Page 2124 of 2983
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 11:50 am
by Higgenbotham
aeden wrote: Wed Jul 22, 2020 9:53 am
“The market is looking at a billion of things that we only know a very small amount of,” Shen said in a telephone interview from San Francisco. “While the philosophical conversation is right in the sense that there should be some fundamentals
relative to the price, how the market prices different fundamentals, different sentiment, different flows is pretty much a mystery to any one of us.”
"how the market prices different fundamentals"
"how the market prices...different sentiment"
"how the market prices...different flows"
The market doesn't have a way to price sentiment or flows like it does fundamentals. He seems to be saying that when fundamentals don't make sense it's because the market is not pricing just fundamentals, it's pricing sentiment and flows. It may be priced more or less based on sentiment and flows versus fundamentals at any given time, but it's not like the market looks at sentiment and flow information in the same way it looks at fundamentals.
This sounds like a typical San Franciscan trying to sound learned and authoritative, but I think he fails.
John wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2020 4:17 pm
** 18-Jun-2020 World View: P/E ratio
Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:09 pm
> If you asked him about mean reversion, he would probably say
> adjust the mean PE up to 22 and carry on. Also, not to worry, LEI
> will mean revert next month, following the stock market.
You're absolutely right. These analysts on CNBC and FBN and elsewhere
on tv are complete airheads. I just heard Mike Santoli on CNBC react
to a statement by Jeremy Grantham that we're currently in a "Real
McCoy bubble" by saying some nonsense like most investors are being
very careful about what stocks they buy, so the current atmosphere has
absolutely no resemblance to a bubble.
As you point out, nobody every asks about the ACTUAL VALUE of a stock.
I like to give the example of buying an apartment building. You
estimate the rents and expenses for the next 30 years, do a present
value computation, and that is the ACTUAL VALUE of the apartment
building from an investor point of view.
The only thing comparable in the world of stocks is the P/E ratio,
which historically is 14. So the fair value of a stock is 14 times
reported earnings, but as you say, that's ignored. If the P/E ratio
today is 22, then the fair value of the stock is 22 times earnings.
I wish I were joking, but I'm not. These people are airheads.
Well, I shouldn't talk. I compare these people to myself. I'm a
pariah who tells what's actually going on, and so I'm hated and
shunned. Santoli is an airhead, but he tells everyone what they want
to hear. So Santoli is loved by everyone.
Gee, I wonder what it would be like to be loved by everyone? Is it
too late to predict that the Dow will go up to 100,000?
It's another version of "Don't tell me the above is true because we need to make some money right now."
He might be long Tesla (after all, somebody is) and trying to justify why that is working.
I would look at this type of "explaining price" as typical of the kind of attempt to justify price that is seen around the end of a bubble.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:28 pm
by Higgenbotham
Enter Jeff Shen at BlackRock. According to a recent Bloomberg News article, Shen is leading a quant strategy to push the boundaries of returns as “value” stagnates and “growth” stocks explode higher.
Here’s a portion of the ideology that the strategy believes in, as per Shen:
The market is looking at a billion of things that we only know a very small amount of. While the philosophical conversation is right in the sense that there should be some fundamentals relative to the price, how the market prices different fundamentals, different sentiment, different flows is pretty much a mystery to any one of us.
For those who don’t speak Wall Street sales, allow me to translate: he doesn’t have a clue what’s happening.
Shen’s strategy is boldly seeking the riskiest stocks because they offer the most significant upside. (It’s a lot easier to be bold when you’re not gambling your life savings.)
If that doesn’t scream dot-com bubble, I don’t know what does.
https://www.ccn.com/even-blackrock-hasn ... th-stocks/
Correct, he has no clue.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:47 pm
by aeden
https://capitalresearch.org/article/act ... y-machine/ protester supply chain for blm employees
The Left’s most consistent principle seems to be hypocrisy.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:54 pm
by aeden
Your correct H and utilized option 4 today
as no move was the best
cash is more important
soon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IThBNPHWeQ
The dog barks, the caravan goes
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:07 pm
by Higgenbotham
aeden wrote: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:54 pm
Your correct H and utilized option 4 today
Another case of
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
― Upton Sinclair
It's a bubble.
And he's got $100 billion he doesn't know what to do with.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:23 pm
by aeden
True
I think the passive has a better grip than we can conclude in my simple view only.
Just dust from the caravan.
Opened a position on premium discount and one year numbers on NAV for book 1
Modest but still > 40% cash
Forrest picks up the feather and puts it in the book.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:01 pm
by Higgenbotham
My simple view for today.
Tech down, small caps down, transports down, utilities up strongly.
S&P is up so let's look at the breakdown. 7 of the 8 largest components are down. Looking through the top 50 stocks, generally it is the defensives carrying the index, consistent with strong utilities.
So my conclusion would be the market is due for a drop. Though I'm not backing that short term opinion with real money or real trades. I've done nothing for 2 days. Still holding 6 lots short.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:14 pm
by aeden
agree
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Kelly_Thomas
(1 + i) = (1 + r) (1 + π) fisher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsMUxdZGgWI
http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 0XX#p53078 pace is ticking up -
no need to confirm locally
we already know
brits want to replace the USA with China as their new Jr. partner
noted was 300 million not sleeping on dirt floors since college
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:04 pm
by aeden
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Larry+Krasner ... ave&ia=web
https://realisticobserver.blogspot.com/ ... ed-by.html
They don't want federal to enforce the laws. They want federal cash to further their corruption only.
Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood,
let alone believed, by the masses. --Plato
http://www.nancyisenberg.com/white-trash <--------------- panama and paradise papers control systems
and to bad blm is so brain dead to never understand duality.
1584 it started in north america and still they cannot understand it.
Re: Financial topics
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:23 pm
by ihatecnbc2000
Some strong memories I have of the end of the dotcom bubble was how the relationship between the Dow/S&P versus NASDAQ went kind of schizo, with various days having one up big with the other down and vice versa. Then you had blowout seemingly good news earnings (beating "whisper numbers") that resulted in those stocks getting sold hard. We've definitely had the schizo indices, lets see if the big tech "beats" in earnings get sold into.