Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/ch ... -influenza
China Engineers Mutant H5N1 Influenza Viruses 560,000 Times More Lethal in Mammals: Journal 'Emerging Microbes & Infections'

As the U.S. simultaneously performs similar gain-of-function lab experiments.
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/fam ... settlement
Family Receives $373,000 Federal Settlement After Fatal Guillain-Barré Case Following Flu Vaccine: My Vaccine Lawyer

U.S. VICP vaccine injury system has paid out $5.6 billion in compensation—roughly $403,000 per day—since its founding.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack ... ipulations
One of the Greatest Manipulations Humanity Has Ever Known." She Told the Truth About the Pfizer Vaccine. Then Her Body Broke.

One biostatistician’s 25 years of industry experience. Four-and-a-half years of relentless analysis. And a death that should never have happened.
What She Found

Cotton didn’t rely on pre-coded variables for deaths. She searched every symptom text field for phrases like “Death,” “Patient died,” “Pronounced dead,” “Found dead,” “Patient expired” — and added missing death data where the text clearly documented it.

The results were, and remain, chilling.

Thousands of deaths temporally linked to vaccination. A previously unseen volume of serious adverse events. Specific risk groups, including pregnant women with alarming rates of miscarriage and fetal complications.

Under normal circumstances —before 2020— these signals would have immediately suspended any vaccine campaign.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com ... the-states
Canada, land of the dead (and the state's ongoing cover-up of that macabre toll)

Justin Trudeau, and many others, must one day stand in the dock with Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci and all their peers and patrons
In doing our compilations of those who have “died suddenly” worldwide since the COVID “vaccination” rollout, we’ve found that Canada appears to lead the world, with between 400 and 500 deaths per week. This number is especially striking, since Canada’s “free press” has done its best, or worst, not to report such deaths by turbo-cancer, heart disease, stroke and other ailments more exotic, as well as deaths with no cause given, even when the decedents were unnaturally young.
The Canadian government’s desperation to keep its eugenicist campaign under wraps has entailed the conviction, last year, of Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus for Discreditable Conduct. Why? Because she had not asked permission to investigate a cluster of infant deaths in Ottawa.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/iverm ... screwworms
Ivermectin Effective Against New World Screwworms Larval Stages (L1, L2, L3)

As New World screwworms emerge in Texas and New Mexico, the evidence suggests ivermectin may be one of the most effective defenses in both animals and humans.
I guess this time they won't be able to say:

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously y’all. Stop it.”

12 field studies conducted in South America — where New World screwworm outbreaks are common — found that ivermectin provided more than 97% protection against screwworm infestations in wounds under real-world conditions.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/what-is-sids
What Is SIDS?

An Essay on the Diagnostic Category Built to Receive What Cannot Be Officially Named
Before 1969, this category did not exist. Before organized vaccination programs expanded in the 1960s, what was then called crib death was so rare that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics.² The term Sudden Infant Death Syndrome was created in 1969 in response to a rise in unexplained infant deaths that coincided with expanded vaccination campaigns. By 1972, SIDS had become the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality in the United States, the leading cause of death between 28 days and one year of age.³ A category that had not existed three years earlier had become the dominant verdict on dead infants.
The 1967 Pediatrics review by Maria Valdes-Dapena examined the world literature on sudden unexpected infant deaths from 1954 to 1966. The review documented a rising phenomenon in industrialized nations, with the author professing herself “woefully ignorant” of the cause.⁵ The deaths were already occurring. They had not yet been categorized.

A causal connection to vaccination was made early. Within fifteen years of the Valdes-Dapena review, William Torch presented findings at the 1982 American Academy of Neurology Conference identifying DPT vaccination as a potential cause of the deaths the new category had been created to receive.⁶ The category was new. The deaths were not. What was new was the schedule that produced them and the institutional naming that made them legible only as a syndrome of unknown origin.

In 1969, when the term Sudden Infant Death Syndrome was created, the United States was four years past the introduction of the measles vaccine and five years past the licensing of the oral polio vaccine. DPT was being administered at expanded coverage. Mumps and rubella vaccines had been licensed. The childhood schedule was growing rapidly. Pre-1969, organized vaccination of infants was limited; crib death was rare and unstratified.² The temporal alignment between the expansion of the schedule and the creation of the category to absorb the resulting deaths went unnoticed because nobody was looking. There was no institutional reason to look.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

The 1979 revision of the International Classification of Diseases eliminated all cause-of-death classifications associated with vaccination.⁴ Previous versions of the ICD had listed “prophylactic inoculation and vaccination” as a separate cause-of-death category, with subcategories for deaths caused by specific vaccines. The 1979 revision and every subsequent update removed these. Since 1979, medical certifiers have had no code to assign vaccine-related deaths to. They are required, by the structure of the manual they use, to assign the death to a different category.

The asymmetry this produces is striking. The same federal government that maintains the ICD code structure also operates the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. As of May 2021, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program had awarded more than $4.5 billion in compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths.⁷ The federal government, in one capacity, compensates families for deaths caused by vaccines. The same federal government, in another capacity, removes the cause-of-death code that would allow those deaths to be officially documented in mortality statistics. The compensation requires the cause; the mortality statistics deny it. Both are operated by the same institution.

This structure has been in place for forty-six years. Every infant death that has occurred in temporal proximity to vaccination since 1979 has been recorded under a different code than the one that would name what happened. SIDS, “accidental suffocation,” “unknown cause,” “unspecified viral disease,” “diseases of the blood,” “cardiac arrest,” and “shaken baby syndrome” are among the 130 categories that have absorbed these deaths.² The codes operate as containers. The volume of what they contain has grown as the schedule has grown.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com ... ddenly-a74
In memory of those who “died suddenly” in the United States and worldwide, June 1-8, 2026

Reality star Duane Ollinger (Mystery at Blind Frog Ranch); Disney singer Peabo Bryson; Tejano singer Ruth (C); gaming creator Alex Cimo (32, C); sports announcers Stacey King, David Halberstam; & more

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cd ... illion-for
CDC Awards Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More COVID Vaccines: SAM.gov

Despite demand collapsing to just 17% among adults and 9% among children, per CDC data.
Americans Increasingly Reject COVID Vaccines

The move comes as federal health agencies continue promoting updated COVID-19 vaccines despite declining uptake among the general public and ongoing debate over the risk-benefit profile of repeated vaccination, particularly for healthy children.

Only 9% of children are reported by the CDC to be up to date with the 2025─26 COVID-19 vaccine, emphasizing the low demand among the young demographic.

Just 3.0% of parents say they even plan to vaccinate their child.

The same report shows only 17% of adults received the 2025─26 COVID-19 vaccine.

Rasmussen polling shows more than half of voters think COVID-19 vaccines “may have killed many people.”

The national telephone and online survey found that 56% of likely U.S. voters consider it likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 32% who believe it’s very likely.

COVID vaccines alone have been linked to 1.6 million adverse events, according to CDC VAERS data.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.arkmedic.info/p/would-you- ... asles-with
Would you like some measles with that?

The measles vaccine is the poster child of the vaccine industry... but is it really a vaccine at all?
So the process involves injecting a live virus into an egg, letting the developing embryonic cells harbour and replicate that virus (viruses need live cells to replicate). Once they have done that a few times and got the virus to grow they then took the virus stocks and got them to replicate in embryonic cell culture (that is, baby chicken cells) in cell flasks.

And why do they use embyronic (baby chicken) cells?

Because those of you that have experienced a pregnancy will know that embryonic cells grow really fast (OK a pregnancy might seem really slow, but in cell terms it isn’t - it’s as fast as a cancer growth).

This is great for the vaccine manufacturers but might not be so great if those high turnover cell DNA fragments end up in the wrong place. Anyway that’s just a theoretical risk, nothing to worry about I’m sure.

I mean, nobody minds a bit of Avian Leukosis Virus with their vaccine if you’re fighting that really dangerous measles, right?

Anyway don’t take my word for it - this CDC publication outlines the risks of using animal cells for vaccine propagation.

Of course none of that matters to the pharmaceutical industry. And purely because such things are theoretical risks the whole industry moved to “specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken flocks”. You know, just in case.

Thank God that our vaccine industry is omnipotent and knows how to mitigate every biological disaster - otherwise we might be seeing a rise in cancer rates or something.

Yeah about that.

“A person born in 1990 has quadruple the risk of colon cancer compared to a person born in 1950”


I wonder what happened between 1950 and 1990?

Coincidentally the Enders vaccine (along with a few others such as the SV40-containing polio vaccines) came onto the market and were rolled out to children across the very Western nations that are seeing this dramatic rise in cancers in people born after 1950.

Of course Business Insider knows that it’s not that - nope, it’s the marathon runners eating processed foods. Obviously.

Anyway, we created a new virus vaccine and we should be able to make a fortune from it by calling it “attenuated”. It should sell like hotcakes.

Perhaps they should have called their new virus/vaccine “Special Chicken Adapted Measles” or SCAM-V for short.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1843
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/what- ... l-syndrome
What Is Alpha-Gal Syndrome?

An Essay on Anaphylaxis to Bovine Proteins, the Tick Story That Followed, and the Proposal to Deploy It
Charles Richet sensitized dogs to raw meat by injecting bovine proteins into their bloodstream, then documented the catastrophic systemic collapse that followed.¹ He named the response by pairing the Greek ana (against) with phylaxis (protection), marking it as the failed inverse of what vaccinators had been promising.² He had been refining the experimental program since 1902.

The procedure was deliberate. The dogs were fed cooked meat first, with their white blood cell levels measured as normal. When they were fed raw meat, those levels rose, which Richet attributed to the digestive system mounting a defense against proteins it had not finished modifying. He then bypassed digestion entirely by injecting the raw meat proteins directly into the circulation. The dogs developed anaphylaxis: violent, systemic, sometimes fatal.

The work is not obscure. Richet’s 1913 Nobel lecture lays out the mechanism, and standard immunology textbooks have reproduced it ever since. He demonstrated the phenomenon in dogs, cats, rabbits, horses, and frogs, and described its universality across species in his acceptance speech.³ He named the mechanism precisely. Anaphylaxis is the body’s response to proteins that have bypassed the modifying action of the digestive tract and been introduced directly to the circulation. The first injection sensitizes. After an incubation period of weeks, a second exposure (by injection, or by ingestion) triggers the violent response.⁴

Dogs eat raw meat all the time without developing anaphylaxis. Richet was clear about this at the 1913 International Medical Congress in London. “Experimental alimentary anaphylaxis is difficult to bring about under conditions of healthy digestion, since it is a question of toxalbumins or nutritive albumins ... because the digestive juices actively intervene in transforming these albumins and rendering them innocuous.”⁵ The condition is created by combining injection with subsequent exposure. Injection is the maker.

A hundred and seven years before the lone star tick was credited with producing meat allergy in humans, the Nobel committee gave its highest medical honor to a Frenchman who had created meat allergy in dogs by injecting bovine proteins into them. The mechanism was published in the peer-reviewed literature of every Western country and recognized at the highest institutional level. The condition now called alpha-gal syndrome is the same mechanism, in the same direction, against the same proteins. Only the cover story has changed.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests