The Control Group Study proves vaccines cause nearly all of today’s chronic diseases.
Turtles All the Way Down summary. (1200 five-star Amazon reviews).
Dissolving Illusions (3000 five-star reviews). I reproduced the Amazon book blurb as your introduction.
Vaccination Is Not Immunization book summary. This is also excellent.
1. The Control Group
Unbekoming’s outline from his post:
The Control Group Survey (2022) found that only 5.97% of unvaccinated adults had any chronic condition, compared to over 60% in the vaccinated population.
Among children under 18, 5.71% of unvaccinated children had at least one chronic condition versus 27% of vaccinated children.
The study found zero cases of autism in fully unvaccinated individuals who also avoided the Vitamin K shot and maternal vaccines, compared to national autism rates of 2.79% in 2019 and 3.49% in 2020.
Exposure to the Vitamin K shot alone was associated with an 11.73% risk of at least one disorder/disease condition, a 344% increase over the baseline rate of 2.64% for those with no exposures.
Maternal vaccination during pregnancy was linked to a 21.05% risk of at least one condition in children, a 697% increase over the baseline rate.
The study calculated the odds that vaccines are not the cause of over 90% of disabling chronic conditions in adults at 1 in 245,083,100,778,672,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (p < 4.08E-63).
According to a cited study, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) accounted for less than 1% of vaccine injuries and deaths.
The study critiques conventional vaccine safety studies, which use the 99.74% vaccine-exposed population as a baseline and potentially underestimate vaccine risks.
Glyphosate contamination was found in all live virus vaccines tested, with the MMR vaccine showing significantly higher levels.
The study concludes that avoiding vaccines and related pharmaceutical products is the most effective way to reduce the risk of chronic diseases.
The Survey is published HERE.
2. Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth
Editors - Zoey O'Toole and Mary Holland. Publication date: 2022
Overview: This comprehensive examination of vaccine science and policy investigates the disparity between public health authorities' claims about vaccine safety and the scientific evidence. Published in 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic, the work connects COVID-19 vaccine development to long-standing issues in routine childhood vaccination programs. The authors chose to remain anonymous, which serves two purposes: protecting them from potential professional and personal retaliation and ensuring readers focus on the strength of the arguments rather than the credentials of those making them.
Mary Holland's Foreword details how problems observed during the pandemic - rushed trials, inadequate safety monitoring, suppression of alternative treatments, and censorship of debate - mirror long-standing patterns in childhood vaccine development and safety monitoring. Holland emphasizes that the book's contribution lies in its exclusive reliance on mainstream scientific sources and government documents, deliberately avoiding references to studies or statements from anyone previously labeled "anti-vaccine."
She also notes that the book created a precedent when it received a positive review from senior academic criminologists in Harefuah, Israel's leading medical journal. Despite intense criticism, no medical professional has successfully refuted the book's claims in the years since its publication. Holland also describes how one academic offered a substantial cash prize to anyone who could refute just the first chapter's conclusions - a challenge that remains unmet.
Introduction: This meticulously outlines the multidisciplinary nature of vaccine science, demonstrating how understanding vaccines requires knowledge across numerous fields, including immunology, bacteriology, virology, epidemiology, toxicology, and various medical specialties. The authors argue that this complexity makes it virtually impossible for any expert to possess comprehensive knowledge of all relevant domains.
The introduction also addresses vital aspects beyond medical science, including the influence of corporate interests, regulatory politics, and media coverage. It explains how vaccine science and policy are warped by pharmaceutical companies' profit motives, government agencies' political considerations, and media outlets' financial relationships with these entities.
The authors warn readers that the evidence presented will challenge their beliefs about vaccine safety. They encourage intellectual courage while emphasizing their goal of definitively answering whether vaccine proponents or critics are right.
Part I - Vaccine Safety: This section examines three key pillars supporting vaccine safety claims: pre-licensing clinical trials, adverse event reporting systems, and post-marketing epidemiological studies. Through systematic analysis, the authors demonstrate that each is fundamentally flawed.
Chapter 1 - Clinical Trials: This pivotal chapter introduces the concept of "turtles all the way down" in vaccine safety testing, revealing how the clinical trial process systematically masks actual adverse event rates. Through detailed analysis of vaccine package inserts and FDA licensing documents, the authors demonstrate that none of the vaccines currently on the CDC's childhood schedule were tested against a true inert placebo in their pre-licensing trials. (Yoho: I emphasized this using italics but later realized I wanted to italicize the entire summary.)
The chapter meticulously documents how vaccine “researchers” use control groups that receive other vaccines or bioactive substances instead of inert placebos. This hides the actual adverse event rate by creating similar rates in both trial and control groups. The authors provide a comprehensive analysis of multiple vaccine trials, including:
· The DTaP vaccine family, where each new generation was tested against previous generations rather than placebos
· The Prevnar vaccine trials, where control groups received experimental vaccines rather than inert placebos
· The rotavirus vaccine trials, where control groups received the complete vaccine formulation minus only the viral component
The authors demonstrate how the rotavirus vaccine trials violated medical ethics by administering potentially harmful substances to control group infants with no possible benefit. This violation was compounded by the fact that using true placebos would have been more straightforward and scientifically valid.
Chapter 2 - The Science of Vaccine Adverse Events: This chapter reveals the near-total absence of basic research into the biological mechanisms behind vaccine adverse events. Through analysis of the 2011 Institute of Medicine report, the authors demonstrate that for more than 85% of reported adverse events, science cannot determine whether vaccines are the cause because the necessary research has never been conducted.
The chapter presents two fictional cases—Isaac's and David's stories—to demonstrate the practical implications of this knowledge gap. Isaac's case shows how the medical system's inability to recognize and prevent vaccine injury leads to tragic outcomes, while David's illustrates what proper vaccine safety science could achieve but hasn't.
The authors discuss how sixty years of modern vaccine research has provided little theoretical or practical insight into vaccine injuries. They demonstrate how the medical establishment's failure to investigate biological mechanisms of vaccine injury leaves doctors without tools to:
· Recognize and diagnose vaccine adverse events
· Identify individuals at increased risk of vaccine injury
· Understand factors affecting injury severity
· Treat vaccine-related health conditions effectively
Chapter 3 - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems: This chapter examines VAERS and similar systems worldwide, revealing how they are designed to capture only a fraction of actual adverse events. The authors explain how these systems' passive nature and voluntary reporting requirements result in tremendous underreporting; estimates suggest only 1-10% of adverse events are ever reported.
The chapter provides a detailed analysis of specific VAERS studies, including the 2009 Slade study of HPV vaccine safety, to demonstrate how authorities use the system's inherent limitations to dismiss safety concerns while simultaneously citing it as evidence of robust safety monitoring. The authors describe how the CDC blocked the implementation of an improved reporting system developed by the Lazarus research team, which found adverse event rates 100 times higher than VAERS.
The writers build their case by analyzing official documents, scientific literature, and government reports. They support their arguments using extensive references to mainstream medical journals and official health agency documents while avoiding personal commentary or speculation.
This part of the book reveals a systematic pattern in which the scientific foundation for vaccine safety claims is far weaker than health authorities portray. Through careful documentation and analysis, the authors demonstrate how key safety studies are either missing entirely or designed to obscure rather than reveal actual vaccine risks.
The common assertion is that vaccine safety is thoroughly studied and well-established through scientific research. Instead, the current system is designed to minimize detection and acknowledgment of vaccine adverse events while creating an appearance of rigorous safety oversight.
The authors maintain their focus on empirical evidence throughout, allowing readers to evaluate the strength of their arguments based on the cited mainstream sources rather than appeals to authority or emotional reasoning. This approach makes the book's conclusions challenging to dismiss, as they derive entirely from the medical establishment's documents and data. The vaccine safety monitoring system systematically fails to detect or acknowledge vaccine injuries.
