Re: Financial topics
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:09 am
The dialectical sense is more general because it does not distinguish between essential and accidental inherence. But the grammatical sense is more precise (determinatior). Taken in the dialectical sense the correct rhetorical position antifa is dialectical since William (ca. 1070-1122) who taught at the cathedral school of Notre Dame in Paris and the monastery of St. Victor. His staunch defense of realism in logic and metaphysics earned him a reputation as a preeminent philosopher of the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries. These philosophical and theological commitments fueled the conflict with his most famous student, Peter Abelard, a conflict that was continued between Abelard and William's most famous protégé, Bernard of Clairvaux.
As we noted clearly the government of that nation allowed the people to talk about public affairs, but not to understand them.
Political Economy by J.C.L. Simonde de Sismondi (1815)
To the thinking today it was Sismondi's work that picked apart in the so called French Café intellectual's purview age as the alleged agent's of change soundly ignored in the States until 1963.
Dunoyer also incorporated Sismondi's theory into the Sayardian conception of political economy in which men have to adapt their behaviour to the nature of things, or suffer the consequences.
Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would "the rest of society" accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven's early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism – by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” rand
Avoiding ACA perception trip wires with the saboteurs in the US government from the previous Left-wing liberals that want collectivism... The entire narrative of the Left is designed to promote collectivism and induce regression through educational indoctrination and the media as Hillary Clinton famously remarked they need “an unaware compliant public.”
What these antifa village and useful idiots do not fathom the whole system they want is predicated on exploitation of class and slavery of dialectic intent as we abolished strife in the formative period of capital formation.
http://www.votescam.org/votescam
https://www.electiondefense.org/
https://web.archive.org/web/20071109173 ... index.html
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... s-sold.png
As we noted clearly the government of that nation allowed the people to talk about public affairs, but not to understand them.
Political Economy by J.C.L. Simonde de Sismondi (1815)
To the thinking today it was Sismondi's work that picked apart in the so called French Café intellectual's purview age as the alleged agent's of change soundly ignored in the States until 1963.
Dunoyer also incorporated Sismondi's theory into the Sayardian conception of political economy in which men have to adapt their behaviour to the nature of things, or suffer the consequences.
Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would "the rest of society" accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven's early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism – by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” rand
Avoiding ACA perception trip wires with the saboteurs in the US government from the previous Left-wing liberals that want collectivism... The entire narrative of the Left is designed to promote collectivism and induce regression through educational indoctrination and the media as Hillary Clinton famously remarked they need “an unaware compliant public.”
What these antifa village and useful idiots do not fathom the whole system they want is predicated on exploitation of class and slavery of dialectic intent as we abolished strife in the formative period of capital formation.
http://www.votescam.org/votescam
https://www.electiondefense.org/
https://web.archive.org/web/20071109173 ... index.html
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... s-sold.png