Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Once again, it's quite possible that Bandar is funding jihadists in
Syria, but Bandar's bragadaccio that he controls the Caucasus
terrorists is absurd. Also, saying that Bandar got a Dagestan
militant to send his wife to be a suicide bomber in Volgograd just to
keep Bandar happy is really ridiculous. If Bandar even tried
something like that, Putin would retaliate, and it wouldn't be
pleasant. Bandar himself would be a dead man. These kinds of
terrorist attacks from Dagestan, Chechnya and Ingushetia happen all
the time since the Chechen war. Bandar can neither cause them nor
prevent them.

John wrote:Once again, it's quite possible that Bandar is funding jihadists in
Syria, but Bandar's bragadaccio that he controls the Caucasus
terrorists is absurd. Also, saying that Bandar got a Dagestan
militant to send his wife to be a suicide bomber in Volgograd just to
keep Bandar happy is really ridiculous. If Bandar even tried
something like that, Putin would retaliate, and it wouldn't be
pleasant. Bandar himself would be a dead man. These kinds of
terrorist attacks from Dagestan, Chechnya and Ingushetia happen all
the time since the Chechen war. Bandar can neither cause them nor
prevent them.

Granted --- However, wouldn't Russia and China like to end the petrodollar? And since governments are duplicitous how about a false flag event to justify an otherwise unjustifiable action?

For example -- a ridiculous possibility, --- Russia pushes the Saudi,. This hostility becomes well known. Even though Bandar can't control all of the terrorists during the Winter Olympics in Russia it is assumed he can ( he said so ) The terrorists make a real big mess of the Olympics. Russia blames the mess on Bandar because Bandar SAID HE COULD control the terrorists. Which then gives Russia justification to do something to the Saudi. And with Washington the way it is, Russia might pull it off and further weaken the dollar and US standing. Just saying. Oh and just think of the potential impact on the economies of some countries if Saudi oil does not flow DURING THE WINTER. Sounds like playing Russian roulette, the question is who is playing and how many bullets are in the chambers.

cheers

gerald wrote:

John wrote:Once again, it's quite possible that Bandar is funding jihadists in
Syria, but Bandar's bragadaccio that he controls the Caucasus
terrorists is absurd. Also, saying that Bandar got a Dagestan
militant to send his wife to be a suicide bomber in Volgograd just to
keep Bandar happy is really ridiculous. If Bandar even tried
something like that, Putin would retaliate, and it wouldn't be
pleasant. Bandar himself would be a dead man. These kinds of
terrorist attacks from Dagestan, Chechnya and Ingushetia happen all
the time since the Chechen war. Bandar can neither cause them nor
prevent them.

Granted --- However, wouldn't Russia and China like to end the petrodollar? And since governments are duplicitous how about a false flag event to justify an otherwise unjustifiable action?

For example -- a ridiculous possibility, --- Russia pushes the Saudi,. This hostility becomes well known. Even though Bandar can't control all of the terrorists during the Winter Olympics in Russia it is assumed he can ( he said so ) The terrorists make a real big mess of the Olympics. Russia blames the mess on Bandar because Bandar SAID HE COULD control the terrorists. Which then gives Russia justification to do something to the Saudi. And with Washington the way it is, Russia might pull it off and further weaken the dollar and US standing. Just saying. Oh and just think of the potential impact on the economies of some countries if Saudi oil does not flow DURING THE WINTER. Sounds like playing Russian roulette, the question is who is playing and how many bullets are in the chambers.

cheers

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2iaYY21uv
"Saudi Arabia severs diplomatic ties with the US over response to conflict in Syria" -- if true
And who is playing Russian roulette with whom?

gerald wrote:

gerald wrote:

John wrote:Once again, it's quite possible that Bandar is funding jihadists in
Syria, but Bandar's bragadaccio that he controls the Caucasus
terrorists is absurd. Also, saying that Bandar got a Dagestan
militant to send his wife to be a suicide bomber in Volgograd just to
keep Bandar happy is really ridiculous. If Bandar even tried
something like that, Putin would retaliate, and it wouldn't be
pleasant. Bandar himself would be a dead man. These kinds of
terrorist attacks from Dagestan, Chechnya and Ingushetia happen all
the time since the Chechen war. Bandar can neither cause them nor
prevent them.

Granted --- However, wouldn't Russia and China like to end the petrodollar? And since governments are duplicitous how about a false flag event to justify an otherwise unjustifiable action?

For example -- a ridiculous possibility, --- Russia pushes the Saudi,. This hostility becomes well known. Even though Bandar can't control all of the terrorists during the Winter Olympics in Russia it is assumed he can ( he said so ) The terrorists make a real big mess of the Olympics. Russia blames the mess on Bandar because Bandar SAID HE COULD control the terrorists. Which then gives Russia justification to do something to the Saudi. And with Washington the way it is, Russia might pull it off and further weaken the dollar and US standing. Just saying. Oh and just think of the potential impact on the economies of some countries if Saudi oil does not flow DURING THE WINTER. Sounds like playing Russian roulette, the question is who is playing and how many bullets are in the chambers.

cheers

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2iaYY21uv
"Saudi Arabia severs diplomatic ties with the US over response to conflict in Syria" -- if true
And who is playing Russian roulette with whom?

And them there is ----------

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/10/ ... m-u-s.html

The REAL Reason for Saudi Arabia’s Shift Away from U.S.
China Has Just Surpassed the U.S. As World’s Largest Importer of Oil

Maybe there is a game of Russian roulette, but one in which the trigger is pulled by someone other than the holder of the gun.
Who would gain the most with the end of the petrodollar?

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Guest Post: The Growing Rift With Saudi Arabia Threatens To Severely Damage The Petrodollar http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-2 ... etrodollar

The number one American export is U.S. dollars.

and when this ends? ------------------------

Who is playing Russian roulette with whom? Who has the finger on the trigger?

Oh nice - sarcasm-

And one day the sheeple will wonder WTF happened!!!!!-- too late, sorry, something for nothing, you lose,too bad.