Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 5:16 pm
http://fofoa.blogspot.com/2010/07/debto ... avers.html
So just to repeat for clarity: Hard money regimes almost always end in bloodshed, when the easy money camp slaughters the hard money camp to avoid hard repayment terms. And easy money regimes almost always end in financial suffering when the easy money collapses. Here are a few more examples of "easy money collapses"...
Angola (1991-1999)
Argentina (1975-1991, 2001)
Austria (1921-1922)
Belarus (1994-2002)
Bolivia (1984-1986)
Brazil (1986-1994)
Bosnia-Herzegovina (1993)
Bulgaria (1991-1997)
Chile (1971-1973)
China (1939-1950)
Free City of Danzig (1923)
Ecuador (2000)
England (1560)
Greece (1944-1953)
Georgia (1995)
Germany (1923-1924, 1945-1948)
Greece (1944-1953)
Hungary (1922-1927, 1944-1946)
Israel (1979-1985)
Japan (1944-1948)
Krajina (1993)
Madagascar (2004)
Mexico (1993)
Mongolian Empire (13th and 14th Century AD)
Nicaragua (1987-1990)
Persian Empire (1294)
Peru (1984-1990)
Poland (1922-1924, 1990-1993)
Romania (2000-2005)
Ancient Rome (~270AD)
Russia (1921-1922, 1992-1994)
Taiwan (late-1940's)
Turkey (1990's)
Ukraine (1993-1995)
United States (1812-1814, 1861-1865)
Vietnam (1981-1988)
Yap (late 1800's)
Yugoslavia (1989-1994)
Zaire (1989-1996)
Zimbabwe (1999 - present)
Stupid paper monkeys, killing more stupid paper monkeys, killing more stupid paper monkeys.
Marx had it almost completely backwards when he said the rich exploit the poor for free income.
We must each understand the difference between choices and inevitabilities. What is coming at us is inevitable. It is unavoidable. How we personally prepare for it is a choice we each must actively make.
They already know what you will vote for. I will not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSJXle3LP_Q
http://www.khodorkovsky.com/
Now, personally, having seen what happened to another high-profile Russian billionaire who crossed the Kremlin, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was recently refused parole from his Siberian labor camp for allegedly hoarding lemons, we're skeptical that owning, say, the New Jersey Nets, will extend the life or freedom of a disloyal oligarch. But we suppose it's worth a try.
http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-bl ... z2zkTh804B
In our country (the former U.S.S.R.) the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the State. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
In the immortal words of former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, describing the country’s economic transition
of the 1990’s: “We hoped for the best, but things turned out as usual.”
"the intelligent will witness her quandary, the general public will not understand, and Congress will not care once November passes. m
Clarification starts with both governments adhering to the rule of law. Not going to happen.
Problem-Reaction-Solution
1963 Communist Goals, Because you’re now left with unproductive, state sponsored welfare recipients that don’t produce anything that you can’t steal from them but they keep you in office.
You need the hard working ox middle class to suck the blood from. When the ox makes a run for it, well, you have to find ways to stop that from happening.
These ambitious men were not naive; they were overconfident about their ability to manipulate and were hopelessly outplayed.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... y-clinton/
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF ECONOMIC CALCULATION UNDER SOCIALISM
“It is the two fundamental errors of mathematical economics that must be indicted. The mathematical economists are almost exclusively intent upon the study of what they call economic equilibrium and the static state. Recourse to the imaginary construction of an evenly rotating economy is, as has been pointed out, an indispensable mental tool of economic reasoning. But it is a grave mistake to consider this auxiliary tool as anything else than an imaginary construction”
He no longer deals with human action but with a soulless mechanism mysteriously actuated by forces not open to further analysis. In the imaginary construction of the evenly rotating economy there is, of course, no room for the entrepreneurial function. Thus the mathematical economist eliminates the entrepreneur from his thought. He has no need for this mover and shaker whose never ceasing intervention prevents the imaginary system from reaching the state of perfect equilibrium and static conditions. He hates the entrepreneur as a disturbing element. The prices of the factors of production, as the mathematical economist sees it, are determined by the intersection of two curves, not by human action. The problem of socialist economic calculation is precisely this: that in the absence of market prices for the factors of production, a computation of profit or loss is not feasible. Who should be master, the consumers or the director? With whom should the ultimate decision rest whether a concrete supply of factors of production should be employed for the production of the consumers good or the consumers good be? Such a question does not allow of any evasive answer.
washingscow Same animals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEClCAFjYHg
We think society are dumbed down but the actual science indicated they never had a chance.
We have much to glean from this bitter harvest and ashes.
The four soils is only the basic step.
So just to repeat for clarity: Hard money regimes almost always end in bloodshed, when the easy money camp slaughters the hard money camp to avoid hard repayment terms. And easy money regimes almost always end in financial suffering when the easy money collapses. Here are a few more examples of "easy money collapses"...
Angola (1991-1999)
Argentina (1975-1991, 2001)
Austria (1921-1922)
Belarus (1994-2002)
Bolivia (1984-1986)
Brazil (1986-1994)
Bosnia-Herzegovina (1993)
Bulgaria (1991-1997)
Chile (1971-1973)
China (1939-1950)
Free City of Danzig (1923)
Ecuador (2000)
England (1560)
Greece (1944-1953)
Georgia (1995)
Germany (1923-1924, 1945-1948)
Greece (1944-1953)
Hungary (1922-1927, 1944-1946)
Israel (1979-1985)
Japan (1944-1948)
Krajina (1993)
Madagascar (2004)
Mexico (1993)
Mongolian Empire (13th and 14th Century AD)
Nicaragua (1987-1990)
Persian Empire (1294)
Peru (1984-1990)
Poland (1922-1924, 1990-1993)
Romania (2000-2005)
Ancient Rome (~270AD)
Russia (1921-1922, 1992-1994)
Taiwan (late-1940's)
Turkey (1990's)
Ukraine (1993-1995)
United States (1812-1814, 1861-1865)
Vietnam (1981-1988)
Yap (late 1800's)
Yugoslavia (1989-1994)
Zaire (1989-1996)
Zimbabwe (1999 - present)
Stupid paper monkeys, killing more stupid paper monkeys, killing more stupid paper monkeys.
Marx had it almost completely backwards when he said the rich exploit the poor for free income.
We must each understand the difference between choices and inevitabilities. What is coming at us is inevitable. It is unavoidable. How we personally prepare for it is a choice we each must actively make.
They already know what you will vote for. I will not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSJXle3LP_Q
http://www.khodorkovsky.com/
Now, personally, having seen what happened to another high-profile Russian billionaire who crossed the Kremlin, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was recently refused parole from his Siberian labor camp for allegedly hoarding lemons, we're skeptical that owning, say, the New Jersey Nets, will extend the life or freedom of a disloyal oligarch. But we suppose it's worth a try.
http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-bl ... z2zkTh804B
In our country (the former U.S.S.R.) the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the State. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
In the immortal words of former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, describing the country’s economic transition
of the 1990’s: “We hoped for the best, but things turned out as usual.”
"the intelligent will witness her quandary, the general public will not understand, and Congress will not care once November passes. m
Clarification starts with both governments adhering to the rule of law. Not going to happen.
Problem-Reaction-Solution
1963 Communist Goals, Because you’re now left with unproductive, state sponsored welfare recipients that don’t produce anything that you can’t steal from them but they keep you in office.
You need the hard working ox middle class to suck the blood from. When the ox makes a run for it, well, you have to find ways to stop that from happening.
These ambitious men were not naive; they were overconfident about their ability to manipulate and were hopelessly outplayed.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... y-clinton/
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF ECONOMIC CALCULATION UNDER SOCIALISM
“It is the two fundamental errors of mathematical economics that must be indicted. The mathematical economists are almost exclusively intent upon the study of what they call economic equilibrium and the static state. Recourse to the imaginary construction of an evenly rotating economy is, as has been pointed out, an indispensable mental tool of economic reasoning. But it is a grave mistake to consider this auxiliary tool as anything else than an imaginary construction”
He no longer deals with human action but with a soulless mechanism mysteriously actuated by forces not open to further analysis. In the imaginary construction of the evenly rotating economy there is, of course, no room for the entrepreneurial function. Thus the mathematical economist eliminates the entrepreneur from his thought. He has no need for this mover and shaker whose never ceasing intervention prevents the imaginary system from reaching the state of perfect equilibrium and static conditions. He hates the entrepreneur as a disturbing element. The prices of the factors of production, as the mathematical economist sees it, are determined by the intersection of two curves, not by human action. The problem of socialist economic calculation is precisely this: that in the absence of market prices for the factors of production, a computation of profit or loss is not feasible. Who should be master, the consumers or the director? With whom should the ultimate decision rest whether a concrete supply of factors of production should be employed for the production of the consumers good or the consumers good be? Such a question does not allow of any evasive answer.
washingscow Same animals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEClCAFjYHg
We think society are dumbed down but the actual science indicated they never had a chance.
We have much to glean from this bitter harvest and ashes.
The four soils is only the basic step.