21-Jul-18 World View -- The Trump-Putin private meeting was almost certainly about China

[John]

She's a Silent. You're an idiot.

[CH86]

She's a Silent. You're an idiot.

You are assuming that any enemy who goes to war with the US would be cowards afraid to fight other men. It's you guys who are underestimating the enemy as well as fundamentally misunderstanding how various adversaries societies and Militaries are configured. War with North Korea, has never mean't a North Korean invasion of North America, it is a potential Korean war II escalating into a larger war. Same goes for potential wars with China or Russia. They only way a large-scale invasion of North America would occur is if we had already Lost a larger world war and the enemies were closing in against a US that chose to fight to the bitter end. Red Dawn is a movie, it's assertions bear little to no resemblance to reality.

[Guest 2]

John,
What is a "Silent"?
I have been battling in Breitbart all day. Is "Silent" an upvote or downvote?
(So far I've not been banned today.)

[John]

John,
What is a "Silent"?
I have been battling in Breitbart all day. Is "Silent" an upvote or downvote?
(So far I've not been banned today.)

A Silent is a member of the Silent generation, born before 1942.

[Guest 2]

Gee. I've lived all these decades going against type. Lyle Schaller is a Methodist Church consultant and author. He once advised, "Never accept a generalization from a woman born in the 1930's". We matured on the wave of having to function against traditional gender type. Something bad happened in the 60's. Something bad that morphed into feminazis. I need to get a copy of your survival book, John. I have no understanding of today's females.

[John]

> Gee. I've lived all these decades going against type. Lyle
> Schaller is a Methodist Church consultant and author. He once
> advised, "Never accept a generalization from a woman born in the
> 1930's". We matured on the wave of having to function against
> traditional gender type. Something bad happened in the 60's.
> Something bad that morphed into feminazis. I need to get a copy
> of your survival book, John. I have no understanding of today's
> females.

Don't count on getting a survival book from someone who isn't
surviving.

[FishbellykanakaDude]

... I need to get a copy of your survival book, John. ....

Don't count on getting a survival book from someone who isn't
surviving.

You still seem to have survived to this point!

..since we all "don't survive" eventually, you're as "expert" as anyone else as to surviving. At least for now.

Should we "take advice" from you as a survivor? Depends on the advice.

So,.. carry on writing your "advice books" and "advice blog(s)", as it's not your job to decide if your advice is an aid to "survival" or not.

Your job is to get out of you what demands to get out of you as a survivor to this point, as you wont be able to do that once you're no longer a survivor.

..all "books" are survival "books", because they are an attempt to have "wisdom" survive into the future.

Just do your damned job, worker bee..<chuckle!>

[CH86]

She's a Silent. You're an idiot.

You are assuming that any enemy who goes to war with the US would be cowards afraid to fight other men. It's you guys who are underestimating the enemy as well as fundamentally misunderstanding how various adversaries societies and Militaries are configured. War with North Korea, has never mean't a North Korean invasion of North America, it is a potential Korean war II escalating into a larger war. Same goes for potential wars with China or Russia. They only way a large-scale invasion of North America would occur is if we had already Lost a larger world war and the enemies were closing in against a US that chose to fight to the bitter end. Red Dawn is a movie, it's assertions bear little to no resemblance to reality.

The reason the US military contingency plans for North Korea is that for a Korean War II with possible escalation via WMDs and not for a "Red Dawn" scenario of Kim invading the CONUS, is because the red dawn scenario is currently not a plausible one. A simple look at the North Korean Capabilities and the capabilities of the Individual branches of the NORKs army, shows they do not have the military capabilities to mount such an attack. North Korea is a threat, make no mistake, china is as well. But the "red dawn" scenario is not a plausible one based on their known military capabilities.

https://modernsurvivalonline.com/could- ... ly-happen/

[Guest 5]

Do you think Trump's opposition will be able to undermine him and impeach him? That would mean the destruction of America without a shot being fired. A democrat would give in completely to China and we would still end up getting nuked.

[CH86]

To clarify in war you are shooting and killing the enemy, and the enemy is shooting and killing you. In the case of China and NK when they talk of war they mean Chinese or North Korean troops targeting shooting American troops and Allied troops and vice-versa. Your assertions are going dangerously close to "yellow peril" tropes, where evil Asiatic enemies start a war not to seek victory or territory or even to win the war that was started but to carry out mass rapes, etc. on virtuous white women.

Also whatever strategies used in a war means the enemy has fair game to use the same tactics and strategies. Your proposed strategies would result in immediate US and Russian retaliation against the urban classes in China and NK. Now you can say that their regimes would callously sacrifice large chunks of their own people, yes they well. The problem here is that the CCP's power base and supporters are located in the cities of China. Likewise the North Korean Communist officials and Nomenklatura class is concentrated in Pyongyang and in the provincial capitals. The Rural Chinese and North Koreans are essentially serfs, they would NOT support the ruling governments in a war. Xi and Kim are NOT "leading back to the land" pro-rural movements in their countries, instead the rural populations are regarded by the ruling regimes as basically subhuman yokels, this also means they are expendable as cannon fodder. The Urban populations in China and NK are the ruling regimes base and biggest supporters. Your proposed strategy would be rejected by the CCP and NK leaderships for that reason. They would instead use their military in a clash vs the allied forces which adds potential loot and the capture of prestige targets, also such would kill off large numbers of young aggressive rural men, which would soldify the ruling governments in China and North Korea. Thus it would be the rural Chinese and Koreans who would be used as cannon fodder, while attempts would be made to keep urban Chinese and North Korean casualties at a minimum