Re: Cool Breeze's Topic

[Guest]

"Climate Change?"

A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.

That's very telling. Shows you're scared of war and can't discuss it. You're a hyper-emotional little twit. Using worthless distractions like Bitcoin to calm your fears.

[Cool Breeze]

"Climate Change?"

A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.

When I see that comment, I know not to take you seriously.
https://www.edf.org/climate/9-ways-we-k ... ate-change

You don't understand global propaganda, then, Tom.

[Guest]

"Climate Change?"

A smart or wise person when he sees that doesn't take such a thing seriously. Pathetic.

When I see that comment, I know not to take you seriously.
https://www.edf.org/climate/9-ways-we-k ... ate-change

You don't understand global propaganda, then, Tom.

Stop gaslighting.

[Tom Mazanec]

Then which of those nine ways are wrong, Cool Breeze?

[Cool Breeze]

Then which of those nine ways are wrong, Cool Breeze?

1. Wrong - Co2 levels have been higher historically, many times, and humans weren't "burning" anything back during those periods.
2. Same idea, how was C02 ever higher previously? Shouldn't global warming increase forevermore? It didn't in the 40s and 50s, so that's why they had to change it to "climate change" something meaningless, as that is a fact of life for the world.
3. False by every climate historian ever, even alarmists don't claim this.
4. False, impossible to have causation, given the above.
5. Water vapor absorbs FAR MORE.
6. More of the same, unrelated and fluff for the article, discussed already above.
7. Solar cycles are WAY better predictors.
8. Every computer model is wrong and has been wrong, alarmists like Gore have been wrong over and over on the same basis. Why is that?
9. Flat out LIE.

But remember to donate to the EDF (ha!) at the bottom when you get scared by their lies. Or just walk outside and realize nothing burgers are everywhere, and propaganda, thus Occam's razor shows us sane people what's going on.

PT Barnum would be proud.

[Tom Mazanec]

Then which of those nine ways are wrong, Cool Breeze?

1. Wrong - Co2 levels have been higher historically, many times, and humans weren't "burning" anything back during those periods.
2. Same idea, how was C02 ever higher previously? Shouldn't global warming increase forevermore? It didn't in the 40s and 50s, so that's why they had to change it to "climate change" something meaningless, as that is a fact of life for the world.
3. False by every climate historian ever, even alarmists don't claim this.
4. False, impossible to have causation, given the above.
5. Water vapor absorbs FAR MORE.
6. More of the same, unrelated and fluff for the article, discussed already above.
7. Solar cycles are WAY better predictors.
8. Every computer model is wrong and has been wrong, alarmists like Gore have been wrong over and over on the same basis. Why is that?
9. Flat out LIE.

But remember to donate to the EDF (ha!) at the bottom when you get scared by their lies. Or just walk outside and realize nothing burgers are everywhere, and propaganda, thus Occam's razor shows us sane people what's going on.

PT Barnum would be proud.

1 WHAT historic time? And that has nothing to do with burning stuff releasing CO2.
2 Again, CO2 was higher in geologic Deep Time, when the sun was dimmer, and that does not answer the point (how much CO2 emitted). Temperatures dropped slightly in the 40s to 60s because of aerosols, which were reduced by Clean Air technolgy and regulation.
3 We have air trapped in icecaps showing CO2 lower than now for thousands of centuries.
4 Fossil fuels have no C-14. The carbon dioxide from them can be told from carbon in the biosphere.
5 Increasing one component increases the total. We are also adding SF6, HFCs, NO, CH4, etc.
6 The winters have moderated just where I live over my life. This is related
7 El Nino/La Nina better than sun for short term (few years), GHG levels better for long term (multi-decade)
8 Computer models are correct in general, they are getting better in specifics.
9 What do you think the percentage is?

[Cool Breeze]

Solar cycles are far better predictors than the embarrassment of modern "scientists" and Al Gore types. Read Shellenberger to get a clue. It's all a lie. Alarmism, just like covidism, just like all the other propaganda. Don't believe in a religion? Climate apocalypse is your end times. Gore and Fauci are high priests.

This stuff is obvious.

[Tom Mazanec]

https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

[Cool Breeze]

This is exactly my point of view, yes, DaK. The real communists are the Chinese and they have major power since our government leaders bestowed it on them, whether knowingly or not. Why wouldn't someone respect the way that VP is a leader of his own people? I haven't seen that here in the US perhaps since Ronald Reagan, and he wasn't an orthodox christian, or even have a front of being one.

Actually, neither China nor Russia are really communist. Both are fascist states with Russia having the trappings of democracy while China is more of an unapologetic police state.

Why would anyone respect Putin as a leader? He's lied, cheated and stolen to get into and keep himself in power as president for life. The only people allowed to run for office are the ones he allows while he and his cronies have looted the country and overseen its economic decline. he engages in crass and ridiculous spectacles supposedly to show his "manliness" such as riding horses bare chested or wrestling bears or lifting locomotives. he makes Trump look modest and bumble. And Putin isn't even a Christian other than in a generic non-religious sense.

Whether he is a christian, only God knows, but he has been to Mt Athos and publicly states he is an orthodox christian. I haven't seen that from a US president for years, nor any other supporting measure to back it. They don't allow degenerates to parade in their streets and corrupt the society and youth - very wise and also christian. He is for the sovereignty of his country, he disallowed the selling off of many capital and business functions of the former soviet states to outsiders (harvard boys do russia) which is largely why jews and thus the US don't like him, etc.

He is a great leader, regardless of what you say, and I just gave several reasons why. Think again.

[Guest]

The spike protein is a pathogen. This is known.

No.

The virus is the pathogen. The spike protein is what makes the virus pathenogenic.