** 19-May-2021 World View: Dr. Breeze's jokes
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 9:22 pm
> Again, and this is for the third time, I did not say that people
> on this forum are degenerates and satanists.
Yes you did and you know exactly where I'm talking about. For the
third time, you're lying.
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 9:22 pm
> The truth about velocity is that no one "understands" it, which is
> why I know that you don't --> no one does.
Is this your idea of a joke? First you said that I don't understand
velocity, and you told me to ask a question, so I asked you why.
Instead of explaining why, you just say that no one "understands"
velocity. So you purposely evaded the question. One thing is
certain: You don't understand velocity, and don't have a clue what
you're talking about.
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 9:22 pm
> But again, inflation is in the eye of the beholder, which is why
> the CPI is silly and mostly propaganda, by and large.
No it's not. It's a measurable quantity. The fact that you don't
understand it doesn't mean that it's just silly propaganda, since
pretty much everything you say is silly propaganda, and in a sense
everything that the government puts out is silly propaganda. Indeed,
even the population is silly propaganda, since the census is inexact.
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 9:22 pm
> If you trace the M2 with the equities markets, they are straight
> line since QE began = directly related asset inflation.
Is this part of your joke? You're switching from the CPI to the DJIA?
I guess you don't know the difference. You really don't have a clue.
You don't understand velocity, or M2, or CPI or DJIA. You don't have
a clue about anything. You're no different than Butler. You're not
in this forum to learn. The only reason you're in this forum is to
show contempt for the other members of the forum.
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 9:22 pm
> Everything I say is backed by facts and then make
> conclusions.
Another joke. No, you make up "facts" or quote irrelevant "facts" and
evade answering ("no one understands velocity"), and your conclusions
are full of crap.
Cool Breeze wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 9:22 pm
> Notice I don't call people names or worry about emotional
> things. That's how critical thinking cream rises.
Geez, you really are full of bullshit aren't you. When you write
things like "Or do you purposefully ignore things just because you
want to?" then you're indirectly calling someone a liar, but you are
not honest enough to say what you mean. I don't beat around the bush.
I say that you're full of crap and I mean it. When you say that you
don't call people names, you're lying.
You said I should ask you questions instead of assuming what you
believe. So I asked you two questions. I asked you what I don't
understand about velocity, and you said nobody understands velocity.
I asked you about the crash in velocity in the last year, and you
never even mentioned that.
So your request that I ask you questions is another lie. You have no
intention of answering questions. It's just one evasion after
another, and one lie after another. You're just plain full of crap.