Generational theory, international history and current events
https://www.gdxforum.com/forum/
Cynic and his ilk are stupid. They would have us wait until it's too late. America has to be proactive if it is to survive what is coming.Tom Mazanec wrote:Cynic Hero 86
So what if they do not directly affect the USA? Should we wait until they do? China conquers Taiwan, no problem. China conquers Japan, no problem. China conquers Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, no problem. China conquers India, no problem. We wait until they take Hawaii to respond?
Without US guarantees, the moment China invades Taiwan is the Moment the Rest of Asia re-militarizes. Asia is demilitarized Today is Because the US is defending those countries For them. If the US tells them "you're on your own" demilitarization from that point forewards becomes a suicidal Policy. Boomers are imposing "blockers" on the natural flow of events. Also if China attacks India, they get nuked in response even without US involvement.Guest wrote:Cynic and his ilk are stupid. They would have us wait until it's too late. America has to be proactive if it is to survive what is coming.Tom Mazanec wrote:Cynic Hero 86
So what if they do not directly affect the USA? Should we wait until they do? China conquers Taiwan, no problem. China conquers Japan, no problem. China conquers Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, no problem. China conquers India, no problem. We wait until they take Hawaii to respond?
Shut up, lawn boy.Heisenberg wrote:.....Until it's notJCP wrote:It's always better where the Tories are.
Cynic Hero 86 wrote:Without US guarantees, the moment China invades Taiwan is the Moment the Rest of Asia re-militarizes. Asia is demilitarized Today is Because the US is defending those countries For them. If the US tells them "you're on your own" demilitarization from that point forewards becomes a suicidal Policy. Boomers are imposing "blockers" on the natural flow of events. Also if China attacks India, they get nuked in response even without US involvement.Guest wrote:Cynic and his ilk are stupid. They would have us wait until it's too late. America has to be proactive if it is to survive what is coming.Tom Mazanec wrote:Cynic Hero 86
So what if they do not directly affect the USA? Should we wait until they do? China conquers Taiwan, no problem. China conquers Japan, no problem. China conquers Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, no problem. China conquers India, no problem. We wait until they take Hawaii to respond?
But Most of them Don't have nukes and other WMDs, and that is the result of deliberate US policy.Guest wrote:Cynic Hero 86 wrote:Without US guarantees, the moment China invades Taiwan is the Moment the Rest of Asia re-militarizes. Asia is demilitarized Today is Because the US is defending those countries For them. If the US tells them "you're on your own" demilitarization from that point forewards becomes a suicidal Policy. Boomers are imposing "blockers" on the natural flow of events. Also if China attacks India, they get nuked in response even without US involvement.Guest wrote: Cynic and his ilk are stupid. They would have us wait until it's too late. America has to be proactive if it is to survive what is coming.
YOU KNOW NOTHING.
Asian countries are armed to the teeth. And they continue to upgrade their armed forces. Thailand has an aircraft carrier. So do the Koreans and and the Japanese. The most powerful navy in Asia (after America's) is Japan's. Asia is not Europe. The Europeans have slashed their defense budgets, ended conscription, and reduced the size of their armed forces. The state of many European armies is bad. Asian armed forces are continuously being upgraded (as much as their budgets will allow). Japan, SK, and a few other countries do look to America for help, but most don't. Does Vietnam really expect America to defend them?
I can't believe you keep writing such rubbish...
If Japan's navy is more powerful than China's -- and I assume that theGuest wrote: > YOU KNOW NOTHING.
> Asian countries are armed to the teeth. And they continue to
> upgrade their armed forces. Thailand has an aircraft carrier. So
> do the Koreans and and the Japanese. The most powerful navy in
> Asia (after America's) is Japan's. Asia is not Europe. The
> Europeans have slashed their defense budgets, ended conscription,
> and reduced the size of their armed forces. The state of many
> European armies is bad. Asian armed forces are continuously being
> upgraded (as much as their budgets will allow). Japan, SK, and a
> few other countries do look to America for help, but most
> don't. Does Vietnam really expect America to defend them?
> I can't believe you keep writing such rubbish...