German Scientists Find Evidence that EU Pfizer-BioNTech Batches Included Placebos
German scientists have uncovered startling evidence that a substantial portion of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine deployed in the European Union may in fact have consisted of placebos – and hence were not even subjected to quality-control testing by the German regulatory agency which was in principle responsible for approving their release.
Do you think Jennifer Gates got a placebo?tim wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 11:02 pmI still believe the injections are a CCP bio weapon attack as referenced in Chi Haotian's speech.Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:30 pmWhat are your theories (anybody, not addressed to any specific poster) on whether Jennifer Gates (Bill Gates' daughter and I believe a medical doctor now) took the jabs. I saw on social media some time ago that she said she took the first jab. I think this was in 2021. Did she really take the jab just like everyone else? I think understanding this is key to whether the jabs are part of a nefarious plot to depopulate the earth.
The Americans who are the powers that be that have pushed the shots or approved of them are what is called "useful idiots".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
The World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, whoever - might think they are saving the world by reducing human population but have failed to notice that the countries being injected are all countries that will be enemies of China and Russia in the next world war.In political jargon, a useful idiot is a term currently used to reference a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause—particularly a bad cause originating from a devious, ruthless source—without fully comprehending the cause's goals, and who is cynically being used by the cause's leaders.[1][2] The term was often used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and manipulation.[1]
There is evidence that specific batches of mRNA were reserved for Pfizer employees:Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:18 pmDo you think Jennifer Gates got a placebo?tim wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 11:02 pmI still believe the injections are a CCP bio weapon attack as referenced in Chi Haotian's speech.Higgenbotham wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:30 pmWhat are your theories (anybody, not addressed to any specific poster) on whether Jennifer Gates (Bill Gates' daughter and I believe a medical doctor now) took the jabs. I saw on social media some time ago that she said she took the first jab. I think this was in 2021. Did she really take the jab just like everyone else? I think understanding this is key to whether the jabs are part of a nefarious plot to depopulate the earth.
The Americans who are the powers that be that have pushed the shots or approved of them are what is called "useful idiots".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
The World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, whoever - might think they are saving the world by reducing human population but have failed to notice that the countries being injected are all countries that will be enemies of China and Russia in the next world war.In political jargon, a useful idiot is a term currently used to reference a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause—particularly a bad cause originating from a devious, ruthless source—without fully comprehending the cause's goals, and who is cynically being used by the cause's leaders.[1][2] The term was often used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and manipulation.[1]
It would seem reasonable to believe Pfizer and its corporate associates may be selectively reducing the associated risk of mRNA gene therapy vaccination for their employees and their employees families by providing them, through an employee vaccination program, with vaccine batches produced using a separate manufacturing process to the commercial scale one used to supply general populations.
Evidence for this is as follows:
It is known that the mRNA gene therapy vaccine solution can be produced using two substantively different processes, a clinical process and a commercial process.
It is known that the European Medicines Agency(EMA) expressed concerns with Pfizer over discrepancies between the clinical and commercial batches, pertinent to the safety and efficacy of the mRNA gene therapy vaccine solutions produced, and that commercial batches have a higher potential for risk than clinical batches.
It is known that Pfizer and Pfizer corporate associates vaccinate their employees and their employee's families with batches distinct and separate from the commercial ones given to general populations.
It is reasonable to believe that the data provided by the United States post market surveillance system, VAERS, suggests a profoundly uneven distribution of reported incidents of adverse events(AE) and death across batches of the mRNA gene therapy vaccine solution, indicating some batches are significantly more risky than others.
It is known, that at least in Australia, Pfizer employee batches are not tested by the country's regulatory agency which tests all commercial batches, and those batches marked for allocation to Pfizer employees have undergone odd modifications as to their regulatory status within the batch registry database.
The additional small quantities of vaccine used for this purpose are separate and distinct from those committed under the supply agreements entered in to with the European Commission and other governments, and will not impact BioNTech’s ability to meet its commitments under these supply agreements.
– Statement on Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccination for BioNTech Employees and Suppliers to Ensure Undisrupted Manufacturing and Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccine Doses, archive link
So the BioNTech employee and associate mRNA gene therapy vaccine solution was produced in small quantity batches "separate and distinct" from those "committed under the supply agreements" as to not "impact BioNTech’s ability to meet its commitments under these supply agreements". In other words, BioNTech did not use the commercial batch manufacturing process for itself and instead used the clinical batch manufacturing process. And it did this ostencibly to meet its commercial supply commitments.
Irregularities in the Australian Batch Registry for Vaccine Batches Allocated to The Pfizer Employee Vaccination Program
In Australia Pfizer(and assumably their associates) employees and their families have been allocated batches of their mRNA gene therapy solution exclusive from commercial batches administered to the general population. Both the commercial batches and the Pfizer employee batches are distinctly identified in the batch registry kept by the Therapeutic Goods Administration(TGA), which is the Australian equivalent of the American FDA or European Union EMA.
Out of a total of 62 Pfizer batches registered in Australia at present, 8 of them are allocated for the Pfizer employee vaccination program. These eight are:
FF0884* 12/8/2021
FA4598* 30/7/2021
FE3064* 25/6/2021
FA7338* 22/6/2021
FA7812* 22/6/2021
FC8736* 22/6/2021
FC3558* 21/6/2021
FD0927* 7/6/2021
According to their website, Pfizer Australia has 1,700 employees. Even accounting for family and corporate partners, it remains a little odd that 15% of all Pfizer batches registered in Australia would be allocated for use in the Pfizer Employee Program. Though it turns out they were, only some of the time.
These eight batches, unlike the other 54 commercial batches, are not tested by the TGA as are all commercial batches, as they instead recognise the testing certification done by the European Union's Official Control Authority Batch Release(OCABR).
Pathway one uses overseas certification as evidence that the batch has already undergone independent testing and assessment by a recognised National Control Laboratory, such as the in Europe.
The OCABR process involves assessment of manufacturing documentation (summary protocol review) and laboratory testing for potency, identity and appearance based on guidelines for specific COVID-19 vaccine types (e.g. RNA, viral vector, and inactivated vaccines).
When the Sponsor provides evidence that the batch supplied in Australia has passed OCABR testing, the vaccine can be released without the TGA conducting a manufacturing protocol assessment or (potentially) laboratory testing.
The Sponsor must still supply samples, batch details and evidence of the maintenance of adequate shipping conditions for the batch under this pathway.
OCABR certificates are unlikely to be available for all COVID-19 vaccine batches as their availability depends on many factors, including the final global distribution of a batch.
– TGA - Batch release assessment of COVID-19 vaccines
The status of these eight batches, as reflected in the TGA batch registry system, have undergone some irregularities throughout the course of 2021. The discovery of these irregularities were made by someone conducting an independent audit of vaccine supply to the Australian government. This audit can be found here, though it isn't pertinent to the issue at hand:
Covid Supply Background Notes Covid-19 Supply Audit
As of August 10th 2021, the TGA batch registry had five batches allocated to the Pfizer employee vaccination program.
Edward Dowd
@EdwardDowd
·
Jun 29
Hey Doctors out there…is 25 sigma above trend too high for Haematological System disorders? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We are going to need your help on our next report.
The so called governmental health authorities won’t be able to run from this data.
Stay tuned.
Posted on 9:45 PM · Jun 29th, 2023
Were Lab Animals Killed After mRNA Vaccination Trials to Hide Long-Term Adverse Consequences?
Scientists could follow test animals for a while post-vaccination, to keep humans safe - but they chose not to
In a joint article written with A Midwestern Doctor last October, we described a tragic case of vaccine-caused B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in a prominent COVID vaccine advocate, Belgian Prof. Michel Goldman.
A recent and seemingly unrelated study involving lab mice shows that Michel Goldman has counterparts in the murine (mouse) world. (hat tip to @ashmedaidaemon on Twitter, who has an amazing Substack and who wrote a nice summary of the study)
As in all other animal studies, the mice were planned to be sacrificed shortly after the booster. However, one mouse died from “turbo cancer,” as the researchers describe here:
This study highlights a lab mouse that developed B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma and died shortly after the booster from the same type of cancer as Prof. Goldman has.
Mice are not people. However, they are mammals, and their physiology is similar to humans - except that mice age 25 times faster. So, a month in the life of a mouse is over two years in terms of human life, as this study explains:
After 6 months of age, the maturational rate of mice is 25 times faster than humans. A feature of middle age is the presence of senescent changes in some, but not all, biological measures that will eventually change with age (e.g., biomarkers of aging). A middle-aged group can help determine if an age-related change is progressive or is first expressed only in old age. Mice should be at least 10 months old for inclusion in a middle age group and the upper age limit is about 14 - 15 months. This phase correlates to humans from 38 - 47 years old.
So, if mice could be followed for just 14 months, it would be roughly equivalent to following people for 38-47 years.
They did not do it!
They did not have time to wait with Covid vaccines, they say. It was a huge emergency, they say. Okay. Why could not they keep a few dozen vaccinated mice for a year?
In the Frontiers mouse study discussed, one mouse out of 13 developed a turbo-cancer (a lymphoma).
What if this happens to people in the same proportion over the long run? That would equate to millions of tragedies!
Was the decision to kill test animals based simply on considerations of cost? Or did greedy vaccine developers know that they better prevent the long-term consequences of Covid vaccines from becoming evident?
Do you think vaccine test animals were euthanized intentionally quickly so we would not know the long-term effect of Covid vaccines?
An Inexorable Rise in Excess Mortality Since the Vaccine Rollout
In a previous article I highlighted how studying core non-respiratory mortality (NRM) trends, which have been very stable over the last 10 years or so, can provide a useful yardstick to measure any kind of extraordinary change that might occur.
Since the vaccine rollout there have indeed been radical changes to this metric, so as we approach the halfway mark of 2023 I thought an update was warranted. Unfortunately there is still no evidence of any real slowdown of this alarming development.
Each year appears to be worse than the previous one, and but for the still unexplained spike in non-respiratory deaths at the very beginning of the pandemic, 2020 would have been broadly similar to the 2015-2019 average. Something therefore happened in 2021 that changed the picture radically.
In a shocking revelation made just three weeks prior to his death, Jo Linder had an insightful discussion with renowned fitness guru and social media influencer, Bradley Martyn.
The two discussed teenage substance abuse, thoughts on America, and the fitness industry.
A focal point of their dialogue was on vaccination, with Martyn inquiring if Linder had received the vaccine. Linder jokingly replied that he had received the “wax,” indicating he had indeed been vaccinated. He claimed he got peer pressured into the vax.
“I got the wax… Even four,” Linder reported.
Linder further elaborated on his experiences following vaccination, delving into the controversial topic of potential vaccine side effects. He mentioned undergoing plasma fluorosis, a process that involves the removal of heavy metals from the blood. The fitness enthusiast was worried about strange particles he had noticed in his blood following the procedure.
“Oh my God, this comes into weird controversy, conspiracy theory because I did blood cleaning twice,” Linder revealed. “After all this, I did a plasma fluorosis – taking out heavy metals and all that stuff. I did all this. I don’t know if this is too controversial, probably to say this.”
“I went to the doctor, and I did my blood work again because I take my blood work all the time. And then I show it to the doctor and we kind of see these particles and I’m like, what is this?”
“This is from this [vaccine],” Linder said. “And then I show it to another of my friends and there’s all kind of hidden websites that you can get to, but it’s like the dark media kind of and there’s even more conspiracies.”
Martyn couldn’t believe what he just heard, saying, “This is crazy as f-k. Because I know you’re the kind of guy who for sure you got your blood work all the time, and then you tell him you got the thing, and then you got your blood work. And then it was f-king crazy.”
Linder revealed he underwent plasma fluorosis to clean his blood.
“They take all your blood out, put it into this machine, and then clean it and bring it back. So we did this with the heavy metal cleaning and all this stuff, which supposedly cleaned my blood,” Linder said.
Linder also revealed he did D-dimer, a protein fragment from the breakdown of a blood clot.
“My d-dimer was this, and then after all this [plasma fluorosis], it was dead,” Linde said.
He said he did this program twice in six months period.
“I was so shocked. And the doctor was like, you need to do it, man, if you want to survive after you took these shots.”
HOLY MOLY!!
Listen to this interview from Joesthetics just a couple of weeks ago.
He took 4 jabs and found heavy metals in his blood.
Then died of aneurysm today!
China created COVID-19 as a 'bioweapon,' Wuhan researcher claims
Chao Shao asserts that the virus was deliberately engineered by China as a "bioweapon," and that his colleagues were tasked with identifying the most effective strain for spreading.
China deliberately engineered the coronavirus virus as a "bioweapon," a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher claimed this week in an interview conducted by Chinese-born human rights activist and author Jennifer Zeng.
Researcher Chao Shao asserts that the virus was deliberately engineered by China as a "bioweapon," and that his colleagues were tasked with identifying the most effective strain for spreading among various species, including people.
During the exclusive 26-minute interview, Chao Shao shared an anecdote involving another researcher named Shan Chao, who allegedly admitted to being provided with four strains of coronavirus by a superior.
Shan Chao was instructed to test these strains and determine which one had the greatest potential to infect multiple species, with a particular emphasis on human infectivity.
White House Banned From Meeting Social Media Executives After “Massive” Effort to Censor Covid Jab Dissent
Joe Biden’s officials have been temporarily banned from meeting with social media company executives due to what the judge agreed appeared to be a “massive” effort to censor dissent on Covid vaccines. The Telegraph has more.
A judge backed claims that the U.S. President’s administration, including the White House, had engaged in a “massive” attempt to stop Americans questioning the efficacy of vaccines online.
The injunction came after it was revealed last month that U.K. ministers set up a Counter-Disinformation Unit, which was used to target lockdown critics and those questioning the mass vaccination of children.
The U.K. Government used an artificial intelligence firm to monitor social media sites and flag opposition to vaccine passports.
Prosecutors in the Republican states of Louisiana and Missouri brought the case and accused the federal Government of being involved in a “censorship enterprise“.
They claimed that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by trying to block social media users exercising their right to free speech.
Thousands of communications between Government officials and technology companies during the pandemic have been collected and presented in the court case, which is known as Missouri v. Biden.
Judge Terry Doughty, who was appointed during the Donald Trump administration, issued an injunction which stops Mr. Biden’s officials talking to social media companies about “protected speech”.
In his ruling, the judge banned Government departments from contacting social media companies for “the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech”.
A final ruling in the case has yet to be made by the judge.
In the injunction, he said that the Attorneys General from Louisiana and Missouri had “produced evidence of a massive effort by defendants, from the White House to federal agencies, to suppress speech based on its content”.
Social media and other technology companies have in the past communicated regularly with the Government, including during elections and in the pandemic.
In his injunction, the judge said there could still be communication if the Government needed to issue warnings about a national security or criminal threat.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests