Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

[Guest]

Read the last several responses of his to mine, and then try making that argument (did you not read "racist bigot" - classic leftist woman name calling by JOHN, not CB). I can't repost all of my responses to substantiate the above, but they are on this site regarding economics (where he can't even properly define terms) all the way to GD (where he is the best except for predictions) and politics in general (also very sharp and almost always correct).

Again, this is how a woman fights. "Look at what he did to meee and then you can understand why I pissed on his head." Men take the high road.

Again, read my friend (who I don't know or what content you put into the site). You are actually doing the same thing, if you are doing anything at all. I don't mind, but it's curious that you'd opine just to kiss someone's ass and say nothing all at the same time.

I'm more than happy to maintain your thread at your level. You wouldn't want to take the high road, would you?

[Cool Breeze]

I already stepped away from this, no problem.

[John]

** 17-Aug-2021 World View: Emotional just like a woman

> Sorry to disappoint. I know you don't dislike me as much as you
> let on.

I don't dislike you at all. I just think you're full of crap a
lot of the time. I don't dislike Mazanec or Butler either.

> The funny thing about the forum is the unwelcome attitude many of
> us get who are clearly on the same side (not Bob Butler's) yet
> just want people to think and clarify their positions,
> particularly the ones that have been wrong or taken wayyyy longer
> than anyone wants to admit here. It's not everyone, and I know our
> personality types can be know-it-alls, but we are also truth
> seekers so it is pathetic when you counter someone on his not
> having predicted X, be able to explain y, or speak accurately on
> Z, and then he just gets emotional like a woman or a Bob Bish type
> character.

> You said John "just gets emotional like a woman." I was going to
> underline the parts of your response where you got emotional like
> a woman. Problem is, it is the whole response so I couldn't do
> it.

> Let's make a list:

> Burner and I agree
> John always puts my posts in another thread
> occasionally calls me names
> he hasn't been right in decades
> he can't muster responses to the criticisms
> butt hurt is all we get
> he doesn't care though
> he posts crazy shit
> which is sad
> the funny thing about
> the unwelcome attitude many of us get
> clearly on the same side
> taken wayyyy longer than anyone wants to admit
> so it is pathetic

> These phrases are what women use when arguing with men. Someone
> else agrees with me. He calls me names. He's never right. He
> doesn't answer me. He doesn't care. He's crazy. Etc. I think
> they call it gaslighting.

> Again, read my friend (who I don't know or what content you put
> into the site). You are actually doing the same thing, if you are
> doing anything at all. I don't mind, but it's curious that you'd
> opine just to kiss someone's ass and say nothing all at the same
> time.

First off, I have no idea who the "Guest" is, so if he's sucking up
to me then he's wasting his time.

Having said that, your conversation with him has been absolutely
hilarious.

I started laughing when you said that I "get emotional just like a woman."
In years past, when I was dating, women accused me of being too logical.
Furthermore, I thought that many of your responses were "just like a
woman."

However, I didn't say anything about it, but I thought it was very
funny when the mysterious "Guest" made that list of phrases where
you were emotional just like a woman.

So I think that the "Guest" enjoys sticking it to you in the same way
that you try to stick it to me.

[Cool Breeze]

** 17-Aug-2021 World View: Emotional just like a woman

> Sorry to disappoint. I know you don't dislike me as much as you
> let on.

I don't dislike you at all. I just think you're full of crap a
lot of the time. I don't dislike Mazanec or Butler either.

> The funny thing about the forum is the unwelcome attitude many of
> us get who are clearly on the same side (not Bob Butler's) yet
> just want people to think and clarify their positions,
> particularly the ones that have been wrong or taken wayyyy longer
> than anyone wants to admit here. It's not everyone, and I know our
> personality types can be know-it-alls, but we are also truth
> seekers so it is pathetic when you counter someone on his not
> having predicted X, be able to explain y, or speak accurately on
> Z, and then he just gets emotional like a woman or a Bob Bish type
> character.

> You said John "just gets emotional like a woman." I was going to
> underline the parts of your response where you got emotional like
> a woman. Problem is, it is the whole response so I couldn't do
> it.

> Let's make a list:

> Burner and I agree
> John always puts my posts in another thread
> occasionally calls me names
> he hasn't been right in decades
> he can't muster responses to the criticisms
> butt hurt is all we get
> he doesn't care though
> he posts crazy shit
> which is sad
> the funny thing about
> the unwelcome attitude many of us get
> clearly on the same side
> taken wayyyy longer than anyone wants to admit
> so it is pathetic

> These phrases are what women use when arguing with men. Someone
> else agrees with me. He calls me names. He's never right. He
> doesn't answer me. He doesn't care. He's crazy. Etc. I think
> they call it gaslighting.

> Again, read my friend (who I don't know or what content you put
> into the site). You are actually doing the same thing, if you are
> doing anything at all. I don't mind, but it's curious that you'd
> opine just to kiss someone's ass and say nothing all at the same
> time.

First off, I have no idea who the "Guest" is, so if he's sucking up
to me then he's wasting his time.

Having said that, your conversation with him has been absolutely
hilarious.

I started laughing when you said that I "get emotional just like a woman."
In years past, when I was dating, women accused me of being too logical.
Furthermore, I thought that many of your responses were "just like a
woman."

However, I didn't say anything about it, but I thought it was very
funny when the mysterious "Guest" made that list of phrases where
you were emotional just like a woman.

So I think that the "Guest" enjoys sticking it to you in the same way
that you try to stick it to me.

I don't see any of that as being in tune with reality, like all of Bobby Bish's posts. But it is amusing, since I'm sure that you are very logical in dealing with other humans. That's why we agree with most world related issues and politics. Who knows who Guest is, but there is no basis in his critique, either.

On to better things.

[Guest]

** 17-Aug-2021 World View: Emotional just like a woman

> Sorry to disappoint. I know you don't dislike me as much as you
> let on.

I don't dislike you at all. I just think you're full of crap a
lot of the time. I don't dislike Mazanec or Butler either.

> The funny thing about the forum is the unwelcome attitude many of
> us get who are clearly on the same side (not Bob Butler's) yet
> just want people to think and clarify their positions,
> particularly the ones that have been wrong or taken wayyyy longer
> than anyone wants to admit here. It's not everyone, and I know our
> personality types can be know-it-alls, but we are also truth
> seekers so it is pathetic when you counter someone on his not
> having predicted X, be able to explain y, or speak accurately on
> Z, and then he just gets emotional like a woman or a Bob Bish type
> character.

> You said John "just gets emotional like a woman." I was going to
> underline the parts of your response where you got emotional like
> a woman. Problem is, it is the whole response so I couldn't do
> it.

> Let's make a list:

> Burner and I agree
> John always puts my posts in another thread
> occasionally calls me names
> he hasn't been right in decades
> he can't muster responses to the criticisms
> butt hurt is all we get
> he doesn't care though
> he posts crazy shit
> which is sad
> the funny thing about
> the unwelcome attitude many of us get
> clearly on the same side
> taken wayyyy longer than anyone wants to admit
> so it is pathetic

> These phrases are what women use when arguing with men. Someone
> else agrees with me. He calls me names. He's never right. He
> doesn't answer me. He doesn't care. He's crazy. Etc. I think
> they call it gaslighting.

> Again, read my friend (who I don't know or what content you put
> into the site). You are actually doing the same thing, if you are
> doing anything at all. I don't mind, but it's curious that you'd
> opine just to kiss someone's ass and say nothing all at the same
> time.

First off, I have no idea who the "Guest" is, so if he's sucking up
to me then he's wasting his time.

Having said that, your conversation with him has been absolutely
hilarious.

I started laughing when you said that I "get emotional just like a woman."
In years past, when I was dating, women accused me of being too logical.
Furthermore, I thought that many of your responses were "just like a
woman."

However, I didn't say anything about it, but I thought it was very
funny when the mysterious "Guest" made that list of phrases where
you were emotional just like a woman.

So I think that the "Guest" enjoys sticking it to you in the same way
that you try to stick it to me.

I don't see any of that as being in tune with reality, like all of Bobby Bish's posts. But it is amusing, since I'm sure that you are very logical in dealing with other humans. That's why we agree with most world related issues and politics. Who knows who Guest is, but there is no basis in his critique, either.

On to better things.

If you need a basis for the critique, here you go,

Stop being emotional like a woman, shut up, and go back to doing the dishes.

Got it?

[Cool Breeze]

I suspect the Guest is John. As I said before, not only is that lame, even if it's not John, it is someone who is such a loser he won't let it go precisely when I took the high road (as the stooge asked before).

As I said, on to better things.

[John]

** 19-Aug-2021 World View: Emotional just like a woman

> I suspect the Guest is John. As I said before, not only is that
> lame, even if it's not John, it is someone who is such a loser he
> won't let it go precisely when I took the high road (as the stooge
> asked before).

> As I said, on to better things.

Really? You think that I'm the only person in the world who would
want to mock you? No, I'm not the Guest, and I don't know who the
Guest is. But the Guest is definitely someone with a sense of humor,
which you appear to be lacking.

You brought this on yourself when you said that I "get emotional just
like a woman." Anyone who makes that kind of idiotic personal attack
deserves what he gets. But as you said, on to better things.

[Cool Breeze]

Why do you keep this going? I said, moving on. What's so hard to understand about that?

[John]

** 19-Aug-2021 World View: Movin' on

> Why do you keep this going? I said, moving on. What's so hard to
> understand about that?

Lol! You accuse me of being the Cool-mocking Guest, and you expect me
not to respond? You obviously have no idea how the world works.

If you want to end this discussion and move on, then it's simple:
Don't respond to this post, and ignore any further posts from the
Guest. You're welcome.

[Cool Breeze]

France allied with Russia because it was terrified of facing Germany alone. These days Germany is close to impotent militarily and is a close ally anyways. In fact, now that the UK has left, France is the paramount military in the EU.

I was born in Germany. Germans call their military a 'toy army' because politically Germans really can't use it ever again because of the Nazi past. Germans are much more interested in self-flagellation than fighting anyone. It is sad to see one of the world's great civilizations being completely destroyed and degraded without a single punch back in defense of itself.

They just need enough time to pass by, as this generation subverted by the jews and leftists still has a hold. Once the en vogue aspect of women leaders (marxist by design) passes away, you'll see proper relationship to country again. But of course you need a sense of godliness, otherwise this is what happens to you in the first place.