John wrote:...
I'm sorry that you don't like Anglo-Saxons talking about Eastern
Europe, but there are two things you should keep in mind.
First, the euro is only ten years old, and could very well collapse
completely at any time.
Second, the last major international banking crisis was triggered by
the failure of the Austrian Credit-Anstalt on May 11, 1931, and a lot
of people are nervous about the possibility that Austria could lead
the way again.
The state of the Austrian economy and the Austrian banking system are
of interest to a lot of people besides Evans-Pritchard. How about
providing some of your insight about what's going on in Austria?
Actually, I do not care what Anglo-Saxons talking about Eastern
Europe.
I know what happened 1931 in Austria too.
Only what I could not find is:
- How you believe that "history repeated itself" - so literally?
That is - in my point of view - the main disturbing point in your explanations and theories.
The "Generational Dynamic theory" has some interesting ideas, because it looks that there are "a pattern of repeatings". (Even if "repeatings are not quite simple "repeatings" but sooner - similarities.)
In case of "predictions" on this kind of "theory" - the problem is always quite simple:
1. the huge amount of correlated data and lack of reliabilities in collected.
2. personally "believe in something" - in concrete case believe that "history always literally repeated itself."
But, never mind.
You ask about my opinion in situation in Austria and Europe.
Yes.
I can not say that you are not correct.
BUT I think that you can have more difficulties to prove your assumptions about euro correct.
If you ask me:
- are European banks greedy?
- is there in EU enormous bureaucracy?
- are there in EU a some kind of "financial mafia" in the power?
Answers are : Yes... Yes... Yes...
In normal situation - I could not see anything bright here, but when I take a another look - the things showed little bit different.
Despite all "Yeses" above, the EU in my point of view has also little bit luck... Namely EU was NOT the "Zentrum der Macht".
It is (WAS) - US and the little satellite GB.
All those financial engineerings was invented by "US financial engineers" (Actually I believe that original "engineers" were probably "GB financial engineers" - but that is not important right now).
Since US and GB had quite much more time to enjoy the fruits of "financial engineerings" - the logical implication is that they are much more deep in the shit too.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But what happened in the last par months?
Increasingly choir of US, GB and "journalists and experts" near this sphere - "find" suddenly that EU has a "Great problem with East Europe"!!!
Even much bigger than "Anglo-Saxons"!!!
Wou!!!
Lets see little more on the facts, before we here in Europe starting to shiver.
1. Lets from "Anglo-Saxon" media "analogies" - there are two:
- Eastern Europe is the “subprime crisis” of the EU (understand: of course, everyone has its "own" subprime crisis (
Which is of course wrong:
no other country than the US and the UK presents such a convergence of disasters)
- a crisis in Eastern Europe will have the same terrible effect as the 1997 Asia crisis.
2. Of course "specialists" are always available for "Anglo-Saxons":
http://uk.reuters.com/article/hotStocks ... EO20090217
(in this case Moodys, which, first of all, is completely devoted to Wall Street, and then is incapable of seeing “an elephant in a corridor” (they missed the
subprimes, the CDS, Bear Stearn, Lehman Brothers, AIG, ….).
But, for some "mysterious reason", the financial media keeps on repeating Moodys "specialist" opinions, probably applying the principle that they could be right some day purely out of statistical chance.)
3. To make the idea more credible, different "specialist" media (such as cited UK’s Telegraph and between others - Mr. Pritchard) "explaining" constantly this mysterious ticking bomb in Europe - but is currently blinded as regards the Eurozone by the collapse of the British economy and Pound Sterling)
Those "news items" circulate... and circulate ... so it with time "hopefully gain some credibility".
I think that this rubbish is possible to find each day in all Anglo-Saxon financial "news" at least couple times.
The main US and UK financial media, knowing the others will follow out of habit (it is so easy as regards the EU, slow as it is to understand and even slower to react, with the inevitable dissent that makes it possible for the manipulation to gain momentum).
So, as said you are able to read in "world financial media" similar titles about "EU devastating bombs" from :
- Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland, Latvia, Romania etc...etc... "defaulting on debts" and that is "a bomb"!!!
Boom!!!
This is indeed the core of the problem: in economy and finance, size matters -
AND ALL the new Member-States put together
comprise less than 10 percent of the EU GDP (among them, the biggest and richest ones, such as Poland and the Czech Republic, are hardly affected at all)
Never the less, there are indeed problems ahead for these countries and those commercially and financially involved with them, but these problems are no more serious than the average problems encountered by the global financial system; and they certainly do not compare with the problems faced by the financial markets of New York or London.
The bank most often cited as being the “detonator” of this “Eastern-European bomb”, i.e. the
Austrian bank Raiffeisen , increased its profits
17 percent in 2008; a result beyond the wildest dreams of most US and UK banks today.
A good article with many facts about EU (Austrian too) banks in Eastern Europe:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/122856- ... overstated
Even this:
http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/analytics/?doc=10712
On the end, when talking about "real estates" even in East Europe - the price will fall.
It is clear (for same reason I explained before about China) - but it is also clear that prices will NOT fall dramatically.
After 50 years of communism, there is a shortage of modern buildings. And besides those buildings are mostly of good quality and NOT ballooned in price as US real estates. There on contrary (in US) an excessive number of houses were built during the last housing bubble, of variable quality and already depreciating in value in the most affected states. There, there is a real destruction of wealth for landowners, creditors, banks and the economy altogether.
Nonsense about Ukraine (I do not know when it become EU country?) - has special position.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/25/easter ... ubini.html
Ukraine is just a puppet of US in its "global fight" against Russia and its “orange revolution”(orchestrated from Washington of course).
Yes.
Collapse in Ukraine can cause problem in EU too, but similar as - dollar collapse.
A collapse of Ukraine (and of course overtaking from Russia) does not mean a collapse of EU and its policy. Sooner US (UK) policy.
To summarize:
The "news" about "bomb in Eastern Europe" and with "collapse of EU (Austrian) banks" - is in my opinion and with facts - just political manipulation of Anglo-Saxon media in accordance to cover huge problem - in house.