As we warned:
Since 2012 a sophisticated but bizarre online neo-fascist movement has been growing fast. It's called "The Dark Enlightenment". Its modus operandi is well suited to a digital society. Supporters are dotted all over the world, connected via a handful of blogs and chat rooms. Its adherents are clever, angry white men patiently awaiting the collapse of civilisation, and a return to some kind of futuristic, ethno-centric feudalism, says Jamie Bartlett in this article, Meet The Dark Enlightenment: sophisticated neo-fascism that's spreading fast on the net, at The Telegraph.
Rule number 1 to parlance speak > Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule … Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Meanwhile:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/20 ... p-tax-rate
http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 970#p22154
http://woodpilereport.com/html/index-354.htm
We can underpin it with Klingberg and his cycle of political deviats. Doctor Quigley seen it early just saying.
Impossible to move the ball down the field now. Tactical consolidation as we warned from day one to preserve capital to avoid
the carnage of the FSA consuming fixed capital. The issue is not emerging markets but the parable of the four soils.
Dietrich was right.
As we already know the backlash is palatable and expected with the over then hill through the dale neocons. Note, I did not say defense realities.
We touched on this facet that the right walled themselves in and the moderate voice was persistent but actually appeared down
trodden. Any first year student is aware of Thucydides warning with moderates and the position they will find themselves in.