Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

spottybrowncow wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 11:27 am Anyone who really thinks that Trump would have been charged with these "crimes" if he were not the republican nominee is a very dim bulb, to say the least. "Not politically motivated," my big hairy ass.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1796527056404291679

guest wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 7:02 pm Who are you talking about? Trump didn't commit any crimes, and that will be established in time, but probably not until after he becomes president. Foolish evil people are gloating now, but their laughter will turn to wails before the fat lady sings.

I can't wait to see the next justice department prosecuting all these slimy slugs in state and federal government who have betrayed their public trust - THEY deserve hard time as a lesson to others who would sacrifice our constitutional republic to satisfy their own lust for power. Hopefully they will spend a lot of time in the DC jail, there will be a lot of room there after the J6 political prisoners are released.

Bob Butler wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 5:06 pm I did a quick search looking for the number of tax cases in New York and ended up in FindLaw. The primary chart had 11,784 entries. The first of many pages included everyone from Exxon Mobil Corporation to the Sisters of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Most were individuals. the first 20 entries were all from the dame day, May 16 2024, indicating again that the number of cases is a lot. It is as if the federal and state governments wanted money and chased anyone who didn't care to provide it...

The 'STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE" put out a guideline for the 'CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS OF TAX FRAUD CASES'. It looked far more financial than political to me.

https://www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/enforcement/ ... elines.pdf

I have heard it said that if you don't want to do the time, you shouldn't do the crime.

guest wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 7:02 pm Who are you talking about? Trump didn't commit any crimes, and that will be established in time, but probably not until after he becomes president. Foolish evil people are gloating now, but their laughter will turn to wails before the fat lady sings.

Bob Butler wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 11:21 pm

guest wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 7:02 pm Who are you talking about? Trump didn't commit any crimes, and that will be established in time, but probably not until after he becomes president. Foolish evil people are gloating now, but their laughter will turn to wails before the fat lady sings.

One of the things mentioned often in the MSM trial coverage was how a jury of everyday people picked by a fair process by both sides paid attention. They reached a solid conclusion with witnesses testimony confirmed by documents. I happen to agree with them, but have only highlights of the evidence picked up from TV summaries.

What do partisan assertions with no evidence count for? What evidence of Trump not committing any crimes should have been presented but weren't? Do you think you are better lawyers than Trump found? If you were presenting any evidence I could counter it, but you aren't. That speaks to the value of what you are claiming.

Guest wrote: Sat Jun 01, 2024 7:07 am

Bob Butler wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 11:21 pm

guest wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 7:02 pm Who are you talking about? Trump didn't commit any crimes, and that will be established in time, but probably not until after he becomes president. Foolish evil people are gloating now, but their laughter will turn to wails before the fat lady sings.

One of the things mentioned often in the MSM trial coverage was how a jury of everyday people picked by a fair process by both sides paid attention. They reached a solid conclusion with witnesses testimony confirmed by documents. I happen to agree with them, but have only highlights of the evidence picked up from TV summaries.

What do partisan assertions with no evidence count for? What evidence of Trump not committing any crimes should have been presented but weren't? Do you think you are better lawyers than Trump found? If you were presenting any evidence I could counter it, but you aren't. That speaks to the value of what you are claiming.

No defendent walk free ifrom a kangaroo court.

Bob Butler wrote: Sat Jun 01, 2024 7:32 am

Guest wrote: Sat Jun 01, 2024 7:07 am

Bob Butler wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 11:21 pm

One of the things mentioned often in the MSM trial coverage was how a jury of everyday people picked by a fair process by both sides paid attention. They reached a solid conclusion with witnesses testimony confirmed by documents. I happen to agree with them, but have only highlights of the evidence picked up from TV summaries.

What do partisan assertions with no evidence count for? What evidence of Trump not committing any crimes should have been presented but weren't? Do you think you are better lawyers than Trump found? If you were presenting any evidence I could counter it, but you aren't. That speaks to the value of what you are claiming.

No defendent walk free ifrom a kangaroo court.

But what evidence do you have this was a kangaroo court? You have a right to spout nonsense, but what have you got to be taken seriously?

This seems to be the modus operandi of the MAGA movement. You make many absurd claims that contradict serious investigations of the courts. Somehow, you think this justifies taking each other's claims seriously. I don't see it.