to the objective value of the "Electric Comet" documentary, we invite you to review this factual presentation (still in its original form for critical review prior to the final edit). Please speak up for the essential principles of fair use and fair play—wherever you can reach people who care about truth first and not the preservation of cherished dogma in the sciences.
____________________________

[gerald]

If the truth is unbelievable or supposedly impossible, remove the data. example ----------
Removal of cosmic ray data. http://www.suspicious0bservers.org/daily-news/ --- Sept 28, 2013, under daily news heading
True science is suppose to be objective -----------
-------------------------------
Question ----------- How do we make intelligent decisions based on incomplete data?

[gerald]

This could get interesting --------------

This Saturday Dec. 14, 2013 photo released by China's Xinhua News Agency, shows a picture of the moon surface taken by the on-board camera of the lunar probe Chang'e-3 on the screen of the Beijing Aerospace Control Center in Beijing, capital of China. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/phot ... TE=DEFAULT

Interesting colors on the moon.

If NASA has been hiding the truth about the moon or elsewhere, will NASA be able to convince the Chinese to hide the truth as well?
An image of an apparent old manufactured artifact on Mars. from Mars anomaly research http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evid ... rbug-2.htm ---NASA image ---
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images ... 1_DXXX.jpg ( object - center right side of image )

Suppose the West has been hiding the truth about extraterrestrial life to protect the religions of, Christianity, Judaism and indirectly Islam. ( Brookings report 1961 -- http://www.exopaedia.org/Brookings+Report report. On p. 216 recommendations are made for more studies. The suggestion that "such information (...) be withheld from the public" is also explicitly made.). Since the Chinese are not in general followers of the stated religions why not come out with the "truth" and show that these religions could be or are bogus? The Chinese are then shown to tell/show the truth and the West hides the truth to protect their religions that "control the people". hmmmmm could get real interesting.

As a side note, what if the worlds religions could be proved bogus? Would people still fight for a false god? People quit fighting for false gods before. hmmmm

[John]

As a side note, what if the worlds religions could be proved bogus? Would people still fight for a false god? People quit fighting for false gods before. hmmmm

At most one religion can be true, since they all contradict
each other. Therefore, at least all religions
but one must be bogus.

[gerald]

As a side note, what if the worlds religions could be proved bogus? Would people still fight for a false god? People quit fighting for false gods before. hmmmm

At most one religion can be true, since they all contradict
each other. Therefore, at least all religions
but one must be bogus.

How about an off planet religion? --- "may the force be with you"? -- hmmm --- red pill or blue pill?

[gerald]

Nasa says Mars mystery rock that ‘appeared’ from nowhere is ‘like nothing we’ve ever seen before’

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 70323.html

An alien put it there for a laugh -- ha ha