It was said…
Donald Trump implicitly ran a campaign which appealed to the disgruntled white working class voter. Ergo, there is a distinct element of ethnic nationalism to him and his policies, reminiscent of the fascist politics witnessed in Germany & Italy during the 1930s. Trump appointing a senior figure of the alt-right has confirmed these suspicions. What I will agree with, however, is that the center-left (or more accurately, their neoliberal lobbyists) have erred, and erred greatly. Under neoliberalism's "guidance", the Democratic Party first of all promoted the falsehood that rich whites don't exploit poor whites, and it aggressively pushed forward identity politics as a substitute for economic Leftism. Both strategies appear to have served a singular purpose: to divert the attention of the electorate away from the class struggle.
http://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/news/jimcro ... teracy.pdf
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-0 ... iterranean
It was said, Politicians will quickly overcome morality and moralism when they see it isn't winning them the votes. The Dems refuse to do this. The demand the alienation and subjugation of the majority. As thus, they will lose, now and forever. Even the Soviets weren't this retarded.
http://ponerology.com/ Even average people read into the narrative the left and the right are bat shit crazy.
Well, the warning and fact was observed later that eighty percent above the pretend to pay us we pretend to work are working in the current administrative function after Yeltsin was soundly reproved we found. Mr. Gorbachev told Soviet journalists then that ''even the most extreme viewpoint contains something valuable and rational, since a person who defends it honestly shows concern for the common good.
But according to the second theory, Mr. Gorbachev, who is regarded as a realist and an acute politician, recognized that a defense of Mr. Yeltsin would be too costly and might jeopardize his domestic programs, and decided that a restoration of order and consensus outweighed the loss of an ally.
A third theory, popular among those who doubt Mr. Gorbachev's political strength, suggests that he had no choice, that conservative forces in the leadership demanded that Mr. Yeltsin be removed.
No my views but those that had wings.
Change a few names and dates and nothing will change other than the famine of the word.
Today we note,
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/03/world ... jsonp&_r=0
The point is we would not piss on the NYT if it was on fire and we have to be independent to survive all the coastal salt water voodoo economics also. The Democrats under the banner of Marxist soup will soon understand some old lessons in a typical day later than sooner it appears. At least the Chinese look forward and conveyed a win win rhetoric of facts they proffer.
http://www.mohicanpress.com/mo08016.html
I still consider the fact we have not seen a factual democrat since Madison wrote of "total separation of the church from the state. Strongly guarded as is the separation between Religion & Government in the Constitution of the United States," Madison wrote, and he declared, "practical distinction between Religion and Civil Government is essential to the purity of both, and as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States." In a letter to Edward Livingston Madison further expanded, "We are teaching the world the great truth that Government’s do better without Kings and Nobles than with them.
Steven Waldman notes that; The evangelicals provided the political muscle for the efforts of Madison and Jefferson, not merely because they wanted to block official churches but because they wanted to keep the spiritual and secular worlds apart. Religious freedom resulted from an alliance of unlikely partners," writes the historian Frank Lambert in his book The Founding Fathers and the Place of Religion in America. "New Light evangelicals such as Isaac Bachus and John Leland joined forces with Deists and skeptics such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson to fight for a complete separation of church and state."
Politics and Religion in the United States.
As we read they still do not get it.
http://theweek.com/articles/664828/hill ... ory-fault-
Thread: Robert N. Bellah has in his writings that although the separation of church and state is grounded firmly in the constitution of the United States, this does not mean that there is no religious dimension in the political society of the United States. He used the term "Civil Religion" to describe the specific relation between politics and religion in the United States. His 1967 article analyzes the inaugural speech of John F. Kennedy: Considering the separation of church and state, how is a president justified in using the word 'God' at all? The answer is that the separation of church and state has not denied the political realm a religious dimension.
The assertion as a contention that the taxpayer is deplorable was pointed upward we contend, not down as the irony is still the fact few will consider. It is like saying we regard Republicans are a public virtue. The current new office holder understands some markets are not coming back.
http://bbs.dailystormer.com/uploads/def ... d96cb9.jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour ... ug/1066480
Always show any other Indians you meet on the way a cheerful face and show that you readily accept the fatigues of the journey.
http://www.mohicanpress.com/mo08016.html
Seems to us fly overs, they coasters have learned little and respect even less.
As we respect even less and learned little is meant to be conveyed to the worthless bookends.
Emphasis as we are stuck in the middle as the memory's as autumn leaves fall off the trees.
As we warned when the child misbehaves, slap the grandmother. No party is exempt from that warning.
It took four hundred years for one group to decay to what was vomited out of the land
as another group four hundred years to learn a simple lesson in His time we also have been warned..
