Generational Dynamics World View News

[Bob Butler]

Where do I begin?

Whites are on the brink of becoming a minority, if they are not one already (bi-racial/ white hispanics,etc.). Whites have already been demonized and locked out of colleges and jobs by racial quotas and political correctness.

Doctrines? You mean like teaching Critical Race Theory and the promotion homosexuality in public schools?

Undue influence on government? You mean like BLM?

Once upon a time police officers would murder blacks. The Black Lives Matter protests seemed to have slowed that down considerably. They worked. Sure, there were problems with rural racists and urban criminals, but there always are. If the government is committing murder is it not proper to try to change it?

Over the course of history, bringing in immigrants to perform cheap labor has been a US policy. This has gone from black slavery to Ellis Island to the current problems with the Mexico border. Thing is, if you continuously bring in minorities, will you retain your majority? If you live by immigration you have to deal with it. You cannot force your own prejudices and religious doctrines on those you bring in.

Immigration has made race a factor in American culture. Enslave blacks. Take native lands. Ban asian women from immigrating. Deny Irish jobs. Some of that we have gotten rid of. There are lots of echos of it remaining. How do you get rid of those echoes if you don’t teach about how they came to be? If the US has a drug problem and some South Americans help the US fight the drug cartels, do we not owe them a chance at asylum? If a group wants to form within a school population, are you prejudiced against them? If a group perceives of itself falsely as privileged, how do you get them to share the privilege?

The truth should be taught. Those with unusual sexual preferences should be allowed to gather together even if the preferences are not actively encouraged. Special privileges should be ended.

[Guest]

For the record: Immigration at any noticeable level into a developed economy (any Western economy) is never a benefit of any kind.

Immigration always detracts from real wealth creation; It crowds out indigenous family formation, weakens social trust and bonds, lowers national competence and can only ever be sustained by public debt. Most importantly, the social costs are borne by those least able to bear them.

Unless immigrants are arriving in a country with untapped and exploitable natural resources and most of all, space to expand into, any economic benefits such as they are will only ever accrue to the immigrant. Britain does not have any appreciable measure of these attributes that would require immigration in order to exploit them. As one economist pointed out to me “We don’t have untapped resources and you simply cannot run an advanced economy on drug dealing, vape shops and pimping out underage white girls”.

Mass immigration is by any measure straight forward wealth extraction by the immigrant.

[Guest]

Priorities: While Germans are dying from knife attacks, the German government has other priorities. 5 days after Mannheim stabbing attack on a Geeman politician, 70 flats were raided to take action against ‘hate postings’ --people demanding immigration restrictions and deportation of foreign criminals.

Only severe repression will prevent deportation and remigration.

[ZW G]

White pills keep coming. Germany on the road to re-awakening

JUST IN - Right-wing AfD becomes the second strongest party in Germany, outperforming all three members of the ruling left-green-liberal coalition in the EU elections.

[Bob Butler]

For the record: Immigration at any noticeable level into a developed economy (any Western economy) is never a benefit of any kind.

Immigration always detracts from real wealth creation; It crowds out indigenous family formation, weakens social trust and bonds, lowers national competence and can only ever be sustained by public debt. Most importantly, the social costs are borne by those least able to bear them.

What you say there may be relatively true of modern immigration, but you may want to rethink the word ’never’. In North America of the colonial through Gilded Age period, the area developed significantly economically. Then again, that emigration was motivated by a desire for economic expansion. I have a distinct feeling that much modern motivation is that if a colonial or subjugated people helped a country exploit a foreign land there is owed a chance if it all goes south to for the people to immigrate to the mother country. For example, if a South American helped fight a drug cartels, he might have cause to expect asylum. That motivation is not economic expansion, and the result isn’t either.

I also get a racist overtone in many of your observations. A people is judged as having all the vices of the worst criminals among them. As an engineer, I encountered a few well educated and technically competent asian immigrants. Painting all immigrants with ugly stereotypes seems undeserving and tempts the disregarding of all you say as hateful prejudice. Still, there is some truth to it.

I am also anticipating global warming immigration. Those living in coastlands becoming submerged might wish to move to areas like northern Siberia and Canada which have been too cold in the past for significant development. The reason why a country decides to allow immigration would matter, though global warming immigration is to date hypothetical.

[Guest]

I wonder how many of the immigrants will stick around the US, UK, etc. after the financial system crashes and they aren’t being handed goodies any more? The future is in the East, not the West.

It will take decades for the West to rebuild its industrial base, and it will need leadership that it doesn’t have to even begin that process.

[El Cid M]

The future is in the East, not the West.

True, however, what kind of future would a CCP dominated East be like? North Korea comes to mind.

[Bob Butler]

The future is in the East, not the West.

True, however, what kind of future would a CCP dominated East be like? North Korea comes to mind.

China is heading towards collapse. They put too much energy into building cities, houses and water projects. Some sort of vast change is likely. For that reason it is not certain that future China will be like the recent past, that the CCP or even China will dominate.

[Guest]

The future is in the East, not the West.

True, however, what kind of future would a CCP dominated East be like? North Korea comes to mind.

China is heading towards collapse. They put too much energy into building cities, houses and water projects. Some sort of vast change is likely. For that reason it is not certain that future China will be like the recent past, that the CCP or even China will dominate.

Wishful thinking.

[FullMoon]

I wonder how many of the immigrants will stick around the US, UK, etc. after the financial system crashes and they aren’t being handed goodies any more? The future is in the East, not the West.

It will take decades for the West to rebuild its industrial base, and it will need leadership that it doesn’t have to even begin that process.

The rebuild is in process. But degradation is well documented in the Dark Age Hovel. Without a benevolent hegemon, the East looks more bleak than we can imagine. They're entire modern model is too dependent on globalism. Which is going away and the biggest to fall is trying to drag everyone down into the hell of their own making. If Covid was a preview, the main show should be a radiating brilliance. Mushrooms grow without the need for much sunlight and feed on decay.