What do you think. The bloods sugar meter says 67. John lied again. The former happens less than once a month. I suppose there are gaps between posts, but it seems the lies from John come continuously. The glucose reading could have serious consequences. John’s opinion does not. Hmm…. I think I will go with the glucose meter?
Again, I agree we have a gun and drug problem. Republicans are doing their best to support Second Amendment rights, and I’m generally with them, but there is a lot of gun violence. We ought to find a way to slow down the violence while making sure law abiding citizens can own and carry weapons. Alas, the Republicans are blocking all movement on this as they are blocking all else. Maybe now that the NRA people have violated the laws regulating such groups in New York, we might have some chance of progress.
I considered what the Tulsa Massacre was. I came to the conclusion that the nature of race riots changed significantly around MLK’s time. Before the Civil Right Movement peaked, the instigators and perpetrators were whites oppressing and murdering blacks. That continued until at least Selma. Later, the black looters and arsonists would wipe out black neighborhoods. Not constructive in my opinion, but it was the oppressed minorities showing rage against oppression that were instigating, not the white supremicists using violence and murdering. It showed a balancing point where the oppression weighed poorly compared to the rage against the oppression. Thus, there was a basic change.
What is happening in Chicago is neither. Drug gangs are fighting for turf. It has become fashionable, when one is to suicide, to take as many people as you can with you. Some of the homicides are race related, but summing everything together no matter what the cause is hardly justified. No race riots of either sort. No single large event causing hundreds of deaths lead by a racially motivated group. Wiki noted that Tulsa was the latest event of it's type in history. That can harry be true if a Tulsa Massacre is happening regularly.
And no, I am not cheering the violence. What evidence do you have of my doing so? I suppose lying makes it easier to make up propaganda, but do you think your followers are stupid? If all your vaunted ability to research is shown to be laziness in generating stalinist propaganda, you don’t think people will notice?
I’d like to believe conservatives aren’t as stupid as you seem to believe. Maybe it is just your following?