Religion and Vaccine Arguments

As requested, this sub-forum is for partying, fun, gossip, conundrums, flirting, comedy, tragedy, or whatever.
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/345-i ... l-vaccines
345. IT IS HARD TO GROK* HOW EVIL VACCINES ARE

*Robert Heinlein's word for complete understanding. For example, if you use the phrase, "vaccine hesitancy," you do not grok that every vaccine is Russian roulette.
The Control Group Study proves vaccines cause nearly all of today’s chronic diseases.

Turtles All the Way Down summary. (1200 five-star Amazon reviews).

Dissolving Illusions (3000 five-star reviews). I reproduced the Amazon book blurb as your introduction.

Vaccination Is Not Immunization book summary. This is also excellent.

1. The Control Group
Unbekoming’s outline from his post:

The Control Group Survey (2022) found that only 5.97% of unvaccinated adults had any chronic condition, compared to over 60% in the vaccinated population.

Among children under 18, 5.71% of unvaccinated children had at least one chronic condition versus 27% of vaccinated children.

The study found zero cases of autism in fully unvaccinated individuals who also avoided the Vitamin K shot and maternal vaccines, compared to national autism rates of 2.79% in 2019 and 3.49% in 2020.

Exposure to the Vitamin K shot alone was associated with an 11.73% risk of at least one disorder/disease condition, a 344% increase over the baseline rate of 2.64% for those with no exposures.

Maternal vaccination during pregnancy was linked to a 21.05% risk of at least one condition in children, a 697% increase over the baseline rate.

The study calculated the odds that vaccines are not the cause of over 90% of disabling chronic conditions in adults at 1 in 245,083,100,778,672,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (p < 4.08E-63).

According to a cited study, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) accounted for less than 1% of vaccine injuries and deaths.

The study critiques conventional vaccine safety studies, which use the 99.74% vaccine-exposed population as a baseline and potentially underestimate vaccine risks.

Glyphosate contamination was found in all live virus vaccines tested, with the MMR vaccine showing significantly higher levels.

The study concludes that avoiding vaccines and related pharmaceutical products is the most effective way to reduce the risk of chronic diseases.

The Survey is published HERE.

2. Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth
Editors - Zoey O'Toole and Mary Holland. Publication date: 2022

Overview: This comprehensive examination of vaccine science and policy investigates the disparity between public health authorities' claims about vaccine safety and the scientific evidence. Published in 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the work connects COVID-19 vaccine development to long-standing issues in routine childhood vaccination programs. The authors chose to remain anonymous, which serves two purposes: protecting them from potential professional and personal retaliation and ensuring readers focus on the strength of the arguments rather than the credentials of those making them.

Mary Holland's Foreword details how problems observed during the pandemic - rushed trials, inadequate safety monitoring, suppression of alternative treatments, and censorship of debate - mirror long-standing patterns in childhood vaccine development and safety monitoring. Holland emphasizes that the book's contribution lies in its exclusive reliance on mainstream scientific sources and government documents, deliberately avoiding references to studies or statements from anyone previously labeled "anti-vaccine."

She also notes that the book created a precedent when it received a positive review from senior academic criminologists in Harefuah, Israel's leading medical journal. Despite intense criticism, no medical professional has successfully refuted the book's claims in the years since its publication. Holland also describes how one academic offered a substantial cash prize to anyone who could refute just the first chapter's conclusions - a challenge that remains unmet.

Introduction: This meticulously outlines the multidisciplinary nature of vaccine science, demonstrating how understanding vaccines requires knowledge across numerous fields, including immunology, bacteriology, virology, epidemiology, toxicology, and various medical specialties. The authors argue that this complexity makes it virtually impossible for any expert to possess comprehensive knowledge of all relevant domains.

The introduction also addresses vital aspects beyond medical science, including the influence of corporate interests, regulatory politics, and media coverage. It explains how vaccine science and policy are warped by pharmaceutical companies' profit motives, government agencies' political considerations, and media outlets' financial relationships with these entities.

The authors warn readers that the evidence presented will challenge their beliefs about vaccine safety. They encourage intellectual courage while emphasizing their goal of definitively answering whether vaccine proponents or critics are right.

Part I - Vaccine Safety: This section examines three key pillars supporting vaccine safety claims: pre-licensing clinical trials, adverse event reporting systems, and post-marketing epidemiological studies. Through systematic analysis, the authors demonstrate that each is fundamentally flawed.

Chapter 1 - Clinical Trials: This pivotal chapter introduces the concept of "turtles all the way down" in vaccine safety testing, revealing how the clinical trial process systematically masks actual adverse event rates. Through detailed analysis of vaccine package inserts and FDA licensing documents, the authors demonstrate that none of the vaccines currently on the CDC's childhood schedule were tested against a true inert placebo in their pre-licensing trials. (Yoho: I emphasized this using italics but later realized I wanted to italicize the entire summary.)

The chapter meticulously documents how vaccine “researchers” use control groups that receive other vaccines or bioactive substances instead of inert placebos. This hides the actual adverse event rate by creating similar rates in both trial and control groups. The authors provide a comprehensive analysis of multiple vaccine trials, including:

· The DTaP vaccine family, where each new generation was tested against previous generations rather than placebos

· The Prevnar vaccine trials, where control groups received experimental vaccines rather than inert placebos

· The rotavirus vaccine trials, where control groups received the complete vaccine formulation minus only the viral component

The authors demonstrate how the rotavirus vaccine trials violated medical ethics by administering potentially harmful substances to control group infants with no possible benefit. This violation was compounded by the fact that using true placebos would have been more straightforward and scientifically valid.

Chapter 2 - The Science of Vaccine Adverse Events: This chapter reveals the near-total absence of basic research into the biological mechanisms behind vaccine adverse events. Through analysis of the 2011 Institute of Medicine report, the authors demonstrate that for more than 85% of reported adverse events, science cannot determine whether vaccines are the cause because the necessary research has never been conducted.

The chapter presents two fictional cases—Isaac's and David's stories—to demonstrate the practical implications of this knowledge gap. Isaac's case shows how the medical system's inability to recognize and prevent vaccine injury leads to tragic outcomes, while David's illustrates what proper vaccine safety science could achieve but hasn't.

The authors discuss how sixty years of modern vaccine research has provided little theoretical or practical insight into vaccine injuries. They demonstrate how the medical establishment's failure to investigate biological mechanisms of vaccine injury leaves doctors without tools to:

· Recognize and diagnose vaccine adverse events

· Identify individuals at increased risk of vaccine injury

· Understand factors affecting injury severity

· Treat vaccine-related health conditions effectively

Chapter 3 - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems: This chapter examines VAERS and similar systems worldwide, revealing how they are designed to capture only a fraction of actual adverse events. The authors explain how these systems' passive nature and voluntary reporting requirements result in tremendous underreporting; estimates suggest only 1-10% of adverse events are ever reported.

The chapter provides a detailed analysis of specific VAERS studies, including the 2009 Slade study of HPV vaccine safety, to demonstrate how authorities use the system's inherent limitations to dismiss safety concerns while simultaneously citing it as evidence of robust safety monitoring. The authors describe how the CDC blocked the implementation of an improved reporting system developed by the Lazarus research team, which found adverse event rates 100 times higher than VAERS.

The writers build their case by analyzing official documents, scientific literature, and government reports. They support their arguments using extensive references to mainstream medical journals and official health agency documents while avoiding personal commentary or speculation.

This part of the book reveals a systematic pattern in which the scientific foundation for vaccine safety claims is far weaker than health authorities portray. Through careful documentation and analysis, the authors demonstrate how key safety studies are either missing entirely or designed to obscure rather than reveal actual vaccine risks.

The common assertion is that vaccine safety is thoroughly studied and well-established through scientific research. Instead, the current system is designed to minimize detection and acknowledgment of vaccine adverse events while creating an appearance of rigorous safety oversight.

The authors maintain their focus on empirical evidence throughout, allowing readers to evaluate the strength of their arguments based on the cited mainstream sources rather than appeals to authority or emotional reasoning. This approach makes the book's conclusions challenging to dismiss, as they derive entirely from the medical establishment's documents and data. The vaccine safety monitoring system systematically fails to detect or acknowledge vaccine injuries.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://vigilantfox.news/p/bombshell-st ... -where-the
Bombshell Study Reveals Where the COVID Vaccine Deaths Are Hiding | Media Blackout

Introducing the top 10 stories they chose not to tell you this week.
#10 - Bombshell Global Study Links mRNA Vaccines to Serious Kidney Injuries

“The numbers are staggering.”

The study, led by Dr. Hyeon Seok Hwang, analyzed adverse events from the WHO’s VigiBase, and what they found is jaw-dropping: the worst vaccine-linked renal safety signals ever recorded.

While everyone talks about post-vaccine myocarditis, what no one mentions is the devastation the COVID-19 shots inflict on the kidneys.

For Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): The study found COVID-19 mRNA vaccines had a Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) of 2.38 (95% CI: 2.30–2.46).

This means people receiving COVID-19 mRNA vaccines reported AKI at more than twice the rate compared to those receiving other drugs in the WHO database.

For Glomerulonephritis (GN): Inflammation of the glomeruli—the kidney’s tiny filters—a condition that can cause swelling and kidney failure, the numbers are even worse.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines had the highest Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) for GN at 13.41 (95% CI: 12.62–14.26).

This means COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were linked to more than 13 times the expected rate of GN compared to other vaccines.

The study’s results are affirmed by the work of data analyst John Beaudoin Sr., who has been sounding the alarm on post-vaccine kidney injuries since uncovering damning data in Massachusetts.

After expanding his analysis to the entire United States, he discovered over 210,000 excess deaths from acute kidney injury (AKI) since 2021, which he blames on the hospital death protocols and the COVID-19 injections.

“We’re talking close to a quarter of a million people by a single cause of death,” he lamented.

“And because it [deaths] goes down to very young ages, what you have is the greatest number of life years lost of anything in the last 100 years in the United States, except for World War II.”

Beaudoin, who lost his son in 2018 in a car crash, says he fights to expose the data because “I want to prevent other parents from having to lose their kids.”

“And it just kills me to see these huge numbers, and I can’t get people to talk about anything but myocarditis… Excess deaths from renal failure since COVID began is 150 times more than excess deaths from myocarditis,” Beaudoin explained.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/sacrifice
SACRIFICE

This book documents the true story of Dr. James Thorp, a respected doctor of maternal-fetal medicine, who, in 2020, found that his entire profession had lost its mind, as well as its soul.

Stunned to find his col­leagues taking the bribe money, drinking the Kool-Aid, and pushing the shots, Thorp is one of the few OB/Gyns to bear witness and broadcast the multitude of pregnancy com­plications including miscarriage, stillbirths, and many other tragic outcomes resulting from the shots.

One of the few doctors from the maternal-fetal medicine realm who publicly protested the Covid shots as directly deadly to his patients’ unborn babies, Thorp witnessed the carnage daily firsthand, docu­mented it, published papers, and spoke up on countless media platforms, and at Senate hearings in Washington, DC.

He was ter­minated without any cause and went on to campaign around the country to get the truth out.
https://tdefender.substack.com/p/study- ... -get-shots
Study Finds 37 Safety Signals for COVID Vaccines During Pregnancy, CDC Still Urges Women to Get the Shots

An analysis of reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System found safety signals for 37 adverse events when COVID-19 vaccines were administered during pregnancy.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/maha-allia ... ence-video
MAHA Alliance press conference video: "We will never do that study" -- Tony Fauci

Del Bigtree and Senator Ron Johnson. My favorite part was 37 minutes into it. If you have 3 minutes, I highly recommend this.
Del Bigtree’s talk at 37 minutes is not to be missed. He says the NIH (Collins and Fauci) told RFK and Del in 2017 that the NIH would NEVER do a retrospective comparison study in the VSD database between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Why not? Presumably because the vaccine companies would be irreparably injured if such a study were to be done.

Click the image below to watch the video. The conference starts at 10 minute mark with Senator Johnson. Del starts speaking at 16 minutes and then at 37 minutes he’s on a roll talking about the lack of a comparison study and then calling out the mainstream media to assess motive: why would the NIH refuse to do such a study if vaccines were so beneficial? Why not show the world and end the misinformation?

Totally worth your time to watch.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/my-bulletp ... s-that-the
My argument that the COVID vaccines had NO benefit

Is it bulletproof? If both R0 and IFR increased due to the shots, there was no benefit.
Executive summary
Vaccines work by either:

reducing spread (aka lowering R0 which is the rate of viral spread at t=0 or Rt which is the rate of viral spread at time t>0) and/or

by lowering the risk of death if infected (i.e., they lower the infection fatality rate (IFR) which is typically measured as a change in the case fatality rate (CFR))

We can measure both impacts.

If the R0 was reduced, we’d flatten the curve. That didn’t happen. Areas that were boosted shortly before Omicron had a much higher peak than those that were less boosted. And the CFR was temporarily increased by over 2X post vaccine in large scale objective data.

Most importantly, nobody has been able to explain away the evidence I’ll show you below.

My argument
Let’s assume the vaccine saved lives.

Clearly, the greatest benefit of the vaccines will be in early 2021 because after that everyone is “naturally vaccinated” by the virus.

Secondly, vaccine efficacy wanes over time.

Therefore, if there is any benefit to be had, it would be most clearly demonstrable in early 2021.

There are only two ways a vaccine can provide a mortality benefit (and ChatGPT concurs):

reduce the R0 of subsequent variants (or the Rt of the current variant but it’s much less effective since it’s normally too late)

Reduce the IFR of the current or subsequent variants

The COVID vaccines did none of these. It increased both parameters.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/h ... very-shift
Harry Fisher, Paramedic: Every Shift, I'm Watching Vaccinated People Get Sicker and Sicker

"To my fellow healthcare workers: How long will you pretend this isn't happening? How many more patients need to suffer before you speak up?"
Real time Paramedic info:

Just worked another exhausting shift that's opened my eyes even further.

Running back-to-back calls to vaccinated patients with 'COVID' and pneumonia. The pattern is undeniable.

Just transported another nursing home patient, the nurse told me 'flu AND covid.'

I asked if their residents were all vaccinated. (Which I knew they were already) The look on her face said everything. She couldn't even respond.

These aren't isolated cases.

Every shift, I'm watching vaccinated people get sicker and sicker. Multiple infections, repeated hospitalizations. The same type of patients over and over.

The narrative was that these shots would prevent serious illness. Instead, I'm watching the opposite unfold in real time.

As a frontline healthcare worker, I wont stay silent.

This is why I refused to administer these shots.

This is why I lost my last job.

But I sleep well knowing I stood up for what's right. Well, I sleep well when the tones aren’t going off.

To my fellow healthcare workers: How long will you pretend this isn't happening? How many more patients need to suffer before you speak up?

Truth is worth losing a job over. I'll never regret choosing conscience over compliance.

God bless
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/w ... t-warns-of
World-Renowned Oncologist Warns of HORRENDOUS Surge in Cancers Among Covid-Vaccinated

“We must stop messenger RNA [mRNA] at all costs… it’s not only mad, it’s EVIL.” - Dr. Angus Dalgleish
World-renowned oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish has issued a bone-chilling warning about skyrocketing cases of deadly cancers among patients who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Dalgleish is raising the alarm that mRNA “vaccines” are causing an increase in cancer relapses.

In addition, Dalgleish warns of a growing number of cases of “turbo cancers.”

Dalgleish argues that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are the cause of skyrocketing excess deaths recorded all around the world since early 2021.

He also asserts that the injections are linked to surges in cancer, which he described as “turbo cancers.”

The disease has been found to form and spread so rapidly among vaccinated people that doctors have dubbed the phenomenon “turbo cancer.”

Doctors have revealed that some “turbo cancers” spread so quickly that seemingly healthy patients can die within a week of being diagnosed.

Oncologists are also warning that these aggressive cancers don’t respond to conventional treatments.

This phenomenon has been seen globally.

“This is happening on a horrendous scale,” Dalgleish warns.

One way in which the spike protein in the mRNA boosters can induce cancer is by removing immune surveillance, Dalgleish says.

It can also kickstart oncogenes, which are mutated versions of the proto-oncogenes that regulate normal cell growth and division.

Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at the St George’s Hospital Medical School at the University of London, is worried that this T-cell suppression has created a ticking time bomb among the general public.

In a few years’ time, the issue will result in a disastrous explosion of early cancers.

Dalgleish warns that deadly cancers in 20- to 30-year-olds – that would normally appear when a person is 70 to 80 years old – are already surging.

He has been speaking out since 2022 about the increase in cancers that he and other doctors have witnessed and has written several articles on the subject.

Dalgleish says research indicates that the mRNA “vaccines” are causing both T-cell suppression and antibody class switching.

“What the latter means is that, instead of having antibodies that will neutralize viruses and play their role in controlling cancer, you’re tolerizing,” he said.

“You are basically converting the immune system into one of toleration, which is what you do in the case of organ transplants so as to avoid rejection.

“This is the first thing that’s happening. It is bad enough, but is potentially correctable.

“But it’s worse than that because we now know that the virus integrates into the genome and replicates.

“This means that it can switch on oncogenes and switch off suppressor genes.

“We know very clearly from lab data that it does both.

“I think the turbo cancers are probably caused by that.”

Oncogenes can cause cells to divide uncontrollably by making too many copies of themselves or by becoming more active than normal.

Dalgleish cites the six cases of highly aggressive cancer he witnessed after returning from a trip to Australia.

“They included a case of pancreatic cancer and a case of glioma [a cancer that starts in the glial cells of the brain or spinal cord],” Dalgleish said.

“There were two cases of colorectal cancer and two cases of resurgent breast cancer.”

Dalgleish asked the patients about their vaccination history.

He noted that all of them had had mRNA “booster” vaccinations between three and six weeks earlier.

“Not one GP, one surgeon, or one oncologist had asked about their vaccine history,” he notes.

In three of these cancer cases, the presence of the vaccine spike protein in the cancerous cells could have been proved as the tumors were surgically removed, Dalgleish says.

Dalgleish has seen patients who have been cancer-free for years but relapsed within weeks of receiving an mRNA booster vaccination.

“The reason they relapsed is because their T cells were switched off,” he explains.

The spike protein can also induce cancer by binding to the suppressor genes, Dalgleish says.

He says that everyone who’s received an mRNA Covid vaccination should be tested for the presence of the spike protein.

“Not antibodies. The spike protein,” he explained.

“And if it’s high, and they’ve got cancer, you would need to see how you can neutralize it.”

Dangleish has been issuing increasing warnings that Covid mRNA injections cause cancer in recent months.

He recently warned that the “evil” injections have triggered a global “explosion” in cases of deadly “turbo cancers.”

As Slay News reported, Prof. Dalgleish, who is best known for his groundbreaking contributions to HIV/AIDS research, raised the alarm during an international forum of experts investigating the mass Covid vaccination campaign.

He warned that he has seen an “explosion” of deadly “turbo cancers” in his patients who have received Covid mRNA injections.

While addressing the Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International forum, founded by Dr. Stephen Frost and moderated by Charles Kovess, Dalgleish told the panel of experts:

“We must stop messenger RNA [mRNA] at all costs… it’s not only mad, it’s evil.”
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/l ... ound-alarm
Leading American Doctors Sound Alarm Over ‘Severe’ Heart & Brain Damage Among Covid-Vaccinated

A group of leading American doctors and scientists is sounding the alarm after confirming that “severe” cases of heart and brain damage are a “reaction” to Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
A group of leading American doctors and scientists is sounding the alarm after confirming that “severe” cases of heart and brain damage are a “reaction” to Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The warning was issued in a report from the Mercer University School of Medicine in Georgia.

A team of researchers, led by renowned cardiologist Dr. Abraham M. Enyeji, specifically linked Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections to surges in “severe cardiovascular and neurological” injuries.

The alarming report was published in the Annals of Cardiology.

In their report, the researchers present a case study of a patient who suffered a severe cardiovascular and neurological reaction following the Moderna (mRNA) Covid vaccine.

The report describes a 65-year-old male who developed coronary artery occlusion and internuclear ophthalmoplegia weeks after receiving the mRNA “vaccine.”

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia is a condition affecting eye movement that was rarely seen before the Covid “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

The researchers document the patient’s symptoms, imaging findings (CT angiography, MRI), and laboratory results (elevated D-dimer, persistent spike protein antibodies).

The patient was suffering from vision problems, dysphagia, and severe coronary stenosis.

However, the report notes that the patient was in good health and did not suffer from heart disease prior to the “vaccine.”

The patient had developed severe cardiovascular complications post-vaccination.

Notably, his left carotid artery was 69% blocked.

He developed severe coronary stenosis, requiring intervention.

His neurological symptoms included double vision and imbalance.

The doctors found that the neurological symptoms were caused by vaccine-induced inflammation or thrombotic events.

The patient had elevated spike protein antibodies, which the researchers link to vaccine persistence rather than a natural infection.

However, they note that their vaccine-induced spike protein elevation findings will not be universally accepted in mainstream medical literature.

Treatment included stent placement and, controversially, ivermectin, based on the hypothesis that it might reduce spike protein interactions.

“In conclusion, this case highlights the significant risk of thrombotic events following vaccination with the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine,” the researchers write in their report.

“The interplay between heparin and the spike protein underscores the need for careful monitoring and individualized treatment strategies in such cases.

“The observed cranial nerve lesions and visual defects emphasize the importance of being vigilant about neurological complications related to COVID-19 and its vaccination.

“Further research is crucial to elucidate the mechanisms behind vaccine-induced thrombosis and to develop guidelines that optimize patient outcomes while ensuring the safe administration of vaccines to vulnerable populations.”

The study raises major concerns about vaccine safety, potential thrombotic complications, and the role of spike protein persistence in vascular events.

The researchers warn that the risk of issues could be greatly elevated in those with underlying conditions.

The report will undoubtedly fuel ongoing debates on long-term vaccine safety, particularly regarding persistent spike protein concerns.

It comes amid a swelling body of evidence linking Covid mRNA “vaccines” to serious illness, deadly diseases, disabilities, and death.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers.

The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination.

As Slay News previously reported, leading scientists have been warning for some time that surges in deadly cancers among the Covid-vaccinated were caused by DNA fragments in the mRNA injections.

Those warnings have now been confirmed in a bombshell study conducted in the FDA’s own laboratory.

Tests conducted at the FDA’s White Oak Campus in Maryland found shocking levels of DNA contamination in the “vaccines.”

The residual DNA levels exceeded regulatory safety limits by 6 to 470 times.

While six times the safe limit would be alarming, 470 times is unprecedented and devastating.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Cool Breeze
Posts: 3040
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:19 pm

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by Cool Breeze »

Tim, how long do you think it'll take to see major mortality? What levels would you consider major? Of course, most don't see it because they don't want to, and if the deaths are drawn out over time, people will just claim it was "bad luck" or old age.
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

Cool Breeze wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:07 pm Tim, how long do you think it'll take to see major mortality? What levels would you consider major? Of course, most don't see it because they don't want to, and if the deaths are drawn out over time, people will just claim it was "bad luck" or old age.
The data already shows there has been major mortality. I believe Ed Dowd said 60,000 millennials alone died over a year or two after the shots were mandated by most employers.

We don't know the true numbers of injected Americans and we don't know if those who were injected are yet to have a health event.

Image
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
tim
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:33 am

Re: Religion and Vaccine Arguments

Post by tim »

Being that China and the U.S. are in a fourth turning, its possible that the mRNA shots were a Chinese sneak attack on the U.S.

The idea was first proposed by Naomi Wolf and Jeff Nyquist. China had involvement with the mRNA shots yet never used them on their people.

This is one the of the biggest red flags:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-fi ... 27541.html
Two years after the first countries approved the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine for domestic use, China will finally allow the mRNA vaccine to be used domestically—but there's a catch.

On Friday, China confirmed in a press briefing that it would let German nationals receive the BioNTech COVID vaccine, which uses mRNA technology, in exchange for German health authorities on Wednesday approving China's Sinovac jab for Chinese nationals living in Germany.
Naomi Wolf has said that the initial trials of the mRNA shot were conducted in China by the CCP.

Numerous Chinese companies manufacture the lipid nano particles that are used in the mRNA shots. These shots are not used on the Chinese people.

https://x.com/Sunchaser6ix/status/18691 ... 15455?mx=2
Concerning given:

Naomi Wolf has discussed Pfizer's vaccine manufacturing in Germany, highlighting its co-ownership with Chinese firms. She has mentioned the following points:

Pfizer's Control by the CCP: Wolf has stated that Pfizer is essentially controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) due to BioNTech, the subsidiary that manufactures Pfizer's injections, having signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Fosun Pharma, one of China's largest CCP-controlled pharmaceutical companies.

BioNTech and Fosun Pharma: According to Wolf, BioNTech, which makes the vaccine, is described as a German-Chinese company due to this partnership. She has emphasized that in 2021, there was a 100% completed tech transfer 'to China' as per an SEC filing, indicating significant Chinese involvement in the manufacturing process.

Geopolitical Concerns: Wolf has also commented on the geopolitical implications of this partnership, suggesting that the vaccine production involves significant Chinese influence, challenging the perception of Pfizer and BioNTech as solely German entities.

These sentiments have been shared in posts on X, where Naomi Wolf has been vocal about these connections, raising concerns about control, transparency, and the geopolitical ramifications of such partnerships in vaccine production.
“Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; - Exodus 20:5
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests