Now, why would you say that?John wrote:** 17-Mar-2020 World View: China
I guess you don't believe a word that I've ever written.FishbellykanakaDude wrote: > Military hostilities, in my opinion, are WAY off, as the
> belligerents will need to deal with a bunch of exigencies for
> quite a while.
> Wars (military hostilities) start when one side can't convince the
> other side that their "absolutely necessary whatever" should be
> allowed to be "given to/purchased by" them. Wars start when
> someone feels cornered and denied.

Nothing I said above contradicts GD Theory. If you think it does, please explain. <chuckle!>
These wars are inevitable. It's the timing of them, within relatively strict bounds, that is subject to variance.
Panics start actual hostilities, and panic is a function of frustration and anxiety from some perceived existential threat.
Panic is always a bad move, but when "cornered" ANY move seems better than NO move, and by far the most prevalent choices are panic moves at that point.