Financial topics

[aedens]

context: Both words for hardened are used here. The word for hardened in verse 34 is chabedh, which means hard in the sense of refusing to budge. In verse 35 the word for hard is chazaq, which stresses the strength, or firmness and arrogance,

Convictions against God as in any period of King, or any order we still consider valid. Job understood the meaning of who would come to redeem.

example: https://assets.answersingenesis.org/doc ... _Babel.pdf
http://history-world.org/akkadians.htm

warning: Atheists certainly do not, and cannot (consistent with their philosophy) condemn lying as an evil that is universally wrong.

They will be swept away as before, in confusion as it was, and will be told again.

Selah

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=2383166 --- The paper examines the techniques that foster information imbalances, such as media and propaganda, knowledge production, educational systems...

The Holy Qur’an teaches us that Iblis (Antichrist) is what he is because of – arrogance!

separate thread:
This is said of Christ in his human nature. He is "equal to the Father, as touching his Godhead; inferior to the Father, as touching his manhood." In his Divine nature he could receive nothing; in his human nature all "power was given unto him in heaven and earth" (Matthew 28:18). Till I make (ἕως α}ν θῷ) thine enemies thy footstool; ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου. This is the Septuagint reading. Many manuscripts here give ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου Τιλλ Ι πυτ τηινε ενεμιεσ υνδερνεατη τηψ φεετ. Some few have both ὑποπόδιον and ὑποκάτω. Vulgate, Donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum. The complete subjection of all adversaries is denoted (comp. 1 Corinthians 15:25-27; Hebrews 1:13); and they are subjected not merely for punishment and destruction, but, it may be, for salvation and glory. The relative particle "till" must not be pressed, as if Christ's session was to cease when his victory was completed. We have before had occasion to observe that the phrase, ἕως οῦ, or ἕως α}ν, asserts nothing of the future beyond the event specified. As St. Jerome says of such negative phrases, "Ita negant praeteritum ut non ponant futurum" (comp. Matthew 1:25; Matthew 5:26; Matthew 18:34). Of Christ's kingdom there is no end.

"If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son?"
No one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions. mt22:46

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/90 ... iew_page=1 no excuses or short cuts

Indicatively, selling 5% in a company valued at $2 trillion would mean a $100 billion liquidity check to the Saudi government, or enough to fund the country's reserve outflows for at least year, and perhaps as much as two - a period of time that would be sufficient to put virtually all marginal shale producers, as well as a Venezuela or two, out of business.

water wheat weather

2018

[aedens]

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated...
--------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
--------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
--------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
--------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
--------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
--------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

[Nathan G]

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated...

The fact that anyone has to look up those kind of statistics is really sad. Every dictatorship that ever was, as old as the tyrants of Greece, worked to disarm the populace to establish their control. And why does the American government suddenly bring it up now? Because the simple fact that we have reached the same stage as our predecessors. People who don't see that are either ignorant of human society or brainwashed by it.

[aedens]

http://sayed7asan.blogspot.in/2016/01/s ... s.html?m=1

Who won since violence is the vestage of incompetance. All those names you forwarded are dead.
As we could watch the phylogenetically slowed pagans wake up?

Adjectives are just messengers being shot. 1861 Internecine Slaughter, not a civil war.....

[John]

Just heard in on the BBC World News:

> "There are a lot of reasons to be optimistic. This is the
> strongest two-year period of job growth since the late 90s."

That was just before the Nasdaq crash of 2000. Never let it be said
that government politicians are capable of thought.

[aedens]

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated...

The fact that anyone has to look up those kind of statistics is really sad. Every dictatorship that ever was, as old as the tyrants of Greece, worked to disarm the populace to establish their control. And why does the American government suddenly bring it up now? Because the simple fact that we have reached the same stage as our predecessors. People who don't see that are either ignorant of human society or brainwashed by it.

https://s8int.com/phile/giants26.html we mentioned red tooth and claw for a reason

[gerald]

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated...

The fact that anyone has to look up those kind of statistics is really sad. Every dictatorship that ever was, as old as the tyrants of Greece, worked to disarm the populace to establish their control. And why does the American government suddenly bring it up now? Because the simple fact that we have reached the same stage as our predecessors. People who don't see that are either ignorant of human society or brainwashed by it.

https://s8int.com/phile/giants26.html we mentioned red tooth and claw for a reason

There are a lot of ooparts, but they are inconvenient to the party line so they are generally ignored. = big problem.

[aedens]

Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory.

The last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it’s a form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social Research.

Economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation.

Basis is simple. Taxpayers are idiots to support it.

Adjectives are just messengers being shot. 1861 Internecine Slaughter, not a civil war.....

"Hear, you people’’ (all of them, so the margin reads it), "all you that are now within hearing, and all others that hear it at second hand.’’ It is an unusual construction; but those words with which Micah begins his prophecy are the very same in the original with those wherewith Micaiah ended his, 1 Ki. 22:28 . The earth is called upon, with all that therein is, to hear what the prophet has to say: Hearken, O earth! The earth shall be made to shake under the stroke and weight of the judgments coming; sooner will the earth hear than this stupid senseless people; but God will be heard when he pleads. If the church, and those in it, will not hear, the earth, and those in it, shall, and shame them. God himself is appealed to, and his omniscience, power, and justice, are vouched in testimony against this people: "Let the Lord God be witness against you, a witness that you had fair warning given you, that your prophets did their duty faithfully as watchmen, but you would not take the warning.


A 20th-century conspiracy theory regards the Frankfurt School as the origin of a contemporary movement in the political left to destroy western culture, referred to as "Cultural Marxism" by theory proponents.[50][51] It advocates the idea that multiculturalism and political correctness are products of critical theory, which originated with the Frankfurt School. The theory is associated with American religious paleoconservatives such as William Lind, Pat Buchanan and Paul Weyrich, and has received support from the Free Congress Foundation.[52][53][54][55]

Although it became more widespread in the late 1990s and 2000s, the modern iteration of the theory originated within Michael Minnicino's 1992 essay "New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness'", published in Fidelio Magazine by the Schiller Institute.[56][57][58] The Schiller Institute, a branch of the LaRouche movement, further promoted the idea in 1994.[59] The Minnicino article charges that the Frankfurt School promoted Modernism in the arts as a form of Cultural pessimism, and played a role in shaping the 1960s counterculture.[56] In 1999 Lind led the creation of an hour-long program, Political Correctness: The Frankfurt School.[57] The documentary

"... spawned a number of condensed textual versions, which were reproduced on a number of radical right-wing sites. These in turn led to a welter of new videos now available on YouTube, which feature an odd cast of pseudo-experts regurgitating exactly the same line. The message is numbingly simplistic: all the ills of modern American culture, from feminism, affirmative action, sexual liberation and gay rights to the decay of traditional education and even environmentalism are ultimately attributable to the insidious influence of the members of the Institute for Social Research who came to America in the 1930's."[57]

Dr. Heidi Beirich likewise claims the concept is used to demonize various conservative "bêtes noires" including "feminists, homosexuals, secular humanists, multiculturalist, sex educators, environmentalist, immigrants, and black nationalists."[60]

According to Chip Berlet, who specializes in the study of extreme right-wing movements, the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory found fertile ground within the Tea Party movement of 2009, with contributions published in the American Thinker and WorldNetDaily highlighted by some Tea Party websites.[61][62]

More recently, the Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik included the term in his self-authored document "2083: A European Declaration of Independence", which along with the Free Congress Foundation's "Political Correctness: A Short History of an Ideology" was e-mailed to 1,003 addresses about 90 minutes before the 2011 bomb blast in Oslo for which Breivik was responsible.[63][64][65]

Philosopher and political science lecturer Jérôme Jamin has stated that "Next to the global dimension of the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, there is its innovative and original dimension, which lets its authors avoid racist discourses and pretend to be defenders of democracy".[52] Professor and Oxford Fellow Matthew Feldman has traced the terminology back to the pre-war German concept of Cultural Bolshevism locating it as part of the degeneration discourse that aided in Hitler's rise to power.[66] William S. Lind confirms this as his period of interest, claiming that "It [Cultural Marxism] is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I."[67]

^ Lind, William S. "What is Cultural Marxism?". Maryland Thursday Meeting. Retrieved 9 April 2015.
52.^ Jump up to: a b Jamin, Jérôme (2014). "Cultural Marxism and the Radical Right". In Shekhovtsov, A.; Jackson, P. The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate. The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan). pp. 84–103. doi:10.1057/9781137396211.0009. ISBN 978-1-137-39619-8. Retrieved 18 January 2015.
53.Jump up ^ Richardson, John E. "‘Cultural-Marxism’ and the British National Party: a transnational discourse". In Copsey, Nigel; Richardson, John E. Cultures of Post-War British Fascism.
54.Jump up ^ Wodak, ed. by Ruth; KhosraviNik, Majid; Mral, Brigitte (2012). Right wing populism in Europe : politics and discourse (1st. publ. 2013. ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 96,97. ISBN 978-1780932453. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
55.Jump up ^ Weyrich, Paul. "Letter to Conservatives by Paul M. Weyrich". Conservative Think Tank: "The National Center for Public Policy Research". Retrieved 30 November 2015.
56.^ Jump up to: a b "New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness'", Schiller Institute
57.^ Jump up to: a b c Jay, Martin (2010), "Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment: The Frankfurt School as Scapegoat of the Lunatic Fringe". Salmagundi (Fall 2010-Winter 2011, 168–169): 30–40.
58.Jump up ^ Jay (2010) notes that Daniel Estulin's book cites this essay and that the Free Congress Foundation's program was inspired by it.
59.Jump up ^ Michael Minnicino (1994), Freud and the Frankfurt School (Schiller Institute 1994), part of "Solving the Paradox of Current World History", a conference report published in Executive Intelligence Review
60.Jump up ^ Perry, Barbara (ed.); Beirich, Heidi (2009). Hate crimes [vol.5]. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers. p. 119. ISBN 0275995690. Retrieved 30 November 2015.
61.Jump up ^ Berlet, Chip (July 2012). "Collectivists, Communists, Labor Bosses, and Treason: The Tea Parties as Right-Wing Populist Counter-Subversion Panic". Critical Sociology 38 (4): 565–587. doi:10.1177/0896920511434750.
62.Jump up ^ Truman, David. "What is Cultural Marxism?". Australian Tea Party. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
63.Jump up ^ "'Breivik manifesto' details chilling attack preparation". BBC News. 24 July 2011. Retrieved 2 August 2015.
64.Jump up ^ Trilling, Daniel (18 April 2012). "Who are Breivik’s fellow travellers?". New Statesman. Retrieved 18 July 2015.
65.Jump up ^ Buruma, Ian. "Breivik's Call to Arms". Qantara. German Federal Agency for Civic Education & Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
66.Jump up ^ Matthew, Feldman; Griffin, Roger (editor) (2003). Fascism: Fascism and culture (1. publ. ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 343. ISBN 978-0415290180. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
67.Jump up ^ Lind, William S. "The Origins of Political Correctness". Accuracy in Academia. Accuracy in Academia/Daniel J. Flynn. Retrieved 8 November 2015.

[aedens]

http://www.endofinnocence.com/2010/06/o ... -guns.html

brain dead vote

[aedens]

Thomas Perez, US Secretary of Labor wrote:> "There are a lot of reasons to be optimistic. This is the
> strongest two-year period of job growth since the late 90s."

That was just before the Nasdaq crash of 2000. Never let it be said
that government politicians are capable of thought.

As also J conveys,

Elitism: Needless to say, so much free money and so much power creates a class of people who could not compete in a free-market, and yet, who feel entitled to … well … everything. They are much like trust fund babies, or like the boss’s son. In fact, their character is similar to that of the people they have trapped in government dependency.

Most elites think the rest of us are just sucking up their resources. We are useless eaters, and the earth would be a lot better off if there were far fewer of us. That’s called eugenics – much like what was proposed by Obama’s progressive science czar. It is no secret that Nazis were inspired by the eugenics of American progressives. It is thus almost as if the exponential growth in physical and mental maladies were part of some plan.

Therefore, elites plot to convince us that we need a global government to protect the earth – hence exaggerated global threats like anthropogenic global warming. Of course, they would control their new global government just as easily as they control the US government. Then there would be even less diversity of ideas in government which would be just about perfect for an established oligarchy.

Elites protect themselves by keeping us divided against each other, which is another reason for their programs such as affirmative action, welfare, title IX, sexual harassment, political correctness, and all other manifestations of identity politics. They use the same technique Machiavelli recommended to divide and conquer a people. They are not ideological. They will support any weak faction, but always through coercive means – in order to maximize division among the people.

Whichever party is in power, the federal debt rises, poverty increases, and regulation increases. Their regulations reduce competition and retard innovation. Fewer competitors and retarded innovation are solving problems slower than they occur; whereas, a freer market used to solve problems faster than they occurred.

Reduced competition and slower innovation is a good thing to those elites who want to maintain control over the people and continue milking them. I think that perhaps at one time, elites were more noble, but then they lost their way. They have been corrupted by … themselves.

And why does the American government suddenly bring it up now? Because they where told since they do not work for you now do they?
Thousands locally retarded from lead poisoning and thousands who will be sick from chemical chains ending in ene, which indeed kill.
Ask real person what is actually going on. Basis is simple. Taxpayers are idiots to support it.

If the church, and those in it, will not hear, the earth, and those in it, shall, and shame them. God himself is appealed to, and his omniscience, power, and justice, are vouched in testimony against this people: "Let the Lord God be witness against you, a witness that you had fair warning given you, that your prophets did their duty faithfully as watchmen, but you would not take the warning.