
I will resume watching the market tomorrow at the cash open. I'm getting ready to buckle in for a potential crash and may not trade at all after tonight. We'll see how it looks in the morning.
In human form, pre-Resurection, your comment about the Son is correct. But time is part of God's creation and God lives outside of time, and is not constrained by time. God's sees from the beginning to the end of time. So Go d knows exactly what will happen in the future in every detail. With this updated theological information, and your ability to read the signs of the times, you could apply to be a prophet!John wrote: Tue May 05, 2020 3:04 pm No one knows the day or hour. The angels in heaven don't know, and the
Son himself doesn't know.
I did very little today except watch the market go down. It looks like the market could be passing through a sideways phase and getting ready to go into a down phase.Higgenbotham wrote: Wed May 06, 2020 5:00 am Tonight was one of my more difficult nights of trading. I traded through the Asia and Europe opens, smashing the bots for $1,100 as shown below. I could have easily lost money trading tonight, as there was no consistency in the market. However, it was my guess that the market would try to test 2880 at least one more time.
I will resume watching the market tomorrow at the cash open. I'm getting ready to buckle in for a potential crash and may not trade at all after tonight. We'll see how it looks in the morning.
Solvency is the aspect everyone seems to have forgotten about, or never learned.vincecate wrote: Wed May 06, 2020 8:39 am Many small businesses have had their business model destroyed. They can no longer make a profit. Having the Fed buy junk bonds mean they will sell junk bonds. Once they have the cash their best move after getting the money from the Fed (whichever program they used) is to pay themselves a big salary or bonus and then declare bankruptcy. After many people will be surprised that giving money did not keep the businesses open. The Fed is thinking like 2008 where cash/liquidity could get banks past their problem but today these businesses have a solvency problem and giving them cash does not fix that. For a large company like Boeing when they sell $27 billion in bonds it might fix it, but for a little restaurant their best move will be to take the cash and close up.
More applicable now than the day it was written, in my opinion.mannfm11 wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:00 am I'm not going to read much of this because there is a lot of chasing rabbits down holes. The Fed reports the monetary base because that is the amount of liability the Fed has to the system. The mess is the fact that private credit can't expand any more on a normal basis and it has little or nothing to do with PE's and other crap that is being talked here. The governments really can't sustain anything and Bernanke wasn't born smarter than 99.9% of all people, maybe not over 50%. People are in positions like this for reasons other than brains. In any case, his philosophy is that if something is bankrupt, you might as well see how bankrupt you can get it before it collapses. Irving Fisher was wrong about the economy when the depression started and he was wrong about what caused the depression. The only way they are going to stop a deflationary depression is to create a Weimar Republic in the US. There are more noses cut off in the ditches of leadership around the world than can be counted. We have global warming supposedly, which is probably another attempt of governments to gain control of and brand their people like they are cattle and they are going to do something about it, but in the meantime they are going to put out stimulus packages that make certain that as much in the way of pollution and destruction of natural resources as possible goes on. We are going to solve an insolvency problem with an even greater insolvency. We are going to take 3% dividends on stocks while the corporate bonds of most stocks are paying 10% to 15%? Some group of academic idiots seems to believe that you are supposed to compare stocks to treasuries. I am glad they don't raise livestock because they would put female pigs in with bulls and cows in with boars. There are 900 million miles between what is represented by a risk free asset as treasuries are and entities whose bonds are trading as bottom of the swamp junk.
90% of the time in history, stocks have been cheaper than they are now, but you would think a bonanza was to be had for those that would pile in while those that stayed out would be left crying. 20 years from now we are still going to be trying to get out of this trading range, which is being pushed as a bargain price. In the meantime, those that get in are going to lose everything they have. As John likes to repeat, we are at a stage that the world changes in ways that few are going to be able to follow. A collapse in demand for goods and credit is just part of the equation. I would venture that 50% of the Nasdaq and SPX would be in bankruptcy right now if not for government bailouts and ignored accounting fraud. I read today that the government is threatening a Texas financial firm while turning a blind eye to the NY firms that are in much worse financial shape. The morals of the country have gone to hell to the point that the entire country is nothing but a bunch of blind gamblers who know nothing about value. The owner of the Texas Rangers and Dallas Stars is out of credit, not that he ever put a dime up to buy anything. His bankers will be nicer to him than they will be to you and I, you can bet.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests