Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com ... -now-admit
We were right! The UK ONS now admit that deaths in the vaccinated were categorised as unvaccinated in 2021

The ONS denied it then but admit it now.
In 2021 when the UK ONS (Office for National statistics) started releasing its vaccine by mortality status reports we exposed that there were large spikes in the non-covid death rates in the 'unvaccinated'. These spikes in mortality coincided with the first main vaccine rollout and did so for each age group (see this report, for example).

Here is the chart for non-covid mortality rates in weeks 1-38 of 2021 for the 60-69 age groups:

Image

The charts for the other age groups looked much the same.

We asserted that these obvious anomalies were a result of the standard ONS procedure of categorising anyone within 20 days of their first dose as ‘unvaccinated’. However, in our own discussions with the ONS they maintained that, although that method was used for their efficacy calculations, it was not used when it came to mortality. They clearly said that a person dying any time after vaccination was correctly categorised, as a vaccinated death, in the mortality data they regularly released to the public and which formed the basis of a massive public communication campaign encouraging vaccination.

To ‘explain’ the spikes the ONS pushed the implicit assumption that there was a phenomenon called the 'healthy vaccinee' effect, whereby they claimed that people ‘close to death’ were not vaccinated. And they made this bold claim without any data to support it whatsoever.

Apart from the fact that this would have contradicted the NHS policy at the time we showed that, while a healthy vaccinee effect might have partly explained the longer term lower non-covid mortality rates in the vaccinated, it could not possibly have explained those spikes in mortality rates.

They could only be explained by categorising deaths shortly after vaccination as unvaccinated. Yet the ONS, along with many of the staunchest covid vaccine disciples, doubled down on their insistence that such miscategorisation did not occur. To them all the anomalies in the ONS data could only be explained by the hallowed ‘healthy vaccinee effect’.

Later, the ONS did actually claim that there was indeed an ‘unhealthy vaccinee effect’ but did so to explain other anomalies in the data. Clearly the ONS was so self-serving they did not see the contradictions between these claims and simply wanted to have their cake and eat it.

As a result of a subject access request that Clare Craig submitted to the ONS we have now found out that we were correct after all!

Clare has posted on this twitter/X thread, an internal ONS email confirming that the NIMS database of vaccinated people, that the ONS relied upon, had excluded those people who had died before vaccine records had been sent back to the central system:


When we pointed out to the ONS exactly this possibility for miscategorisation in 2021 they continued to deny that it had happened (see Table 8 of our report here).

Why is this so important? Because the ONS data - possibly more so than any other source of data in the world - was used to bolster the claim that the vaccines were highly effective and safe.

And, as we have always argued, and which is now certain, any claims of efficacy and safety based on their data were completely illusionary and subject to the cheap trick of miscategorisation whereby even a placebo - or something even worse - could be ‘shown’ to be safe and effective.

They therefore lied and intentionally created and spread misinformation. We were accused of conspiracy thinking and our reputations were tarnished as a result.

But we were right!
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

tim
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-da ... -telegraph
The Dam Has Broken. UK's Telegraph says COVID shots "may be to blame for increase in excess deaths"

Front page. Penned by Sarah Knapton, Science Editor, who has written truthful articles about COVID and deaths before
Image
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

tim
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://supersally.substack.com/p/austr ... r-february
Australian Mortality Data for February 2024 Released: The Mass Mortality Event is Clearly Ongoing as Excess Deaths Continue. 2024 COD Data shows a Clear Increase in Cancer and Respiratory deaths.

Men aged 0-44, and women aged 65-84 had their worst ever recorded February mortality in 2024. Males and females aged 75-84 both had their highest January mortality in 2024.
ABS no longer uses a baseline for these data releases, referring only to deaths in the same months in 2022 and 2023. Comparing 2024 deaths with those in 2022 and 2023, it would appear that death rates are “within range” and there is nothing to see. However, the failure to account for typical death rates prior to the “pandemic” is obfuscating the ongoing excess deaths.

I have prepared a baseline against which to assess excess deaths. This baseline inputs the 2015 to 2019 deaths into excel forecast, to forecast the numbers of deaths that would have been expected from 2020 though to 2024 and to arrive at a possible excess death count. Using this approach, the provisional January 2024 deaths are 8%, and the provisional February 2024 deaths are 1.9% above baseline.

It should be noted that the Covid-19 injectables rolled out in February 2021. February 2021 was the last ‘typical’ death month, marked with a red arrow in all of my figures. Thereafter, from March 2021 onwards, deaths inflected upwards, with a clear separation from all prior death levels: 2022 had exceptional excess deaths, 2023 was somewhat lower than 2022, and 2024 to February is running slightly higher than 2023. Highest annual and monthly deaths are highlighted below. The mass mortality event is still ongoing!
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5


Cool Breeze
Posts: 2966
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Cool Breeze »

Vindicated.

Guest

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Guest »

Cool Breeze wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 8:42 pm
Vindicated.
Good to see you back, CB.

Cool Breeze
Posts: 2966
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Cool Breeze »

Guest wrote:
Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:12 am
Cool Breeze wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2024 8:42 pm
Vindicated.
Good to see you back, CB.
Thanks, my man.

You will see, and are, what I've said is all coming true.

tim
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/ ... e-pathogen
Pathologists Are Unaware Of The Pathogen Killing The Vaccinated - A Consequence Of Medical Journal Censorship

I recently met with a "system" pathologist. Our conversation revealed a disturbing example of the deadly consequence of the immense and pervasive censorship of "inconvenient science."
Lets ignore most of that insanely ignorant answer and instead focus on the fact he is a pathologist, meaning his specialty is in identifying “pathogens.” A pathogen is any organism or agent that can produce disease. Pathologists are trained to identify abnormal changes in cells, tissues, and organs by examining samples obtained through biopsies, autopsies, or other procedures. Besides looking for gross, overt changes (atherosclerostic plaques, clots, infarcted tissues, dissected vessels etc, they also look for organisms, foreign bodies, and/or accumulations of cell types to detect inflammation and/or cancer.

One of the main ways that pathologists identify pathogens is by placing tissue samples on a microscope slide and then they apply a special dye or “stain” to the tissue and examine it under a microscope. They have innumerable stains which are designed to adhere to only the pathogen or cell of interest. If the pathogen or cell is not present in the tissue, no dye is taken up. If the organism or cell type is highly present it will pick up the colored stain and become easy to identify within tissues.

Based on the pathologists’ answer above, it became painfully clear to me that the global suppression of the science showing that the spike protein is a highly toxic and lethal pathogen (and the product of bioweapons research) has been shockingly successful. How did “they” pull this off? In my opinion, there were four main tactics or dynamics which led to this calamity:

Regulatory agencies across the world reversed the long-standing practice of considering any death or injury reportedly associated with a novel therapy to be considered caused by the therapy until proven otherwise. With the mRNA vaccines, agencies across the world instead immediately dismissed all reports of death and injury as unrelated until proven causative. I will give credit to Dr. Peter McCullough for being one of the first and most vocal to point out this unprecedented reversal of modern regulatory practice.

Coroners across the world (note they are all pathologists), with rare exceptions, have systematically avoided “staining for the spike protein” in autopsies. This has prevented them from determining the actual cause of death. As my dear friend and colleague Dr. Ryan Cole (a pathologist) has repeatedly said, “You can’t find what you are not looking for.”

The high impact medical journals censored and/or retracted any studies which performed comprehensive data analyses showing the widespread catastrophic effects of the vaccines (see next post for a detailed review of these unprecedented retractions). Interestingly, medical journals instead allowed the publications of individual case reports by the thousands (an unprecedented number of over 3,600 at my last count). However nearly every single publication describes the adverse event or death as “rare, very rare, or as yet unreported” while at the same time always including a sentence reminding the reader that the vaccines have been deemed “safe, effective, and have saved millions of lives.” What a world.

Mainstream news outlets were paid to willfully carry out the massive propaganda campaign of “safe and effective” while censoring and/or avoiding any mentions of injuries or death.

The actions above have caused widespread suppression of the evidence for the toxicity and lethality of the mRNA platform, and in particular, the spike protein as the pathogen itself. If you assume all deaths are unrelated to the vaccine or spike protein, and you make sure no pathologists can repeatedly prove cause by staining for spike in the autopsy specimens, you can create a situation where all the many thousands of reports of unexpected and sudden deaths are simply considered “tragic mysteries”and “unfortunate or rare occurrences.” Cue Ed Dowd’s aptly titled book, “Cause Unknown:”
Now, lets get to the point of this post. Fortunately, there have been a couple of renegade pathologists who appropriately investigated the unexpected deaths to try to identify whether the vaccine caused it. The most public were Drs. Arne Burkhart and Sucharit Bhakti from Germany and Dr. Ryan Cole here in the U.S. Despite Dr. Bakhti being retired, he was one of the most outspoken and has endured numerous attacks as a result (don’t read his Wikipedia page). Dr. Cole has unsurprisingly endured numerous attacks against his license and his business (insurance plans dropped him which forced him to sell his practice). Dr. Burkhart is now dead. He apparently died while swimming in a lake. No further comment.

Anyway, before Burkhart’s death, he performed autopsies and/or reviewed autopsy specimens using stains for the spike protein. He did this for families who consulted him with the belief that the vaccines caused their loved one’s death.

Burkharts’ findings are the most public because he gave lectures at several well publicized Covid conferences. One of the most memorable was at a conference in Sweden in January of 2023 that I also lectured at. We were all in awe of both him (smart, expert, kind, friendly) and his lecture.

He reported on 51 autopsies that he and his team performed secondary investigations of. In each case, the families consulted his team because they suspected the vaccine had caused their loved ones death. Note the local coroner had not stained for spike protein.

patient ages ranged from 21 - 94 years old, 26 men, 25 women

all deaths occurred between 7 days to 6 months from last mRNA vaccine

all were described as “sudden or unexpected deaths”

local coroners ruled nearly all as “natural or uncertain cause of death”

families refused to believe the coroners conclusion

families first consulted other pathologists who declined to look at the slides

they then consulted Burkhart and his team of 10 international pathologists, coroners, biologists, chemists and physicists

As of August of 2022, they had fifty-one cases completed and about a hundred by January 2023 ( his lecture was only on the first 51, the results of the others are still unknown to me and is part of the point of this post). Again, the original autopsies were done by hospital pathologists or coroners and all but two cases were deemed uncertain or natural causes. One case was surprisingly deemed by a local coroner as “probably due to vaccination” (my guess is the patient was probably pretty healthy and died within hours of the shot, i.e. it didn’t take a sleuth - this is pure conjecture/hypothesis on my part by the way).

Burkhart’s team stained for both the virus (using a “nucleocapsid” stain as the nucleocapsid is the outer envelope of the virus) and a stain for the spike protein itself in order to differentiate coronavirus spike from vaccine manufactured spike (the mRNA that is injected does not code for nucleocapsid as it should have). When no nucleocapsid was present but the spike protein was identified, they deemed the spike protein to be produced solely by the mRNA from the vaccine.

They then classified all deaths in one of three ways in regards to the vaccine/spike protein being the cause: “highly likely/ likely,” “possible/unclear,” and “ruled out” (one case). They found that in 80% of cases, the vaccine induced spike protein contributed to or directly caused documented physiologic damage in the vessels and tissues which led to the death of the patient. Of note, nineteen of the deaths were “sudden adult death syndromes” and fifteen of those deaths occurred outside the hospital.
The spike protein stain they created works as depicted below. Basically, once a cell takes up the mRNA and begins expressing spike protein on its surface, our immune cells produce antibodies that attach to the spike protein (given it is a supposedly foreign protein). The stain is made up of an antibody that attaches to our own spike antibody and it has an enzyme which causes the deposit of a brown pigment when it attaches.
Below is tissue from the prostate of a man who died from the vaccine. The round, clear areas are tiny glands in the prostate. The glands are literally circled and/or filled with brown stained spike protein. Note this is in the prostate. Not in the arm.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

tim
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

tim
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests