Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

It is hard for frackers, truck drivers, and other working people to take off from work and go to the polls. The election will be re-run in November. The GOP didn't raise much money for Saccone. The district boundaries will also be changing. There is a lot to the story, so I don't think Soros was involved here. It is high time for voting on non-work days. The free shit army can always go to the polls. They have time on their hands. There is no vote by mail or early voting in Pennsylvania.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Wells+Fargo%2 ... =hy&ia=web
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03- ... ement-unit

Wells Fargo is the poster child to why the taxpayer knows the R brand is also another disease.

As companies slashed production to clear excess stocks, output is now stabilising.
Just as intriguing, however, is chapter four of the OECD report, which deals with longer-term prospects. “A major uncertainty,” it says, “is the magnitude of any adverse effects the crisis may have on the level or growth rate of supply-side potential.” In other words, is this recession so severe that it will affect the rate of growth of the advanced economies not only in the short term, but also in the medium or long term? When severe, the OECD says, crises can permanently lower potential output by up to 4%.

For the eurozone itself, the medium-term outlook is, to be kind, challenging. The slump is now increasing longstanding intra-eurozone economic divergences. In addition, eastern neighbours, including Russia, are financially and economically troubled. The well-advertised difficulties in restructuring to cope with the competitive threats from China, India and Brazil have mushroomed.
https://www.politico.eu/article/after-t ... ean-years/

Ai responded, humans are smart and programmable.

Yes, we seen that effect coming puter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beQMcLbIeWY

Posted January 12 and February 19:

Higgenbotham wrote:

John wrote:

Higgenbotham wrote:

So I guess the next stop must be 3500.

As one who is bearish, I don't want to forget the above chart and the importance of 2800 which I stressed in the days leading up to the most recent high. Do I know where the market is going? No, I don't. But as of now I can see a possible path back to 2800. Would I short again there? Maybe.

Posted March 12:

Higgenbotham wrote:Futures are up tonight and I'm short from close to 2800. We'll see how it goes, I guess. We've got a busted parabolic move and bears didn't think it would get this high and bulls are looking for a new all time high (of course).

Current position of market:

03/24/2000 to 10/11/2007 = 2757 days
10/11/2007 to 03/17/2018 = 3810 days
2757 x 1.382 = 3810

New Moon
March 17
8:11 am

Downward acceleration may start after this phase.

Do I know that it will? No, I don't. No man knows what the market will do.

agree …Inflation analysis cannot be limited to the volume of wages and salaries spent. To do so is to overlook the principal "engine" of inflation - which is of course, the volume of credit (new money), created by the Reserve & the commercial banks.

https://thetruthaboutbusiness.blogspot. ... d-its.html

DIDMCA 1980 significantly raised the P/Es of large banks, caused them to fluctuate more, and fundamentally changed the way in which they are determined. With P/Es raising investors are left paying more for each unit of stock.


Cost push since we seen with money leaving the mortgage lending institutions, the housing markets were being squeezed. This squeeze on banks, felt in some states, caused banks to cut off credit to households, farmers, and small businesses. Also, during this time only depository institutions were required to maintain non-interest bearing reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank (Allen & Wilhelm, 1988). This caused a record number of banks giving notice of leaving the Federal Reserve in order to be more competitive in the markets.

3.1% three-month annualized rate in February was the highest it's been since before the Lehman induced melt-down in September 2008.

As noted Thu Mar 15, 2018 4:47 pm A significant trade war started by this administration. Wrong answer.

Starting from the beginning of the 1980’s, deregulation and moral hazard lead to S&L crisis. As congress fights on to create a new set of financial reform, I hope they have all learned that deregulation is not reform.

I've said many things about the fundamental unsustainability of the bubble that proved to be incorrect (mostly circa 2012-2014). In late 2014, I realized I didn't know what I was talking about and dialed it back. Therefore, I will not try to pose as an expert regarding why, from a fundamental standpoint, this bubble may not be sustainable. It's pretty clear, though, that from the standpoint of time, price, and sentiment the bubble appears to be hitting a wall.

agree H

They will figure out later than sooner the researchers couldn’t design an experiment, and instead just began taking data.

nafta was the mortar rounds hitting the new shores as lighter fluid of the markets girls that locally where used and simply ignited.

The remaining paperclip industries where coveted, and now being dispersed as import tariff "ideologues" are the currency wars.

Some will understand off ramps so production can survive regimes.

The hand wringers in the "movement" went hard Left in the first two years of Barack Obama’s presidency, and never recovered.

"populated by newcomers to the process who demand ideological purity"

Just sign this witness cooperation agreement Andrew? Yes Jeff. <--- Jeff kinda fucked up not stressing the point you fucked up badly Son and Andrew is way past fucked up as we seen today. Thu Mar 15, 2018 3:26 pm

“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism – by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” rand

https://www.pbs.org/johngardner/chapters/5b.html

adjective rent or split apart.

Intercity jobs went to the suburbs
Suburbia jobs went to Nafta
The cratering effect we noted did two things as the organizers of both
ideological fronts cannot fathom the hard edges of both are not wanted
since taxpayers understand we where screwed by both.

https://truepundit.com/boiling-point-de ... e=engageim

If more former FBI agents spoke candidly, as Gritz has made a practice of doing, the FBI mess could be mopped up much faster. Instead, many agents — current and retired — continue to cower, afraid they might lose a pay check and a career in the corrupted law enforcement agency.

But not Gritz.

#ReinstateRobynGritz He took my job from me and should be fired. Corrupt and vicious. https://t.co/xpdN1nsMyf

— Valiant_defender (@vabelle2010) March 15, 2018

As reported in March 2017 by True Pundit, McCabe openly threatened President Trump and then-National Security Adviser Gen. Mike Flynn, saying first we “Fuck Flynn and then we Fuck Trump” to several high-ranking FBI bosses who cheered his comment.

The work has just begun for the Office.

https://www.mediaite.com/online/ex-cia- ... -over-you/

ftathtriw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=db6H2BMwPqg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ORCvypfhXA

Peter Eliades (Stockmarket Cycles) interviews with Neil Cavuto