Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... ot-others/
COVID Vaccine Injuries Woke Up Some People — Why Not Others?

Some people injured by COVID-19 vaccines recognized what happened to them, accepted it, and joined the campaign for better research and vaccine safety. But others remain in the dark, despite dealing with sudden and ongoing mystery illnesses. Why?
As COVID-19 vaccine injuries started mounting up, and the topic became somewhat less taboo in the media — albeit always accompanied by boilerplate text about how the benefits outweigh the risks — some of us expressed hope that injured people would “wake up” to the risks of the shots, creating a wave of awareness and action.

Some vaccine-injured people recognized what happened to them, accepted it and joined the campaign for better research and vaccine safety. Yet, this has not uniformly been the case. A good many others remain in the dark, despite dealing with sudden and ongoing mystery illnesses.

These people grope for answers, pinning their symptoms on catch-all explanations like stress or long COVID (a more politically favorable diagnosis than post-vaccine syndrome), or awkwardly straddling the cognitive dissonance arising from the clash between medically recognized post-vaccine side effects and deeply held faith in the Saviour Vaccines.

Why do some vaccine-injured people accept what happened to them, but others don’t? Brendan and Michelle’s stories offer insight.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://www.aussie17.com/p/uks-4-times- ... al-trainer
UK's 4 Times Best Personal Trainer Makes a U-Turn on COVID Vaccines??
Mike Hind, the UK's 4X Best Personal Trainer and an MBE recipient, recently sparked a conversation on Facebook by sharing that he feels different after receiving the COVID vaccine.
Before the arrival of COVID, Mike considered himself a healthy and resilient individual. He rarely got sick, and when he did, he was quick to recover from injuries and illnesses, always bouncing back in no time.

Good morning guys…
I know this post will be controversial but I have to be real and honest in what I’m thinking and hear your thoughts.

Before Covid arrived, I considered myself a healthy, resilient person rarely ill, quick to recover from injuries, and always bouncing back pretty quick when I was ill..

However, since receiving the COVID vaccines, Mike has noticed significant and troubling changes in his health. When he falls ill now, he finds that the sickness feels much more severe. His body struggles to fight off illnesses, and recovering now seems to take much longer than it used to.

Since getting the Covid vaccines, I’ve noticed some serious changes.

When I do get ill, it feels much more severe, I can’t fight off the illness and it takes months to recover, and when I pick up injuries, recovery seems to take much so longer.

Mike then reflects on a recent operation he had, which he expected to heal from in 6 to 8 weeks. To his dismay, four months later, he is still not fully healed. During Christmas, he faced a serious health scare, as doctors diagnosed him with pneumonia. He experienced difficulty breathing and developed a chest infection, and even after four weeks, something still doesn’t feel right.

My operation I should have been recovered in 6/8 weeks, yet 4 month later I’m still not healed. At Christmas I was so ill, doctors told me it was pneumonia, I couldn’t breathe, I developed a chest infection and 4 weeks on I’m still not right.

Some have suggested that perhaps his age could be a factor. Yet, as the owner of a gym who works out every single day for over 12 years, he knows he leads a healthy, active lifestyle. His diet and routine are consistent; he eats the same foods daily and follows the same regimen, making his lifestyle predictably healthy.

Some have said is it my age?

I own a gym, I workout each and every day and have for over 12 years, my diet and routine never changes, I eat the same food everyday and I have the same routine… my lifestyle is so predictable.

He clarifies that he is not anti-vaccine. In fact, he’s uncertain whether these recent health changes are related to the vaccine itself, the effects of COVID, or if something entirely different is at play. This is the part that many people are unable to shake off because of "the science" that Fauci pushed.

I honestly don’t blame them. How many people understand DNA contamination, IgG4 elevation (I had to make a funny video to explain it), chronic inflammation due to cGAS-STING, prion-like sequences, and HIV glycoproteins embedded into the spike protein that is constantly manufactured by the body of the vaccinated?

Heck, even after working with the COVID vaccine manufacturers for 20 years, I am barely keeping up with it.

To be clear, I’m not anti-vaccine, and I’m not even sure if these changes are connected to the vaccine, the effects of Covid itself, or just something else? But 100% something has changed.

Contemplating whether he would make the same choice if given the chance to go back in time, he concludes that he personally would not. Please join me in welcoming Mike to the Aussie17’s U-Turn list.

I can’t help but feel different, and it’s something that’s been on my mind for a while, I had to be honest and share this because I was also honest when I had the 2 vaccines.

Would I have them again if I could go back in time? Honestly I don’t think I would personally. I know I’m not alone in this, as I’ve spoken to others who feel the same way.

Anyway, here is the full link to Mike Hind’s Facebook post from earlier this week
Image
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/can-yo ... ed-against
"Can Your Child be Injected Against Your Will?" w/ John Klar
Opinion - Dr. Naomi Wolf
"Dario and Shujen Politella visited their 6-year-old son's public school two days before a COVID-19 vaccination clinic was offered to ensure he would not be vaccinated. Despite assurances that he would be safe, their son was given a different child's name tag and was administered a shot, over his repeated protests. Vermont's Supreme Court has ruled that parents have no recourse for such violations except under the federal PREP Act and dismissed the Politellas' suit against the school. Attorney John Klar is representing the family in a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the SCOTUS, claiming this was an erroneous misapplication of federal law that violated numerous fundamental rights including the right to informed consent and parental rights. Mainstream media has misled American parents about this case, asserting that it will not permit public schools to jab children with impunity. Attorney Klar explains why that is misinformation. Dr. Wolf and Mr. Klar discuss other implications of this case for all Americans. The Politellas tell their own story here in a brief video."
https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/pro-v ... to-wake-up
Pro-Vaxxers Need to WAKE UP

How much longer will people believe the lies?
A new study by Anthony Mawson of Chalfont Research Institute, Jackson, Mississippi was published on Jan. 23, 2025, in the Journal of Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. The title of the study is nearly self-explanatory: Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid. The premise of the study is spelled out in the introduction of the abstract: (lightly edited):

Vaccinations required [in most states] for school attendance have increased nearly threefold since the 1950s, now targeting 17 infectious diseases. However, the impact of the expanded schedule on children’s overall health remains uncertain.

Preliminary studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children have reported that the vaccinated are significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to be diagnosed with bacterial infections, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).

The objective of this study was to determine the association between vaccination and NDDs in 9-year-old children enrolled in the Medicaid program. The specific aims were to test the hypothesis that: 1) vaccination is associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other NDDs; 2) preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of NDDs compared to preterm birth without vaccination; and 3) increasing numbers of vaccinations are associated with increased risks of ASD.

After analyzing the claims for 47,155 nine-year-old children, the findings were:

vaccination was associated with significantly increased odds of developing all measured NDDs;

among children born preterm and vaccinated, almost 40% were diagnosed with at least one NDD compared to 15.7% among unvaccinated preterm infants and

the relative risk of autism increased according to the number of visits that included vaccinations.

Children with just one vaccination visit were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with autism (ASD) than the unvaccinated. Those with 11 or more visits were 4.4 times more likely to have been diagnosed with autism than those with no visit for vaccination.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/babies ... -sponsored
"Babies Dying!" w/ Dr. Thorp [Sponsored]

Opinion - Dr. Naomi Wolf
"Dr. James Thorp’s recent interview has sparked widespread concern. In just one week of practice, he witnessed the deaths of three babies—a tragedy he hadn’t encountered in over 40 years as an OB/GYN. The deaths shared similar causes: placentas failing to grow and blood flowing incorrectly in the umbilical cord. All were cases involving vaccinated mothers.

Dr. Thorp, along with Dr. Cole, theorizes that the spike protein proliferates continuously in the uterus, while lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) degrade the placenta. To investigate these findings further, they aim to establish a new organization to test tissue samples and conduct studies to uncover the root causes of this alarming baby die-off. They estimate $250,000 is needed for the effort. A website will be shared soon for those who want to support this critical research. As Dr. Thorp emphasizes, this work is essential because mainstream science has largely avoided addressing these issues.

On a positive note, fewer than 1% of pregnant women are now receiving mRNA injections. Dr. Thorp, myself, and the @Bannons_WarRoom DailyClout Research Volunteers have been among the few voices raising the alarm about these risks. All of us have faced significant backlash for doing so. Despite this, we remain committed to protecting mothers and babies, even as horrifying challenges lie ahead, particularly for those vaccinated in 2021."
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/c ... has-raised
Comedian Andrew Schulz Has Raised Major Concerns About ‘Vaccines’ After Fauci ‘Took the Pardon’: ‘What’s in My Arm?!’

Comedian Andrew Schulz has raised major concerns about Covid “vaccines” after discovering former President Joe Biden gave a sweeping preemptive pardon to Dr. Anthony Fauci.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/g ... d-vaccines
German Researchers: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Deliver Deadly Toxins Directly into Vital Organs

A new peer-reviewed study has found that Covid mRNA “vaccines” deliver deadly toxic material directly into vital organs, including the heart.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/b ... overnments
Breaking: Emails Reveal Government’s Failure to Monitor COVID Vaccine Injuries

In a stunning revelation, newly released emails from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have exposed critical failures in the government’s monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine injuries.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science
Dr. Judy Mikovits is a modern-day Rosalind Franklin, a brilliant researcher shaking up the old boys’ club of science with her groundbreaking discoveries. And like many women who have trespassed into the world of men, she uncovered decades-old secrets that many would prefer to stay buried.
What I Really Think about HIV and Ebola

The first concept I want you to understand is called zoonosis, or
more properly, zoonotic diseases. If you think it’s a funny word
and you immediately imagined a picture of a zoo, you wouldn’t be
far off. Zoonosis literally means a disease which can spread between
animals and humans.

It may surprise you given my reputation as a renegade, but I
believe the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) can occasionally
provide good, basic information to the public. Here is what they
have on their website about zoonotic diseases.

Every year, tens of thousands of Americans will get sick
from diseases spread between animals and people. These are known as
zoonotic diseases. Zoonotic means infectious diseases that are
spread between animals and people. Because these diseases cause
sickness or death in people, CDC is always tracking them.

Animals provide many benefits to people. Many people
interact with animals in their daily lives, both at home and away
from home. Pets offer companionship and entertainment, with millions
of households having one or more pets . . .

However, some animals can carry harmful genes that can
be shared with people and cause illness—these are known as
zoonotic diseases or zoonoses. Zoonotic diseases are caused by
harmful germs like viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi. These
germs can cause many different types of illnesses in people and
animals ranging from mild to serious illness to death. Some animals
can appear healthy even when they are carrying germs that can make
people sick.

And the biggest zoonotic disease that is not covered in that list
is HIV-AIDS, which affected more than sixty million people leading
to our world’s greatest modern plague. While a good deal of ink
has been dedicated to the question of how prejudice against the gay
lifestyle delayed efforts to properly address the disease, our job
as scientists is to provide an explanation of events in the past and
how problems might be avoided in the future.

Let’s make sure we understand our terms. The human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is linked to the condition known as
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). There was a brief time
when the disease was known as gay-related immune disease (GRID), and
many activists claim the name change to AIDS prompted a more
balanced examination of the disease. Perhaps this is true.

But what of the genesis of the retrovirus HIV? Where did it come
from?

We have a clear answer.

It came from a primate. The field agrees the precursor to HIV was
the simian immunodeficiency virus or SIV.

To be more precise, the human virus came from a monkey or
chimpanzee virus.
What we were told at the time was that the disease probably
jumped to humans as a result of Africans forgetting how to cook
their food, in this case chimpanzees, often referred to as “bush
meat,” and that the promiscuous sexual lifestyles of African
peoples (with implications of possible bestiality with primates) led
to the cross-species jump and spread of the virus among the human
population. I am now appalled that at the time we did not more
closely question these assumptions.

Since that time, there have been two competing and, in my mind,
closely related theories of how a chimpanzee retrovirus made the
jump to humans.

The first was popularized by the journalist Edward Hooper and
expanded upon in his lengthy 1999 book, The River: A Journey to the
Source of HIV and AIDS, for which he conducted more than six hundred
interviews. Of the interviews conducted, Hooper was most impressed
with evolutionary biologist Bill Hamilton, who, along with other
independent researchers such as Louis Pascal, Tom Curtis, and Blaine
Elswood, was proposing an idea that, before my work with XMRV, I
would have found quite radical. They proposed that the jump from
chimpanzees to humans came as a result of vaccine trials in the
Belgian Congo from 1957 to 1960 in which more than five hundred
common chimpanzees and bonobos (pygmy chimpanzees) were killed so
that their kidney cells and sera could be used to grow the oral
polio vaccine. This vaccine was subsequently administered to more
than a million Africans during that time period.

Hooper suggests there was great resistance to this idea, since
even in the late 1950s and early 1960s there was little public
support for the idea of using chimpanzees in such medical
experiments. In addition, the Belgian royal family was publicly
supporting the idea of wildlife conservation, and the revelation of
these actions would go against that image. Hooper believes another
reason for resistance to his idea is that if his theory was
accepted, it would shake public confidence in the medical
establishment as well as lead to multibillion-dollar class action
lawsuits for the AIDS epidemic.

This is what Edward Hooper has written on his website about the
circumstances surrounding the creation of HIV-AIDS from these
experiments and why it makes more sense than the competing bush-meat
and “cut hunter” theory.

By contrast, the oral polio vaccine (OPV) theory proposes that an experimental OPV that
had been locally prepared in chimpanzee cells and administered by
mouth, or “fed,” to nearly one million Africans in vaccine
trials staged in the then Belgian-ruled territories of the Belgian
Congo and Ruanda-Urundi between 1957 and 1960, represents the origin
of the AIDS pandemic. It provides a historically-supported
background: that between 1956 and 1959 over 500 common chimpanzees
(Pan troglodytes schweinfurthi and Pan troglodytes troglodytes) and
bonobos or pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) were housed together at
Lindi Camp (Near Stanleyville in the Belgian Congo, or DRC).

Hooper goes on to explain that the use of chimpanzees was not
technically prohibited by any conventions, but that in most
countries around the world at the time, Asian macaques were used in
polio virus preparation. As for the claim of other outbreaks, Hooper
believes they fit comfortably within the bounds of his theory:</p>
<blockquote><a name="calibre_link-251"></a>The OPV theory ascribes
the minor outbreaks of AIDS caused by other variants of HIV-1 (Group
O, Group N and the more controversial “Group P”) to other polio
vaccines (both oral and injected) that were prepared in the cells of
chimpanzees and administered in French Equatorial Africa (including
Congo Brazzaville and Gabon) in the same late fifties period. It
ascribes the outbreak of AIDS from HIV-2 (of which it maintains that
only two were epidemic outbreaks) to other polio vaccines (both oral
and injected) that were prepared in the cells of sooty mangabeys (or
other monkeys that had been caged with sooty mangabeys) and
administered in French West Africa in 1956–1960. All the other
HIV-2 groups that are claimed by bush-meat theorists have infected
just a single person, and some OPV theory supporters argue that
dead-end, non-transmissible infections such as these are the natural
fate of SIVs that infect human beings via the bushmeat route: that
unless they are introduced in an artificial manner (as via a
vaccine), they simply die out.

I find myself in complete agreement with Hooper’s analysis.
Yes, viruses can jump from one species to another, possibly by the
eating of an infected animal. But the natural process of degradation
by the digestive system, as well as cooking (even when poorly done)
is likely to inactivate most pathogens.
The second plausible theory, which has come to be known as the
“bush-meat” theory, is that sometime early in the twentieth
century an individual became infected with SIV from handling
chimpanzees or chimpanzee bush-meat. It usually involves the actions
of some anonymous native hunter (often called the “cut hunter”
because he cut himself shortly after having killed a chimpanzee).
Added to this scenario is urbanization encroaching upon the jungle,
allowing it to be spread by those newly introduced western evils of
prostitution and intravenous drug usage.

This theory has recently been expanded by the science writer
David Quammen in The Chimp and the River: How AIDS Emerged from an
African Forest. Based on an extrapolation of some scientific data,
Quammen sets the date for this viral transfer from chimp to human
around 1908 in the area known as Leopoldville (later Kinshasa) in
the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The description is vivid, and
plausible, but I question much about it:

Let’s give him due stature: not just a cut hunter but
the Cut Hunter. Assuming he lived hereabouts in the first decade of
the twentieth century, he probably captured his chimpanzee with a
snare made from a forest vine, or in some other form of a trap, and
then killed the animal with a spear. He may have been a Baka Pygmy
man, living independently with his extended family in the forest or
functioning as sort of a serf under the “protection” of a Bantu
village chief . . . There’s no way of establishing his identity,
nor even his ethnicity, but this remote southeastern corner of what
was then Germany’s Kamerun colony offered plenty of candidates . .

The chimp too, tethered by a foot or a hand, would have
been terrified as the man approached, but also angry and strong and
dangerous. Maybe the man killed it without getting hurt; if so, he
was lucky. Maybe there was an ugly fight; he might even have been
pummeled by the chimp, or badly bitten. But he won. Then he would
have butchered his prey, probably on the spot . . .

I imagine him opening a
long, sudden slice across the back of his left hand, into the
muscular web between thumb and forefinger, his flesh smiling out
pink and raw almost before he saw the damage or felt it, because his
blade was so sharp . . . His blood flowed out and mingled with the
chimp’s, the chimp’s flowed in and mingled with his, so that he
couldn’t quite tell which was which. He was up to his elbows in
gore. He wiped his hand. Blood leaked again into his cut, dribbled
again into it from the chimp, and again he wiped. He had no way of
knowing, no language or words or thoughts by which to conceive, that
this animal was SIV-positive. The idea didn’t exist in 1908.
It’s a possible scenario. I can’t say something like that didn’t happen. I just wonder why
it hadn’t happened many centuries earlier. Africans had been
hunting chimpanzees for thousands of years and cooking them. An
interesting addition Quammen makes to the theory is that
subsequently the virus spreads slowly among the population. But then
starting in 1917, there were vaccination campaigns against sleeping
sickness by European doctors who used glass syringes that were
reusable. One French colonial doctor during a two-year period
treated more than five thousand cases with only six syringes.

These campaigns peaked in the early 1950s, and by that time the
precursor to the deadly strain of HIV had arisen.

When you think about it, you come to the realization there’s a
battle of narratives, with science having a definite preference for
one over the other.

In the first scenario, unwitting scientists release a plague of
massive proportions on the population because of their use of
questionable animal experiments, infecting more than sixty million
people and causing the death of at least thirty-nine million.

In the second scenario, a chance event in a jungle encounter with
an infected chimpanzee leads to cross-species transmission, then
because it’s always a good play to blame urbanization and
prostitution, as well as maybe a little inadvertent help from
western medicine, and you have a new disease!

Is it any surprise that scientists far prefer scenario number
two?

While I can’t come to a definitive conclusion as to which
scenario is more likely, the first one, in which chimpanzees are
directly harvested for their organs and the growing of polio virus,
makes the most sense to me. It doesn’t have as many moving parts.

The virus is in a certain percentage of the five hundred
chimpanzees sacrificed. They’re cut up, then used to grow polio
vaccine, which is then given orally to nearly a million Africans.
And there’s another part of the story that makes Hooper’s
account sound more plausible.

After Hooper made his claim that the oral polio vaccine grown in
chimpanzee tissue and given to humans was the source of the HIV-AIDS
epidemic, there was an “investigation.” As I read Hooper’s
account, it sounded a lot like the Ian Lipkin investigation into
XMRV.

In this great investigation, they sampled stocks of polio vaccine
from the 1957–1960 period for traces of chimpanzee DNA, or simian
virus. Lo and behold, they found NOTHING!

There’s just one problem. All of the samples they used were
from the United States.

They did not have any samples of polio vaccine from Africa. The
samples of polio vaccine from the United States had never used
chimpanzee tissues as a growth medium or cell line.</p>
<p>They DID NOT test African samples of the oral polio vaccine for
that which used chimpanzee tissue.

This is what Hooper wrote about the supposed investigation into
the use of chimpanzee tissue in the development of the polio vaccine
that was performed by the Royal Society in September of 2000:</p>

Instead of the open and honest debate, and the
even-handed investigation of the OPV theory, which had been
promised, what actually took place was a carefully-planned attempt
to suppress the theory by fair means or foul. The conference became
focused around the testing of samples of CHAT vaccine which the
parent institute (The Wistar in Philadelphia) had finally released
for independent analysis. The vaccinators and the meeting organizers
insisted that the vaccine samples were representative of the batches
which had been prepared for use in Africa. Since they tested
negative for HIV, SIV, and chimpanzee DNA, they concluded that the
OPV hypothesis had been disproved— and an acquiescent press
largely concurred.

The reality, however, was very different. None of the
tested samples had ever been near Africa, let alone prepared for the
African trials.
As the weeks and months
passed after the meeting, it became clear that a carefully-organized
whitewash was being carried out, partly by the original protagonists
(who had, among other things, leant on witnesses to change key parts
of their stories), and partly by well-meaning research scientists
who could not countenance the possibility that their work of the
last ten years might be erroneous, and who secondly were unwilling
or unable to imagine that their peers might not be telling the
truth.

I’ve never met Edward Hooper, but he was writing this in 2004,
years before I ever pursued a similar line of inquiry. I’m sure he
must have undergone a similar evolution, from hopeful questioner to
disillusioned critic. Is it so difficult to imagine that members of
an organization will not believe the worst about their own members?
Don’t we see the same pattern among police, members of the clergy,
and our political class? Isn’t it the rare member of an
organization who sees the flaws of their own group?</p>
<p>We leave scientists alone in their research and practice,
expecting somehow that they can self-police. But we do not even
allow the police to self-police. There are citizen review boards,
internal affairs, and oversight committees.

In a similar manner, we have learned through bitter experience
that just because a person is a member of the clergy doesn’t mean
they are not capable of crimes against children. We are also
beginning to understand that these crimes are not just committed
against the flock, but there are more nuns and sisters in the
Catholic Church who are coming forward with stories of rape and
sexual assault committed by the male members of the clergy. These
stories sicken us, but perhaps we have simply trusted too much in
unaccountable authorities.

Now, maybe Hooper is wrong about his accusation, but it sounds
like a pretty serious charge to make. Given what I observed in the
“official” investigation into XMRV and the way they cavalierly
rewrote basic principles of virology, I’m more inclined to believe
Hooper’s account. The scientific establishment tells their stories
and expects we will believe them.

The simian virus gets transferred into humans, and then the
question becomes one of immune activation. What happened in the gay
community in the late 1970s and early 1980s?

There was a great deal of recreational drug usage, and it’s a
scientific fact that anal sex, with its subsequent tearing of
tissue, promotes immune activation. The sexual revolution for the
heterosexual population, and the lesbian population as well, did not
involve such risks.

Are dangers to the human population limited to the use of
chimpanzee tissue in the development of medical products, or is it a
more general question of any animal tissue? I tend to believe the
latter and use as an example the controversy over Simian Virus-40
(SV-40) in the same antipolio campaign of the 1950s and 1960s. The
concern is that these viruses may lie dormant in people until some
form of immune stimulation, just as we saw with HIV and the gay
lifestyle that included multiple partners, sexual activity that
involved anal tearing, and high recreational drug usage.

In her Pulitzer Prize-nominated book, The Pentagon’s Brain,
detailing the work of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), author Annie Jacobsen provides a brief overview of this
controversy. One of the DARPA scientists she interviewed for the
book was microbiologist Stephen Block, and this is what she wrote:

If the notion of a
stealth virus, or silent load, sounded improbable, Block cited a
little-known controversy involving the anti-polio vaccination
campaign of the late 1950s and early 1960s. According to Block,
during this effort millions of Americans risked contracting the
“cryptic human infection” of monkey virus, without ever being
told. “These vaccines,” writes Block, “were prepared using
live African green monkey kidney cells, and batches became
contaminated by low levels of a monkey virus, Simian virus 40 (SV
40), which eluded the quality control procedures of the day. As a
result, large numbers of people—probably millions in fact—were
inadvertently exposed to SV 40.”

The controversy over SV 40 was whether it would ultimately lead
to cancers in humans decades later. The virus would often be found
in cancerous tissues, raising the question of whether it was simply
a passenger or a causative agent. Again, this is the same concern
raised by the finding of bovine leukemia virus in samples of breast
cancer tissue and whether the use of growth hormone in the cattle
was prompting the expression of this virus. It’s also worth noting
that essentially zero testing is done these days of animal viruses
contaminating our vaccines or other medical products. Our medical
authorities simply assume we’re all tough enough to fight off
these contaminating viruses. Jacobsen continues:

Block says that two
outcomes of this medical disaster remain debated. One side says the
98 million people vaccinated dodged a bullet. The other side
believes there is evidence the vaccine did harm. “A great deal of
speculation occurs about whether [simian virus] may be responsible
for some diseases” that manifests much later in the vaccinated
person’s life, says Block, including cancer.

Let’s go to the doubters who agree that at least ninety-eight
million people were inoculated with a polio virus that was
contaminated with SV-40. Is it reasonable to assume that if you fire
ninety-eight million bullets, none will cause any harm?

And this only considers the polio vaccine. Every vaccine has been
grown in animal tissue, usually of several different species,
including monkey, mouse, bird, and cow. Each one of these
cross-species events has the potential to transfer a pathogen to
humans, or to create some new strain that can cause harm. We have
fired several billion bullets of biological ammunition at the human
species, and it is the height of arrogance to believe we have caused
zero damage.

In my discussion of Ebola, I want to highlight an idea many
others have been discussing in recent years in one form or another,
but that is likely to reconfigure how we go about promoting health.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/k ... zi-exposes
'KILL SHOT': Dr. Mark Trozzi Exposes mRNA Vaccines as a Genetically Engineered Bioweapon and Reveals Groundbreaking Recovery Solutions

“The spike protein encoded by mRNA vaccines is a genetically engineered bioweapon, designed to infiltrate and damage critical organs across the body.” – Dr. Mark Trozzi
“The spike protein encoded by mRNA vaccines is a genetically engineered bioweapon, designed to infiltrate and damage critical organs across the body.” – Dr. Mark Trozzi

Dr. Mark Trozzi recently delivered a compelling and meticulously detailed presentation on the significant health risks posed by mRNA vaccines, along with practical solutions for those affected by potential adverse effects.

With decades of experience in emergency medicine and a deep commitment to vaccine safety research, Dr. Trozzi offered a thorough, evidence-based analysis of the mechanisms underlying vaccine-related injuries. His presentation also provided actionable strategies to support recovery and improve health outcomes.

Structured into four key sections, this comprehensive discussion explored the dangers of the spike protein, the hidden risks of nanoparticles, the impact of immune system dysfunction, and science-backed approaches to treatment and recovery.

Part I: The Spike Protein and Its Implications
Dr. Trozzi began by dissecting the central role of the spike protein in both SARS-CoV-2 and mRNA vaccines. He described how these vaccines use lipid nanoparticles to deliver modified mRNA into human cells, instructing the body to produce spike proteins. This process, while intended to stimulate immunity, has led to widespread and unintended consequences.

Weaponization of the Spike Protein: Dr. Trozzi revealed that the spike protein encoded in the vaccines has been genetically engineered to include harmful modifications, such as a furin cleavage site, which increases toxicity, and the removal of hemagglutinin esterase, which naturally counteracts clot formation. These modifications make the spike protein more dangerous than its natural counterpart.

Translation Errors and Contaminants: The modified mRNA in these vaccines is prone to translation errors, leading to the production of random protein fragments that can trigger autoimmune diseases. Additionally, independent research has uncovered contaminants, including plasmid DNA fragments and SV40 promoter sequences, which are known to facilitate the integration of foreign genetic material into human cells. These contaminants raise serious concerns about manufacturing quality and long-term safety.

Systemic Damage: Unlike traditional vaccines, which target specific areas of the body, the lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines allow spike proteins to spread to critical organs, including the brain, heart, ovaries, and testes. This widespread distribution amplifies the potential for harm, contributing to conditions such as myocarditis, reproductive health issues, and neurological disorders.


Part II: Nanoparticles and Their Hidden Dangers
The presentation’s second section focused on the systemic risks posed by lipid nanoparticles and other vaccine components.

Tissue Penetration: Dr. Trozzi explained how lipid nanoparticles are designed to cross natural barriers in the body, such as the blood-brain barrier, allowing mRNA and spike proteins to infiltrate sensitive tissues. Repeated exposure through booster shots compounds this risk, leading to increased inflammation and organ damage.

Polyethylene Glycol (PEG): PEG, a stabilizing agent in the vaccines, can cause immune reactions in up to 70% of recipients. These reactions range from mild symptoms to severe allergic responses, including anaphylaxis.

Spike Protein Toxicity: Unlike natural infections, which primarily affect the respiratory tract, mRNA vaccines cause spike protein production throughout the body. These proteins bind to ACE2 receptors, facilitating cellular infiltration and triggering blood clotting, inflammation, and organ damage.


Part III: Immune Dysfunction and Long-Term Risks
In this section, Dr. Trozzi explored how mRNA vaccines disrupt the immune system, leading to a cascade of health issues.

Autoimmune Disorders: The spike protein’s structural similarity to human proteins, such as syncytin-1 (essential for placental development), can provoke immune attacks on the body’s own tissues. This phenomenon has been linked to autoimmune diseases like lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, and fertility problems.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE): Dr. Trozzi highlighted the risks of ADE, where vaccine-induced antibodies enhance viral infection rather than neutralizing it. He cited pre-COVID animal studies where similar vaccines exacerbated disease severity, often with fatal outcomes. Recent clinical data supports these concerns, showing increased COVID-19 infection rates among heavily vaccinated individuals.

Vaccine-Induced AIDS (VAIDS): Dr. Trozzi introduced the concept of VAIDS, where prolonged spike protein production depletes critical immune cells (CD4 and CD8 T-cells), leaving individuals vulnerable to infections, cancers, and other diseases. He linked this immune suppression to the rise of “turbo cancers,” aggressive malignancies that develop rapidly in vaccinated individuals.

Autopsy Findings: Suppressed autopsy data from Germany revealed extensive blood clotting in small blood vessels and spike protein infiltration in multiple organs. Embalmers have also reported finding unusual, rubbery blood clots in deceased individuals, further underscoring the systemic impact of the spike protein.


Part IV: Treatment and Recovery
Dr. Trozzi concluded with practical strategies to mitigate the effects of mRNA vaccines and support recovery. He emphasized the importance of both natural and medical interventions.

Enhancing Autophagy: Autophagy, the body’s process of clearing damaged cells and proteins, can be stimulated through:

Intermittent Fasting: Restricting food intake to a 6-8 hour window daily.

Extended Water Fasts: Periodic 3-day water fasts to boost cellular cleanup and regeneration.

Key Supplements:

Natokinase: An enzyme derived from fermented soybeans, effective in breaking down blood clots and degrading spike proteins.

Bromelain: Found in pineapples, this enzyme reduces inflammation and targets amyloid structures linked to spike proteins.

N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): An antioxidant that blocks spike protein binding and reduces oxidative stress.

Curcumin: The active compound in turmeric, enhanced with black pepper extract (piperine) for greater efficacy.

Repurposed Medications:

Ivermectin: Binds to spike proteins and neutralizes their effects.

Hydroxychloroquine: Facilitates zinc entry into cells, inhibiting viral replication and modulating immune responses.

Holistic Health Principles: Dr. Trozzi recommended a “NEW START” approach:

Nutrition: Emphasizing organic, nutrient-dense foods.

Exercise: Promoting regular physical activity.

Water: Staying hydrated with clean, fluoride-free water.

Sunshine: Ensuring adequate vitamin D levels.

Temperance: Avoiding excessive alcohol, smoking, and other harmful habits.

Air: Benefiting from fresh, outdoor environments.

Rest: Prioritizing quality sleep.

Trust in God or Spirituality: Reducing stress and cortisol levels through faith or mindfulness.


A Call for Accountability and Action
Dr. Trozzi’s presentation called for immediate action to address the widespread harm caused by mRNA vaccines. He urged governments and health institutions to:

Halt the production and distribution of these vaccines.

Reinstate silenced healthcare professionals who questioned their safety.

Conduct open, transparent investigations into the long-term effects of these injections.

This detailed and well-supported presentation shines a light on critical public health concerns while offering hope through actionable recovery strategies. Dr. Trozzi’s work underscores the need for independent research, accountability, and a renewed focus on patient-centered care.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/ ... -finds-5f1
BREAKING - Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Irrefutable Evidence Supporting Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 "Vaccines"

Over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for urgent action.
Abstract: COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm. More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. As of September 6, 2024, the CDC has documented 19,028 deaths in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by healthcare professionals or pharmaceutical companies who believe the product is related to the death. The total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS (37,544 among all participating countries) have far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%. The criteria for an FDA Class I recall, which applies to products with a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death, have been far exceeded. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, widespread DNA contamination, and a lack of demonstrated reduction in transmission, hospitalization, or mortality have undermined the rationale for continued administration. These unified requests for regulatory action underscore substantial shortcomings in data safety monitoring and risk mitigation. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure next steps are taken for accountability of the harm incurred.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

At a different part of the generational cycle, individuals and institutions are competent and function as they should.

In 1976 the United States was not in a crisis era.

https://www.nytimes.com/1976/10/13/arch ... shots.html
SWINE FLU PROGRAM IS HALTED IN 9 STATES AS 3 DIE AFTER SHOTS
WASHINGTON, Oct. 12—Swine flu vaccination programs in nine states and in Pittsburgh and its suburbs were suspended today, two weeks after they began nationally, after the deaths of three elderly persons who received the vaccine yesterday at a clinic in Pittsburgh.

Federal and Pennsylvania health on cials said there was no evidence that the deaths had resulted from the vaccinations. But they also said that the highly unusual circumstances of three fatalities among the patients of one clinic in such a short time required investigation.

All three patients are known to have had heart disease, health officials said. and autopsies showed that two died of heart attacks. The family of ‘ the third patient did not permit an autopsy.

After the deaths, swine flu immuni,alions were halted throughout Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh, and the Federal Center for Disease Control sent doctors to investigate.

No Evidence Shots Caused Them

At a news conference at the agency's headquarters in Atlanta, Dr. David J. Sencer, director of the center, said there was no evidence to suggest that the deaths had been caused by the vaccinations. Further, he said he knew of no reason for other communities to suspend their programs.

In nine states, however, health officials shut down swine flu vaccination programs until information about the Pittsburgh deaths could be clarified. These are Maine, Vermont, Illinois, Wisconsin, Virginia, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico and Alaska.

The New York City health authorities, meanwhile, pressed ahead with the immunization program, as did those in New Jersey and Connecticut. But New York State officials asked upstate areas to delay using any of the vaccine from the batch used in Pittsburgh. [Page 53].

Directives similar to that issued by New York State were announced by the health authorities in Michigan, Massachusetts, Utah and Florida.

The Philadelphia County authorities said they, too, would postpone further use of vaccine from the batch involved in the Pittsburgh deaths, but in the rest. of Pennsylvania state health officials said the immunization program would go on.

The three patients who died received vaccine in batch No. 913339A manufactured by Parke Davis & Company, one of four makers of the drug. The lot totals about 1.5 million doses and has been distributed throughout the East Coast, Dr. Sencer said.

At his news conference, Dr. Sencer said that besides, the investigations in Pittsburgh, samples of the vaccine were being sent to the Food and Drug Administration's Bureau of Biologics near Washington for testing.

Today, doctors checked by telephone with 100 other persons in Pittsburgh who had received vaccine from the same lot in the same clinic as the three who died and they found no adverse reactions. A substantial number of persons who had received vaccine from another lot were also surveyed with the same result, according to an official of the disease control center.’

Heart Disease Heightens Risk

Noting that the persons who died were all elderly, Dr. Sencer said it could be estimated that among 100.000 people in the 65‐to‐75 age group, there would be nine or ten deaths in any 24‐hour period and that this natural risk of death would be heightened by the existence of heart disease.

Dr. Sencer said the Allegheny County Health Department last Thursday started giving vaccine to the elderly and others classified in the “high risk” category because of chronic disease and that 23,000 shots had been given through yesterday.

The vaccine in question is called bivalent. It is designed to protect against both swine flu and the flu virus called A‐Victoria that was widespread in the United States last winter. For persons in the general population a monovalent vaccine protective only against swine flu is being administered in the national program that began Oct. 1 after many delays.

The three who died hours after receiving the vaccine in Pittsburgh were identified as Charles Gabig, 71 years old; Julia Bucci, 75, and Ella Michael, 74.

While Pittsburgh and its suburbs in Allegheny County suspended their vaccination program, Dr. Leonard Bachman, the Pennsylvania Health Secretary, said at a news conference in Harrisburg that the vaccination effort would continue in the state generally. He said no connection had been found between the vaccine and the deaths and that it would be bad judgment to postpone or cancel the overall program, considering that the 1976‐77 flu season may be nearing.

After Fort Dix Outbreak

The flu season generally begins late in the fall—November or December—but first widespread appearance of the disease may vary considerably from year to year.

The national program against swine flu was organized because of an outbreak early this year at Fort Dix, N.J. The effort has been plagued by controversies, delays and at least one manufacturing error.

Man Dies in Florida

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla., Oct. 12 (UPI) —A 63‐year‐old man died of a heart attack today about 90 minutes after receiving a swine flue inoculation from the same lot of vaccine used in Pittsburgh. He was identified as Saul Gelman of Sunrise, a community west of here.

Dr. Paul Hughes, director of the Broward County Health Department, said he doubted that Mr. Gelman's death was vaccine related. He said the death was the only case reported among more than 10,000 persons already given swine flu innoculations in the county.

2 Die in Oklahoma

OKLAHOMA CITY, Oct. 11 (UPI)—Two elderly persons have died after receiving swine flu shots in Oklahoma County, but the director of the city‐county health department said today there was no apparent relation between the shots and the deaths. A state health department spokesman said it was coincidence that the deaths came after the shots.

“Both were people who had bad hearts and had been under treatment for a long time. There's no connection between swine flu and the fact that they died, as far as anyone can tell,” Dr. Robert C. Bowers, Oklahoma CityCounty Health Department director, said.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

Ed Dowd said if the Trump Administration does not pull the mRNA injections from the market, we can expect "business as usual".

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/th ... t-vaccines
The ABV Strategy = Anything But Vaccines

Propaganda explained
Brief points from this clip:

They will tell you anything causes cancer. They will put proposition 65 notices on just about anything including Starbucks cups and say it's known to cause cancer. They already banned smoking, so they can't pin it on smoking anymore. So they go after food. All of this is BS and distraction into “toxic everything”, Wi-Fi and 5G and nanobots and chemtrails, and let's ban everything in agriculture so we can't grow anything anymore. But nothing about vaccines in that MAHA policy at all.

Calley and Casey Means came up with this policy (and likely were instructed by their father, Grady Means). Calley Means claimed that he convinced RFK Jr. to join Trump's campaign.
It’s going to be a shit show, I can feel it already. I worry that the anti-vaccine message that we all thought RFK Jr was going to carry has been already defeated by the owners of the Trump administration. I don’t know what will transpire, but I can tell you one thing for sure - professional propagandists are psychopaths (master manipulators) and they are not stupid. They will stop at nothing, defending the innermost-sacred-to-them-castle, the cult of “infectious disease prevention” by which they control the bodies of their slaves via forced poisoned needles. They are not only going to shout “safe and effective” from the main street media bullhorns, but they have also captured most of the “alternative” space via advertisers, sponsorships and just plain business opportunity to grow large media following. Once you know what to look for in the messaging, you can see it easily.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests