A real leader like Francisco Franco to restore the Republic would be cleaner and better for everyone, though just like in Spain, all the degen Bishes wouldn't like it. Of course, that's the point.
Actually, while Franco was a dictator for his lifetime, he set up his successor to switch Spain over to a democracy when he was gone. No violence. No revolt. When compared to the Civil War before WW II, it was well done.
Please cease making up lies about my position. I requested this once, this is twice.
Dr. Robert Malone is now talking about the CCP bioweapons program, including Chi Haotian's secret speech about "cleaning up" America with biological weapons.
They can talk about bioweapons all they want, but the real bioweapon (I think as you know tim) is the "vaccine." Nyquist should know this; I wouldn't trust his analysis if he doesn't - it is a huge gap in understanding for a geopolitical analyst, just as I commonly state that it's a huge problem and gap in thinking on this site. If you don't know why it proves my point entirely, something that is always fun and amusing, given the ire I draw here, time and again.
As far as I can tell Nyquist was the first one to say the vaccine is the bioweapon and not the virus. Nyquist was asking why China and Russia weren't using mRNA shots on their people.
Nyquist also was the first to post Chi Haotian's speech, so when viewed with that knowledge its easier to understand how the vaccine would be the bioweapon.
There are many actors who would like to diminish our national strength. We haven't seen much evidence of a coordinated effort by anyone besides the people in our own government pushing the narrative. And that could be something to pay attention to. Maybe you have seen that the communists learned first hand that that the best way to destroy a nation is from within. We're being gutted methodically by forces who have our destruction as their goal. Pillars of our society are being whittled away and broken. Although it's a part of the generational trend, it's also circumvented and pushed in a more destructive path. That's the theory of their plan, is it not? To have us not stumble, but fall upon our own sword.
There will be a major global financial panic and crisis. Supply chains will break, resulting in unavailability of critical raw materials and components. Global trade will begin to shut down. As it begins to become apparent that the supply chain linkages are permanently broken, the global interlinked financial markets will shut down and cease to exist. This will all happen very quickly. It will not take years from the initial panic.
The focus of governments will turn to controlling their panicked and hungry populations. Due to lack of availability of imported goods and adequate storage "sufficient to reconstitute" a system consistent with nation state government, this will prove to be too little too late and most government will devolve to the local level as populations lose faith in their national governments and the national governments lose the resources and ability to control their populations.
There will be no large scale nuclear war. Instead, the population will be culled through starvation, local strife (including settling of long-standing scores) and disease. Wave after wave of pandemics will sweep the world.
Similar to national economies and governments, centralized utilities will fail or become so decrepit as to be unsafe and unusable. All centralized utilities including the power grid will shut down permanently.
The initial worldwide kill rate during the first couple decades following the financial panic will exceed 90%. The global population will be in the range of a few tens of millions when the bottom is hit in two or three centuries. Similar to the last dark age, the world's largest cities will have a population on the order of 25,000 and a large town will be 1,000.
Life during the coming dark age will be similar to the last dark age but worse due to environmental damage and pollution.
I love these predictions, you deserve a lot of credit because they are bold and appear that they will be very close to reality. I'm not sure to what degree, though. What does "power grid shut down permanently" really mean? Your population angle is amazing in its degree (of loss) ... so wow. Bold, I like it. I don't think that far, or anywhere near that, but that is a crazy, crazy loss. It seems you foresee a dark, dystopian world, huh? I say in the next 10 years we lose 25-50% of the population, but that's "it." lol, I hope not, but it's just a prediction
Please cease making up lies about my position. I requested this once, this is twice.
I do not and I cannot respond or react to generic claims or accusations. So I can't help you here. Put on your big boy pants and actually say concrete things, and it would be easy for you to point out what was incorrectly quoted, etc.
They can talk about bioweapons all they want, but the real bioweapon (I think as you know tim) is the "vaccine." Nyquist should know this; I wouldn't trust his analysis if he doesn't - it is a huge gap in understanding for a geopolitical analyst, just as I commonly state that it's a huge problem and gap in thinking on this site. If you don't know why it proves my point entirely, something that is always fun and amusing, given the ire I draw here, time and again.
As far as I can tell Nyquist was the first one to say the vaccine is the bioweapon and not the virus. Nyquist was asking why China and Russia weren't using mRNA shots on their people.
Nyquist also was the first to post Chi Haotian's speech, so when viewed with that knowledge its easier to understand how the vaccine would be the bioweapon.
There are many actors who would like to diminish our national strength. We haven't seen much evidence of a coordinated effort by anyone besides the people in our own government pushing the narrative. And that could be something to pay attention to. Maybe you have seen that the communists learned first hand that that the best way to destroy a nation is from within. We're being gutted methodically by forces who have our destruction as their goal. Pillars of our society are being whittled away and broken. Although it's a part of the generational trend, it's also circumvented and pushed in a more destructive path. That's the theory of their plan, is it not? To have us not stumble, but fall upon our own sword.
Yes, that goal was accomplished already in the 1960s. Sad to say, I hope older people actually wake up to this fact.
Please cease making up lies about my position. I requested this once, this is twice.
I do not and I cannot respond or react to generic claims or accusations. So I can't help you here. Put on your big boy pants and actually say concrete things, and it would be easy for you to point out what was incorrectly quoted, etc.
I assumed I was one of “all the degenerate Bishes.” I do speak clearly enough. You are the only one who has complained, Somehow, you say you are unable to comprehend correctly my position but attribute false positions regularly. For a third time, stop your persistent lies. Do not reference me by name. You are in blatant violation of the site rules.
I love these predictions, you deserve a lot of credit because they are bold and appear that they will be very close to reality. I'm not sure to what degree, though. What does "power grid shut down permanently" really mean? Your population angle is amazing in its degree (of loss) ... so wow. Bold, I like it. I don't think that far, or anywhere near that, but that is a crazy, crazy loss. It seems you foresee a dark, dystopian world, huh? I say in the next 10 years we lose 25-50% of the population, but that's "it." lol, I hope not, but it's just a prediction
I posted a lot a few years ago about the population overshoot, the probable population loss during the last dark age, megacities, and sustainable growth rates. As far as the power grid, I mean the existing grid. In the distant future, I believe small scale decentralized power will exist in some or most places, but not a grid that covers the entire US (or the entire US except for Texas). I think by 2050 it'll be a pretty good world for most people, but the next 20-25 years or so are going to be very difficult.
While the periphery breaks down rather slowly at first, the capital cities of the hegemon should collapse suddenly and violently.
As far as I can tell Nyquist was the first one to say the vaccine is the bioweapon and not the virus. Nyquist was asking why China and Russia weren't using mRNA shots on their people.
Nyquist also was the first to post Chi Haotian's speech, so when viewed with that knowledge its easier to understand how the vaccine would be the bioweapon.
There are many actors who would like to diminish our national strength. We haven't seen much evidence of a coordinated effort by anyone besides the people in our own government pushing the narrative. And that could be something to pay attention to. Maybe you have seen that the communists learned first hand that that the best way to destroy a nation is from within. We're being gutted methodically by forces who have our destruction as their goal. Pillars of our society are being whittled away and broken. Although it's a part of the generational trend, it's also circumvented and pushed in a more destructive path. That's the theory of their plan, is it not? To have us not stumble, but fall upon our own sword.
Yes, that goal was accomplished already in the 1960s. Sad to say, I hope older people actually wake up to this fact.
I wouldn't dismiss this issue so quickly. It's something of paramount importance during this struggle against tyranny from both without and within.
I love these predictions, you deserve a lot of credit because they are bold and appear that they will be very close to reality. I'm not sure to what degree, though. What does "power grid shut down permanently" really mean? Your population angle is amazing in its degree (of loss) ... so wow. Bold, I like it. I don't think that far, or anywhere near that, but that is a crazy, crazy loss. It seems you foresee a dark, dystopian world, huh? I say in the next 10 years we lose 25-50% of the population, but that's "it." lol, I hope not, but it's just a prediction
I posted a lot a few years ago about the population overshoot, the probable population loss during the last dark age, megacities, and sustainable growth rates. As far as the power grid, I mean the existing grid. In the distant future, I believe small scale decentralized power will exist in some or most places, but not a grid that covers the entire US (or the entire US except for Texas). I think by 2050 it'll be a pretty good world for most people, but the next 20-25 years or so are going to be very difficult.
I'm loving you and your analysis more by the day. Great stuff.
There are many actors who would like to diminish our national strength. We haven't seen much evidence of a coordinated effort by anyone besides the people in our own government pushing the narrative. And that could be something to pay attention to. Maybe you have seen that the communists learned first hand that that the best way to destroy a nation is from within. We're being gutted methodically by forces who have our destruction as their goal. Pillars of our society are being whittled away and broken. Although it's a part of the generational trend, it's also circumvented and pushed in a more destructive path. That's the theory of their plan, is it not? To have us not stumble, but fall upon our own sword.
Yes, that goal was accomplished already in the 1960s. Sad to say, I hope older people actually wake up to this fact.
I wouldn't dismiss this issue so quickly. It's something of paramount importance during this struggle against tyranny from both without and within.
My point was that "we" woke up way too late. The damage is done. The west has destroyed women, and thus destroyed men. It was over for modern men before it started. Much of that is due to the population boom and dysgenics, yes, but nonetheless we are where we are. Now, wheat and tares sifting.
