Re: Generational Dynamics World View News
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2022 9:41 am
A good source for latest in military is to go to the Brian Wang website Next Big Future and click the military tab.
Generational theory, international history and current events
https://www.gdxforum.com/forum/
A quick look at Swedish immigration shows them taking 110,000 people per year in a country with 10,350,000 population. We took 15,000 a year in 2021 in a nation of 329,500,000. Are you sure you advocate we become more like Sweden?
I was talking about electing right wing/populist governments.Bob Butler wrote: Fri Sep 16, 2022 10:08 amA quick look at Swedish immigration shows them taking 110,000 people per year in a country with 10,350,000 population. We took 15,000 a year in 2021 in a nation of 329,500,000. Are you sure you advocate we become more like Sweden?
15K? You're high. Maybe 15K per week, or month.Bob Butler wrote: Fri Sep 16, 2022 10:08 amA quick look at Swedish immigration shows them taking 110,000 people per year in a country with 10,350,000 population. We took 15,000 a year in 2021 in a nation of 329,500,000. Are you sure you advocate we become more like Sweden?
The 15K was the limit Trump set on legal immigration. If you include the illegals, sure, it gets higher.
If I'm supporting the will of the people checked by the rights of the individual, it is hard to argue against populist. Thing is, the right to chose is popular. Overturning Roe seems to have really mobilized women. The rights of minorities are popular. We're heading towards a majority of Americans being minority one way or another. Keeping the MAGA crowd is also questionable at this point. The alternative to populist is holding a violent insurrection on behalf of an autocrat periodically. And after cutting services for years, putting services back is making the Democrats popular. We'll have to see how it goes.
Xi seems to be dealing with a fight against tribal, religious or other cultures wishing to govern themselves rather than be controlled by a larger force. I would suggest Communism and Capitalism as the usual larger forces. If I were Russia or China, yes, borrowing the language of fighting terrorism would be useful. But it could also be viewed as a desire for independence and wishing to avoid bullies. Ukraine wishing to be free of Russian interest would be an example. Tribes wishing independence in the Middle East another. Taiwan and Hong Kong clinging to western values a third.FullMoon wrote: Fri Sep 16, 2022 2:02 pm https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-paci ... 022-09-16/
Securing the Heartland before taking on the Rimlands.
Jeez. That reads like it was written directly in the KremlinNoMansLand wrote: Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:35 am An interesting perspective on the current operations in Ukraine and possible plans to take advantage of the coming winter.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ ... me-changer
Given Putin's early brag about low casualties, I found this bit very interesting:
There were no Russian Armed Forces in those settlements: only Rosgvardia, and these are not trained to fight military forces. Kiev attacked with an advantage of around 5 to 1. The allied forces retreated to avoid encirclement. There are no Russian troop losses because there were no Russian troops in the region.
From your previous post it's going to come down to opinion and I'm not going to try changing your mind.Navigator wrote: Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:44 pm Here is more on the disastrous state of ammunition supply capacity for the USA:
https://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/supp ... -military/
As a result of Iraq and the Global War on Terror (GWOT), the defense industrial base in general, and the munitions industrial base in particular, is being challenged to meet current and future requirements. Post-Cold War downsizing, consolidation and disinvestment has left the Department of Defense (DoD) in many instances hard-pressed to meet the logistics and supply demands of the GWOT. The period from the end of the Cold War to the present [2004] saw a 68 percent reduction in the overall capacity of the munitions industrial base. Today, the United States has but a single government-owned production facility for small caliber ammunition, a plant that was opened during World War II [and BTW, still uses WW2 age machinery]. Despite recent increases, funding levels still are not adequate to address the full range of demands confronting the munitions industrial base, including replenishing diminished stockpiles, modernizing production capabilities, and simultaneously, preparing for a future of advanced weapons and munitions.
It is difficult to overemphasize the need for additional resources to support modernization of facilities and manufacturing equipment. The entire ammunition production capability of the United States depends on the availability of nitrocellulose, which in turn depends upon the continuing operation of an aging and technologically antiquated acid production facility at Radford Army Ammunition Plant. Should this single acid production facility be shut down, it could have serious consequences for the production of ammunition and, hence, for U.S. military operations worldwide. This acid plant is but one example of numerous single points of potential failure that exist throughout the munitions industrial base. The loss of production from any of these single points could shut down the production of numerous munitions.
See also this more recent article that implies that nothing has really been done to alleviate the problems discussed by the Lexington Institute articles above:
https://www.army.mil/article/249276/ame ... the_future