Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 7:25 am
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-0 ... eath-saver
The whole construct of the current fiat regime is to fracture and eliminate the
middle class to subducate them into cartels as we have noted countless times.
Since the regime construct of the banker war since 1863 is size to meet cartel
commodity blocks there is no moral high ground. Even the czar understood when he
defended Lincolns flank of the san fransico gold supply on the west coast
he sent the clear notice to the banking war cartels in europe. As the keiser noted
social security is for veterans peace of mind. Currently 63 million are attached to the
MIC voter block teat. The numbers speak for themselves over the last
couple of years to the overall unsustainable social security abuses from Stratagems to the early
demise from even simple corrosive math skills to the insurance program it actually is.
The point remains since 1964 it was simple logic and the current mental illness of dimmcrats
to destroy the republic. The red diapers have overrun the system. The cycle is almost complete
as I watched the attack dog reid spew his current paid for 100 million political cycle madness upon us.
I see no solution with any thing and I mean thing with any tenure over 12 years willing to counter
these animal farmed creatures. I seen a decent list of 14 items the so called public deems relavent.
I do see a relavent conversation in the first place with either party to date. The energy question stood
out as did the current spending maniacs talking points unrelated to reality of trade balance.
Both partys are deranged and detached from fiscal sanity point blank.
Thought map of an era I do not agree or disagree with but worth reading the topical realitys
written during the commodity cotton war earlier and the over production in two other zones
when you drill down to the relavant topical facts. For another facet read Alfred Marshall for
the LSE vein of modalities.
http://socialistaotearoa.blogspot.be/20 ... mburg.html
http://online.saintleo.edu/military-fri ... leges.aspx
http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/ ... #audiences
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_x ... um_en.html intent
Hence we have the family, the "society" of a man's house - a society very small, one must admit, but none the less a true society, and one older than any State. Consequently, it has rights and duties peculiar to itself which are quite independent of the State.
The state has no claim on my capital, to sieze capital to murder the unborn in any stage to the states preface of morals.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-0 ... eath-saver I will not support evil since no burden has not been done
at the Cross. All debt is gone and the neo pagan rentier statements are clearly understood under my roof.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_ ... ns_en.html
Everybody knows that capitalism has a definite historical meaning as a system, an economic and social system, opposed to "socialism" or "communism". But in the light of the analysis of the fundamental reality of the whole economic process-first and foremost of the production structure that work is-it should be recognized that the error of early capitalism can be repeated wherever man is in a way treated on the same level as the whole complex of the material means of production, as an instrument and not in accordance with the true dignity of his work-that is to say, where he is not treated as subject and maker, and for this very reason as the true purpose of the whole process of production.
Without this consideration it is impossible to understand the meaning of the virtue of industriousness, and more particularly it is impossible to understand why industriousness should be a virtue: for virtue, as a moral habit, is something whereby man becomes good as man. This fact in no way alters our justifiable anxiety that in work, whereby matter gains in nobility, man himself should not experience a lowering of his own dignity. Again, it is well known that it is possible to use work in various ways against man, that it is possible to punish man with the system.
Cf. Summa Th. I-II, q. 40, a. 1, c.; I-II, q. 34, a. 2, ad 1.
The whole construct of the current fiat regime is to fracture and eliminate the
middle class to subducate them into cartels as we have noted countless times.
Since the regime construct of the banker war since 1863 is size to meet cartel
commodity blocks there is no moral high ground. Even the czar understood when he
defended Lincolns flank of the san fransico gold supply on the west coast
he sent the clear notice to the banking war cartels in europe. As the keiser noted
social security is for veterans peace of mind. Currently 63 million are attached to the
MIC voter block teat. The numbers speak for themselves over the last
couple of years to the overall unsustainable social security abuses from Stratagems to the early
demise from even simple corrosive math skills to the insurance program it actually is.
The point remains since 1964 it was simple logic and the current mental illness of dimmcrats
to destroy the republic. The red diapers have overrun the system. The cycle is almost complete
as I watched the attack dog reid spew his current paid for 100 million political cycle madness upon us.
I see no solution with any thing and I mean thing with any tenure over 12 years willing to counter
these animal farmed creatures. I seen a decent list of 14 items the so called public deems relavent.
I do see a relavent conversation in the first place with either party to date. The energy question stood
out as did the current spending maniacs talking points unrelated to reality of trade balance.
Both partys are deranged and detached from fiscal sanity point blank.
Thought map of an era I do not agree or disagree with but worth reading the topical realitys
written during the commodity cotton war earlier and the over production in two other zones
when you drill down to the relavant topical facts. For another facet read Alfred Marshall for
the LSE vein of modalities.
http://socialistaotearoa.blogspot.be/20 ... mburg.html
http://online.saintleo.edu/military-fri ... leges.aspx
http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/ ... #audiences
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_x ... um_en.html intent
Hence we have the family, the "society" of a man's house - a society very small, one must admit, but none the less a true society, and one older than any State. Consequently, it has rights and duties peculiar to itself which are quite independent of the State.
The state has no claim on my capital, to sieze capital to murder the unborn in any stage to the states preface of morals.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-0 ... eath-saver I will not support evil since no burden has not been done
at the Cross. All debt is gone and the neo pagan rentier statements are clearly understood under my roof.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_ ... ns_en.html
Everybody knows that capitalism has a definite historical meaning as a system, an economic and social system, opposed to "socialism" or "communism". But in the light of the analysis of the fundamental reality of the whole economic process-first and foremost of the production structure that work is-it should be recognized that the error of early capitalism can be repeated wherever man is in a way treated on the same level as the whole complex of the material means of production, as an instrument and not in accordance with the true dignity of his work-that is to say, where he is not treated as subject and maker, and for this very reason as the true purpose of the whole process of production.
Without this consideration it is impossible to understand the meaning of the virtue of industriousness, and more particularly it is impossible to understand why industriousness should be a virtue: for virtue, as a moral habit, is something whereby man becomes good as man. This fact in no way alters our justifiable anxiety that in work, whereby matter gains in nobility, man himself should not experience a lowering of his own dignity. Again, it is well known that it is possible to use work in various ways against man, that it is possible to punish man with the system.
Cf. Summa Th. I-II, q. 40, a. 1, c.; I-II, q. 34, a. 2, ad 1.